The Effect of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Training on Intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate

Maryam Farzam

Abstract


The present study aimed at exploring the effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy training on the WTC of Iranian EFL learners. The participants of the study included 90 Iranian EFL learners at the intermediate level of English language proficiency. They were divided into three groups based on their performance on a general proficiency test. One group received cognitive strategy instruction, another metacognitive strategy instruction and the last one served as the control group. The participants were also tested before and after the treatment in terms of WTC. The results of statistical analysis showed that both cognitive and metacognitive strategy training had a positive effect on the WTC of Iranian EFL learners. It was also revealed that metacognitive and cognitive strategy training had similar effects on the WTC of the participants. 


Keywords


strategy training, cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, willingness to communicate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbasian, G. (2015). The relationship between metacognitive strategy use, good language learners, and Iranian EFL learners’s willingness to communicate. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 4(1), 27-45.

Ahmadi, A., & Mahmoodi, S. (2012). Language learning strategy use and instruction for the Iranian junior high school EFL learners. RALS, 3 (2), 107-134.

Ahmed Mahdi, D. (2014). Willingness to Communicate in English: A Case Study of EFL Students at King Khalid University. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 17-25.

Alemi, M., Tajeddin, Z., & Mesbah, Z. (2013). Willingness to communicate in L2 English: impact of learner variables. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 42-61.

Alhaisoni, E. (2012). “Language learning strategy use of Saudi EFL student’s inan intensive English learning context”. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 115-127

Aliakbari, M., Kamangar, M., & Khany, R. (2016). Willingness to Communicate in English among Iranian EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 33-44.

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. ERIC Clearing house on Languages and Linguistics.

Bandarabbasi, R., & Karbalaei, A. (2013). The study of the relationship between multiple intelligences and learning strategies among Iranian EFL learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 143-149.

Bergil, A. S. (2016). The Influence of Willingness to Communicate on Overall Speaking Skills among EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(2), 177 – 187.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Cao, Y., & Philip, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(3), 480-493.

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 112-130.

Chang, S. M., & Cho, C. H. (2003). Demotivating factors in foreign language learning. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching. (pp. 257-264). Taipei: Crane Publishing.

Chen, H. I. (2015). Learner autonomy and the use of language learning strategies in a Taiwanese Junior high school. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(1), 52-64.

Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. (1996). Prediction of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans-speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii: Honolulu.

Fahim, A., & Dhamotharan, M. (2016). Willingness to Communicate in English among Trainee Teachers in a Malaysian Private University. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 105-112.

Falout, J., & Maruyama, M. (2004). A Comparative Study of Proficiency and Learner Demotivation. The Language Teacher, 28(8), 3-9.

Farooq, F. U. (2015). Creating a communicative language teaching environment for improving students’ communicative competence at EFL/EAP University Level. International Education Studies, 8(4), 179-191.

Ghavamnia, M., Kassaian, Z., & Dabaghi, A. (2011). The relationship between language learning strategies, language learning beliefs, motivation, and proficiency: A study of EFL learners in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1156-1161.

Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and Research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213.

Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(4), 367-383.

Gürsoy, E. (2010). Investigating language learning strategies of EFL children for the development of a taxonomy. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 164-175.

Khajavy, Gh. H., Ghonsooly, B., & Hosseini Fatemi, A. (2016). Willingness to Communicate in English: A Microsystem Model in the Iranian EFL Classroom Context. TESOL QUARTERLY, 50(1), 154-180.

Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first year students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(19), 1853 – 1858.

Kyungsim, H., & Leavell, A. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(4), 399–415.

MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 564-576.

MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369-388.

MacIntyre, P., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. (2002). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(6), 545-562.

Martínez, R. J. J. Pérez, V., Luisa, M., Navarrete, H., José; De la Blanca de la Paz, S. (2016). Language learning strategy use by Spanish EFL students: the effect of proficiency level, gender, and motivation. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(1), 133-149.

Mashhady, H., & Fallah, N. (2014). The relationship between language learning strategies, field of study, gender, and language proficiency. IJRELT, 2(2), 46-61.

Matsuoka, R., & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. Journal of Nurse Studies NCNJ, 4(1), 3-12.

Mulcahy, R., Marfo, K., Peat, D., & Andrews, J. (1987). Strategies program for effective learning and thinking: A teachers manual. Alberta. University of Alberta.

Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effect of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 176-192.

O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.

O'Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. (1995). Instructional implications of gender differences in second/foreign language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning 4, pp. 65-94.

Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Learning Styles & Strategies/Oxford, GALA. Retrieved from http://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf

Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359-386.

Oxford, R., & Scarcella, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: the individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37(3), 269–275.

Park, G. )1997(. Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency in Korean University Students. Foreign Language Annals 30(2), 211-21

Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rahbar, B., Suzani, M., & Sajadi, Z. (2016). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 10-17.

Rashtchi, M., Khani, P. (2010). Improving EFL learner’s oral proficiency through metacognitive strategy instruction. JELS, 1(4), 137-156.

Rasouli, M., Mollakhan, K., & Karbalaei, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(1), 115-128.

Sakai, H., & Kikuchi, k. (2009). An analysis of demotivates in the EFL classroom. System, 37(1), 57–69.

Schroeder, R. (2016). The Development and Validation of the Academic Spoken English Strategies Survey (ASESS) for Non-native English Speaking Graduate Students. Journal of International Students, 2(4), 394-414.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 285-304.

Valadi, A., Rezaee, A., & Kogani, P. (2015). The Relationship between Language Learners’ Willingness to Communicate and Their Oral Language Proficiency with Regard to Gender Differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5), 147-153.

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(5), 495-505.

Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003) A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1) (2003), 18-38.

Yang, S. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.

Yousefi, M., & Kasaian, S. A. (2014). Relationship between willingness to communicate and Iranian EFL learner’s speaking fluency and accuracy. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching; 2(6), 61-72.

Zare, P. (2012). Language learning strategies among EFL/ESL learners: A review of literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 162-169.

Zarei, A. A., & Gilanian, M. (2015). Self-efficacy as a function of language learning. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9(3), 223-235.

Zarrinabadi, Z. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating theEffect of Teacher on Learners’ Willingness to Communicate, System, 42(1), 288-295.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.193

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.