Incorporating Computers into Classroom: Effects on Learners’ Reading Comprehension in EFL Context

Ali Akbar Ansarin, Farahman Farrokhi, Hamid Reza Mahboudi


Owing to the importance of computer-assisted reading and considering the prominent role of learners in this respect, the present study investigated: (1) the effects of computer as a supplemental tool to support and improve the Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension in comparison with equivalent non-technological or traditional print-based treatments, (2) EFL learners’ attitudes and perception towards the computer-assisted reading course.To this purpose, 111 randomly selected groups of EFL learners participated in the study. The subjects were divided into two groups of control and experimental. Both groups received 10 reading lessons either through computers or through an instructor-led method. The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the learners who had access to reading supports on computer screen and their counterparts in the traditional reading classes. Learners were also allowed to express their ideas on a 5-point Likert Scale. The purpose of the attitude questionnaire was to find out more information about the participants and their experiences with computer-assisted reading. Results of attitude questionnaire supported the conclusion that computers may enhance EFL learners’ motivation and interest towards learning but they do not enhance comprehension. The findings of this study support the view that technology should supplement not supplant teachers and that people read less accurately and less comprehensively on screens than on paper.


Computer-assisted reading; traditional reading; EFL learner; attitude

Full Text:



Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in human behavior, 28(5), 1816-1828.

Adamovic, M. (2009). Test document readability calculator. Retrieved from the Online Utility. org website.:

Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2009). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 69- 90). New York: Routledge.

Akyel, A., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English. System, 37(1), 136-152.

Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398.

Alemi, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). The effects of pre-reading activities on ESP reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 569-577

Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1997). Electronic books for secondary students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40, 486–491.

Andrade, M.S. 2009. The Effects of English Language Proficiency on Adjustment to University Life. International Multilingual Research Journal, 3: 16- 34.

Ariew, R., & Erçetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 17, 237-259.

Balajthy, E. (1999). Using computers for intervention and remediation of severely reading-impaired children in a university literacy clinic. Presented at International Reading Association Convention, Microcomputers in Reading Special Interest Group, San Diego, CA.

Beniger, J. R. (1989, January). The evolution of control. In Computers in the human context: Information technology, productivity, and people (pp. 48-70). MIT Press.

Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472.

Birisci, S., Metin, M., & Karakas, M. (2009). Prospective elementary teachers’ attitudes toward computer and Internet use: A sample from Turkey. World Applied Science Journal, 6(10), pp. 1433-1440.

Boyle, F. T. (1998). IBM talking head’s, and our classrooms. College English, 55 (6), pp. 618-626.

Brown, J. (2011). Does the use of technology in the classroom increase students' overall academic performance? (pp. 1-45).

Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: an examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.

Carhill, A., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Páez, M. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1155-1179.

Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL quarterly, 727-752.

Carhill, A., Suarez-Orozco, C., Paez, M. 2008. Explaining English Language Proficiency among Adolescent Immigrant Students. American Educational Research Journal, 45 (4): 1155-1179.

Chapelle, C. A. (2002). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Kaplan, (Ed.). Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 499-505). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chun, D. M. (2001). L2 reading on the web: Strategies for accessing information in hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(5), 367-403.

Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996b). ‘Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia.’ System, 24(4), 503–519.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language learning & technology, 1(1), 60-81.

Clements, D.H., & J. Sarama. (2003). Strip mining for gold: research and policy in educational technology: a response to ‘fool’s gold.’” AACE Journal, 11 (1): 7–69.

Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the internet: Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The reading teacher, 56(5), 458-464.

Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., & Walker, A. J. (2010). Computer anxiety: A comparison of adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Computers & Education, 54(1), 136-145.

Cottrell, S. (1999). The study skills handbook. London: Macmillan Press.

Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Daniel, D. B., & Willingham, D. T. (2012). Electronic textbooks: why the rush? Science, 335, 1569.

Davis, J. N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student abilities. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 58-72.

Delcourt, M. A. B., & Kinzie, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(1), 35-41.

De Ridder, I. (2000). Are we conditioned to follow links? Highlights in CALL materials and their impact on the reading process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 183-195.

Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297-1326.

D’Silva, R. (2006). Reading by bits and bytes: The use of computer reading software in classrooms. English Quarterly, 38(4). Retrieved April 6, 2017 from CBCA Education database.

Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). Handbook for the TOEFL Junior Standard Test. Retrieved April 7, 2017 from

Ferlazzo L. (2016). Why the Death of Paper Books may be Greatly Exaggerated. Retrieved February 22, 2017 from

Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Macmillan.

Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S. & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. Psychology Press.

Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.

Ghenghesh, P. (2015). The Relationship Between English Language Proficiency And Academic Performance of University Students–Should Academic Institutions Really be Concerned? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 91-97.

Glaubke, C. R. (2007). The effects of interactive media on preschoolers’ learning: a review of the research and recommendations for the future. Oakland, CA: Children Now.

Hatch, E. M. (1978). Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Newbury House Pub.

Hartman , D.K. , Morsink , P.M. , & Zheng , J . (2010). From print to pixels: The evolution of cognitive conceptions of reading comprehension. In E.A. Baker (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 131-164). New York, NY: Guilford.

Kenny C. (2013). The false promise of classroom technology. Reading online. Retrieved February 18, 2017, from

Karimi, A., & Mokhtarnia, M. (2004). Barresi avamele mo'aser bar karbord fannaveri ettela'ati va ertebati (ICT) tavasot amoozeshgaran dar honarestanhaie fanni va herfeei keshavarzi: Motale'ei moredi ostane Zanjan [Exploring effective factors influencing Information and Communications Technology (ICT) use by teachers of agricultural technical schools: A case study in Zanjan]. Majalleye Oloum Keshavarzi, 58, 321-332.

Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H., & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 549-577.

Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1-19.

Khoshkar, A., & Nimvari, A. A. E. (2014). The effect of using pictogloss on iranian EFL learners'reading comprehension ability. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(1), 86.

Kingsley, T. (2011). Integrating new literacy instruction to support online reading comprehension: An examination of online literacy performance in 5th grade classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, Muncie, IN.

Klein, J. D. (2010). When you can't bring your classroom to the world, bring the world into your classroom. Youth Media Reporter, 486-88.

Kleinmann, Howard H. (1987).The effect of computer-assisted instruction on ESL reading achievement.The Modern Language Journal, 71(3), 267-276.

Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary: The tool of last resort in foreign language reading: A new perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.

Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PloS one, 8(2), e56178.

Kuiper, E. J. (2007). Teaching web literacy in primary education (Doctoral dissertation, eigen beheer).

Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455-463.

Lenders, O. (2008). Electronic glossing–is it worth the effort? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 457-481.

Lesser, L., & Winsor, M. (2009). English language learners in introductory statistics: Lessons learned from an exploratory case study of two pre-service teachers. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(2), 5-32.

Leu, D. J. (2007, May). What happened when we weren’t looking? How reading comprehension as changed and what we need to do about it. Keynote research address presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Canada.

Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5(1), 1570-1613.

Locke, T., & Andrews, R. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of ICT on literature-related literacies in English 5-16. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language learning & technology, 1(2), 41.

Mahboudi,H.R. (2010). An Anthology of Collegiate Readings. Tabriz: Forouzesh Publications.

Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68.

Mashhadi, M., Rezvanfar, A., & Yaghoubi, J. (2006). Effective factors influencing IT application by agricultural and natural resources faculty members at Tehran University. Faslnameh Pajoohesh va Barnamerizi dar Amouzesh Ali, 44, 151-168.

McDonough, S. H. (1999). Learner strategies. Language teaching, 32(01), 1-18.

Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of learning disabilities, 29(3), 271-279.

Movahed Mohammadi, H. & Iravani, H. (2002). A model for internet use by graduate students of selected agricultural faculties in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4), 717-726.

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 41, 85-139.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media (2012). Technology and Interactive Media as Tools in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. Joint position statement. Washington, DC: NAEYC; Latrobe, PA: Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning at Saint Vincent College. Retrieved from

Navdal, F. (2007). Home-PC usage and achievement in English. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1112-1121.

Nelson, T. (1987). Computer Lib: You can and must understand computers now/Dream Machines: New freedoms through computer screens-a minority report (1974). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism.

Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(1), 153-178.

Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2003). VDT versus paper-based text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31(6), 411-423.

Nunan, D. (1995). Language teaching methodology: a textbook for teachers. New York and London: Phoenix ELT.

Osín, L. (1998). Computers in education in developing countries: Why and how? Education and Technology Team, Human Development Network, World Bank.

Pavio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processing.

Postman, N. (1998). Five things we need to know about technological change. Denver, CO.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Rahimi, A., & Behjat, F. (2011). On The Screen Or Printed: A Case Of EFL Learners' Online And Offline Reading The Press. i-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 5.

Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2011). Success in learning English as a foreign language as a predictor of computer anxiety. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 175-182.

Reinders, H. (2000). Self-access language learning in the English proficiency programme: A report on students’ perceptions and use of independent-learning resources. Wellington: Victoria University Wellington.

Reinders, H., & Hubbard, P. (2012). CALL and autonomy. Affordances and constraints. Contemporary CALL. New York: Continuum.

Rice, G.E., (1994). Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 153–178.

Rasmusson, M. (2015) Reading paper-reading screen. A comparison of reading literacy in two different modes. Nordic Studies in Education, 34, 3-19.

Sakar, A., & Ercetin, G. (2005). Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 28-38.

Selwyn, N. (2011a). ‘It’s all about standardization’-Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473-488.

Selwyn, N. (2011b). Schools and schooling in the digital age: A critical analysis. London: Routledge.

Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge.

Sotoudehnama, E., & Dehghan, H. (2013). The Effect of CALL Software on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. Iranian Journal of Language Issues (IJLI), 1(1).

Spires, H., & Estes, T. H. (2002). Reading in web-based learning environments. In C. C. Block &M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 115-125). New York, NY: Guilford.

Suárez-Orozco, C., Suárez-Orozco, M., & Todorova, I. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tan, M., & Lan, O. S. (2011). Teaching mathematics and science in English in Malaysian classrooms: The impact of teacher beliefs on classroom practices and student learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 5-18.

Teo, T., (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413–424.

Usó, E., & Ruiz-Madrid, M. N. (2009). Reading printed versus online texts. A study of EFL learners strategic reading behavior. International Journal of English Studies, 9(2).

Veerasamy, A.K., Shillabeer, A. (2014). Teaching English Based Programming Courses to English Language Learners/Non-Native Speakers of English. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 70 (4): 17-22

Watson, W. R. (2010). Education 2.0: Breaking the mold with technology. Presentation at the Dean’s Advisory Council meeting, West Lafayette, IN.

Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. Multimedia language teaching, 3-20.

Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the Cloud. Teachers College Press.

Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.

Wästlund, E. (2007). Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition. Department of Psychology.

Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 377-394.

Winograd, P., Paris, S., & Bridge, C. (1991). Improving the assessment of literacy. The Reading Teacher, 45(2), 108-116.

Wolf, G. (1996). Steve Jobs: The next insanely great thing. The Wired interview. Wired, 4(2). Retrieved February 23, 2017 from the World Wide Web:

Wright, S., Fugett, A., & Caputa, F. (2013). Using e-readers and Internet resources to support comprehension. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 367-379.

Yaghoubi, J. & Shamsaei, E. (2004). Assessing effective factors in using internet by faculty members of agricultural college, Zanjan University, Iran. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education (AIAEE), Dublin, Ireland: AIAEE, pp. 604-608.

Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 48-67.

Zhang, Y., & Espinoza, S. (1997). Affiliations of computer self-efficacy and attitudes with need for learning computer skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 371-383.

Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students’ literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 47-87.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.