The Effect of Mobile Social Networking as a Supplementary Strategy on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability

Sedigheh Talakoub


The popularity of mobile learning and social networking sites has encouraged second language instructors to integrate these technologies into learners’ curriculum. In this study, the learners were supposed to practice in an online jigsaw writing as an extra-curricular activity. They used their imagination and creativity to depict their thoughts using their previous knowledge. The current research had both a qualitative and quantitative phases. From the quantitative perspective, the effectiveness of mobile social networking on EFL learners’ writing ability was examined statistically. In doing so, 60 EFL learners were divided into the experimental and control groups. The learners of the experimental group were also assigned into three virtual groups in which they could help each other to write a piece of writing on pre-determined topics during twelve sessions. Running the t-test indicated that the students in the experimental group could significantly outperform their counterparts in the post-test. Therefore, it could be claimed that mobile social networking as a supplementary strategy had positive effects on EFL learners’ writing ability. In the qualitative phase of the study, a semi-structured interview was conducted in order to explore learners’ attitudes and beliefs about the experiment they had. The responses to the semi-structured interview also revealed that the learners had positive attitudes towards this online supplementary technology-supported writing. The pedagogical implications of the study were discussed and further suggestions were put forward. 



social networking, mobile social networking, collaborative writing

Full Text:



Aarts, B., & McMahon, A. (Eds.). (2008). The Handbook of English linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.

Alexander M. (2008), Good writing leads to good testing. good-testing

Beck, E. (1993). A survey of experiences of collaborative writing. In Computer supported collaborative writing, ed. M. Sharples, 9–28. London: Springer-Verlag.

Bogardus, E. S. (1931). Fundamentals of Social Psychology. New York: Century.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Byrne, D. (1979). Teaching writing skills. London: Longman House.

Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition (Vol. 25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Colomb, G.G., & Simutis, J.A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 203–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Connor, U. & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 257-276.

Curcher. M. (2009). A Case Study Examining the Implementation of Social Networking Technologies to Enhance Student Learning for Students Learning in a Second Language. brown.pdf (Accessed 25 November 2012).

Dale, H. (1997). Co-authoring in the classroom: Creating an environment for effective collaboration. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.

Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning, (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. London: Longman.

Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/ plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71.

Ezza, S., & Bakry, S. A. (2014). Technology-Enhanced Instruction in a Saudi EFL Classroom. Arab World English Journal. 8(12), 55-66.

Faghih, E., & Rahimpour, S. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts: Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 92-107.

Fahim, M., Miri, M., & Najafi, Y. (2014). Contributory role of collaborative assessment in improving critical thinking and writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(1), 1-11.

Gere, A.R., & Stevens, R.S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 85-105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.

Hatch, E. & Farhady, H. (1982) Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics, Newbury House.

Hatch, E. M. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Johanssen. (2nd ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 785-811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington, D. C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.. A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15-29.

Kadirire, J. (2009). Mobile Learning DeMystified. In R. Guy (Ed.), The Evolution of Mobile Teaching and Learning (pp. 15-56). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.

Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quality and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.

Kessler, G. (2009). Student initiated attention to form in autonomous wiki based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95.

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91-109.

Khabiri , M., & Tonekaboni, F. (2009). How to Boost Academic Essay Writing: A Choice between Process and Product Writing. Journal of Teaching.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.

Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: Sage Publication.

Lee, H. (2010). Smart phone based Chinese education application project and production experiment. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ewha Woman’s University, Seoul.

Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 35(1), 16–24.

Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case-study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260–276.

LeFevre, K. B. (1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

Louth, R., McAllister, C., & McAllister, H. A. (1993). The effects of collaborative writing techniques on freshman writing and attitudes. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(3), 215-224.

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

Masoodian, M., & Luz, S. (2001). COMAP: A content mapper for audio-mediated collaborative writing. Usability Evaluation and Interface Design, 1, 208-212.

Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2014). Peer evaluation in CMC learning environment and writing skill. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 3(5), 220-228.

Mendonça, C. & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.

Nguyen, L. V. (2008). Computer mediated communication and foreign language education: Pedagogical features. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(12), 23-44. Retrieved from

Nystrand, M., & Brandt, D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp.209-230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

O’Sullivan, D., Mulligan, D., & Dooley. L. (2007). Collaborative information system for university-based research institutes. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 4(3), 308–322.

Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London, UK: Hodder Education.

Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Collaborating for collaborative learning of text comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

Palmer, D. J., & Goetz, E. T. (1988). Selection and use of study strategies: The Role of the studier’s beliefs about self and strategies. In C. E. Weinstein et al. (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 77-100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

Parker, S. (1993). The Craft of Writing. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.

Pellettieri, J. (1999). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In. M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pennington, M. C. (1991). Positive and negative potentials of word processing for ESL writers. System, 19(3), 267–275.

Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2010). Computer anxiety and ICT integration in English classes among Iranian EFL teachers. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 203-209 Retreieved from

Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rice, R. P., & Huguley, J. T. J. R. (1994). Describing collaborative forms: A profile of the team writing process. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37(3), 163-170.

Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (eds.). (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching; AN Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59 (1), 23-30. Retrieved from

Rushatz, T. A. (1992). Cooperative learning: An examination of attitudes toward cooperative learning and its effectiveness. B.S. Thesis. State College, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.

Santangelo, T. & Olinghouse, N. G. (2009). Effective writing instruction for students who have writing difficulties. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(4), 1-20.

Saunders, W. M. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 101-112.

Speck, B. W., Johnson, T. R., Dice, C. P., & Heaton, L. B. (1999). Collaborative Writing: An Annotated Bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Spigelman, C. (2000). Across property lines: Textual ownership in writing groups. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.

Trimbur, J. (1985). Collaborative learning and teaching writing. In B. W. McClelland & T. R. Donovan (Eds.), Perspectives on research and scholarship in composition (pp. 87-109). New York: Modern Language Association.

Uysal, H. H. (2010). A critical review of the IELTS writing test. ELT Journal, 64(3), 314-320.

Vasu, K., Ling, C. H., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). Malaysian tertiary level ESL students’ perceptions toward teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-assessment in their writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(5), 158-170.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481.

Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Warschauer, M. ( 2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (3), 453- 475.

Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24(1), 1-14.

Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.

Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knoruledge togethpr. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100.

Zhang, S. (1985). The differential effects of sources of corrective feedback on ESL writing proficiency. University of Hawaii at Manoa: Department of English as a second language.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.