Investigating ESP Instructors’ Beliefs and Attitudes and Their Classroom Practices

Yousef Rajabi


This study was an attempt to examine Iranian ESP teachers’ beliefs and their ties with classroom practices. To do so through convenient sampling, twenty five ESP teachers teaching English for specific purposes in different disciplines such as Chemistry, Accounting, Mathematics, and Law at Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah branch, in Kermanshah city, Kermanshah, Iran participated in this study. Since the participants' gender was not among the aims of this study, its probable effects were controlled. In order for the data to be as reliable and valid as possible, the participants were interviewed and asked to fill in the questionnaire at times when they had free time.  The researcher had the teachers fill in the questionnaire. Then, they were interviewed in their free times most often outside the university. The findings of the study revealed that there was no relationship between ESP teachers’ beliefs on their teaching practices in the classroom.


English for specific purposes, teachers' beliefs, Classroom practices

Full Text:



Adelson, B. (1981). Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages. Memory & Cognition, 9, 422-433.

Atai, M. R. (2002a). Iranian EAP programs in practice: A study of key methodological aspects. Sheikhbahaee ELT Journal, 1(2), 1-15.

Atai, M.R. (2002b). ESP methodology revisited: A genre-based reading comprehension course for the students of dentistry. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 77-90.

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berliner, D. C. (1986).In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5-13.

Borg, M. (2001).Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186-188.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.

Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: a qualitative study of teachers’ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95-126.

Brindley, G. (2004).Needs analysis. In M. Byram (Ed.),Routledge Encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp.438-441).New York: Taylor and Francis.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge UP.

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986).Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary

approach. Cambridge University Press.

Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. J. (1998).Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fakharzadeh, M. (2000). Analyzing discoursal and formal needs of students of Psychology and sociology. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Farhady, H. (2006). Reflections on and directions for ESP materials development in SAMT.In Kiani&Khayamdar (Eds.), Proceedings of the First National ESP/EAP Conference, Volume 3. Tehran: SAMT Publication.

Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., &Tiniti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second language writing, 6,155-182.

Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.

Grossman, P. L. (1995). A psychological view of teachers: Teachers' knowledge. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nded.). Oxford: Pergamon.

Howatt, A. P. R. (2004). A History of English Language Teaching. (2nded.). Oxford: OUP.

Hutchinson, T. (1988). Making materials work in the ESP classroom. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation. ELT Documents 128 (pp. 71-75).

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purpose: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, K. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of pre-service English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.

Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon.

Mazdayasna, G. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs for the students of medical and midwifery in Iran. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research. 62, 307-332.

Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177-195.

Prodromou, L. 2002. From Mother Tongue to Other Tongue. Retrieved 22 October 2012 from: http: //

Rajabi, P., Kiani, G., & Maftoon, P. (2012). ESP in-service teacher training programs: Do they change Iranian teachers’ beliefs, classroom practices and students’ achievements? Ibérica, 24, 261-282.

Renzaglia, A., Hutchins, M., & Lee, S. (1997). The impact of teacher education on the beliefs, attitudes, and dispositions of pre-service special educators. Teacher Education and Special Educations, 4, 360-377.

Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and

applied linguistics (2ed edition). UK: Richard Clay plc, Bungay.

Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2002).Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rded.). London: Longman.

Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ryan, P. 2004. Teacher thinking. In M. Byram (Ed), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 610-616). New York: Taylor and Francis.

Strevens, P. (1992). English as an international language: Directions in the 1990s. In B. B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 27-47). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Strevens, P. (1988). The learner and teacher of ESP. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner, (Eds.), ESP in the classroom, practice and evaluation. ELT Documents, 128 (pp. 39-44).

Strevens, P. (1980). Teaching English as an International Language: Practice to Principle. Pergamon Press.

Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000).Making it their own: Pre-service teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practices, Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 112-121.

Swales, J. (2000).Languages for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 59–76.

Swales, J. (1988). Episodes in ESP. Prentice Hall.

Varnosfadrani, W. & Dabaghi, A. (2009). Teaching English for specific purposes. In: Reinelt, R. (Ed.), Into the next decade with (2nd) FL teaching (pp.181-201). Rudolf Reinelt Research Laboratory EU Matsuyama, Japan.

Waters, A. (1988). ESP: Back to the future! Especialist, 9(1), 27-43.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making, and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yarmohammadi, L. (2005). ESP in Iran from language planning perspective. Proceedings of the First National ESP/ EAP Conference, Volume 2.Tehran: SAMT Publications.

Zacharias, N. T. (2003). ‘A survey of tertiary teachers’ beliefs about English language teaching in Indonesia with regard to the role of English as a global language’. Unpublished MA thesis. Assumption University of Thailand: Institute for English Language Education.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.