The Comparative Effect of Teaching Concept Mapping in Reading on Extrovert and Introvert EFL Learners' Self-Regulation

Mania Nosratinia, Fatemeh Abbasi


The present study attempted to compare the effect of teaching concept mapping in reading on extrovert and introvert English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' Self-Regulation (SR). The participants were 60 female EFL learners at the intermediate level of English language proficiency, between 18 and 20 (Mage = 19). The Preliminary English Test was employed in order to select homogeneous participants in terms of English language proficiency level, followed by administering Eysenck's Personality Inventory (1985). The language-wise homogeneous introvert (n = 30) and extrovert (n = 30) participants were assigned randomly into two experimental groups of 30. To identify the pre-treatment and post-treatment levels of participants' SR, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (1991) was administered twice. The two groups were instructed using the same material and implementing Harris and Graham’s (1996) concept mapping instruction model. The analysis of the scores using an Independent-Samples t-Test revealed that extrovert participants exhibited a significantly higher SR level as a result of being exposed to concept mapping. The study concludes with a discussion on the obtained results and the probable reasons leading to them, followed by presenting some implications for EFL teachers, learners, and syllabus designers.



Concept mapping, extroversion, introversion, personality type, reading, self-regulation

Full Text:



Anderson, N. J. (2003). Teaching reading. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 67-86). New York: McGraw Hill Publishers.

Anderson, N. J. ( 2008). Active Reading 3 (3rd ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

Antonioul, F., & Souvignier, E. (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 41-57.

Areglado R. J., Bradley R. C., & Lane P. S. (1996). Learning for life: Creating classrooms for self- directed learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Ashton-Hay, S. (2006) Constructivism and powerful learning environments: Create your own! Paper presented at the 9th International English Language Teaching Convention: The Fusion of Theory and Practice, Middle Eastern Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from

Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-regulatory mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspective on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation (vol.38; pp. 69-146). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Barker, J. R., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Medical students' learning strategies: Evaluation of first year changes. Journal of Educational Psychology , 80, 321-331.

Barker, J. R., & Olsen, J. P. (2002). Medical students learning strategies: Evaluation of first-year changes. Mississippi: University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carnine, L., & Carnine, D. (2004). The interaction of reading skills and science content knowledge when teaching struggling secondary students reading and writing. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 203-218.

Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A. (2002). Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52(2), 401-438.

Cassata-Widera, A. E. (2008). Concept mapping and early literacy: A promising crossroads. In A. J. Caoas, P. Reiska, M. Ehlberg, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators (pp. 123-131). Finland, Tallinn: Estonia & Helsinki.

Chamot, A. U. (2014). Regulated learning in the classroom. Proceedings of CLaSIC, 78-88.

Chang, K., Sung,Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.

Chimielewski, T., & Dansereau, D. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 407-413.

Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2003). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and selfefficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248-263.

Cubukcu, K. M., & Cubukcu, E. (2009). Evaluating higher education policy in Turkey: Assessment of the admission procedure to architecture, planning and engineering schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4(4), 1-13.

D'Apollonia, S., Galley, D., & Simpson, M. (2001). Formal reasoning and conceptual development. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from:

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.

Eysenck, H. J. (1960). The effects of psychotherapy. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Handbook of abnormal psychology: An experimental approach. London: Pitman Medical Publishing.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach, New York: Plenum.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. New York: Crane, Russak & Co.

Fahim, M., & Zaker, A. (2014). EFL learners' creativity and critical thinking: Are they associated? Humanising Language Teaching, 16(3). Retrieved March 9, 2015, from

Gan. Z. (2008). Extroversion and group oral performance: A mixed quantitative and discourse analysis approach. Prospect Journal, 23(3), 24-42.

Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 98-107.

Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

Hauck, M. (2005). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive strategies, and CALL. In J. Egbert & G. Petrie (Eds.), CALL: Research perspectives (pp. 65-86). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Karabenick, S. A. (2001, April). Help seeking in large college classes: Who, why, and from whom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

Kivinen, K. (2002). Assessing motivation and the use of learning strategies by secondary school students in three international schools. Retrieved November 7, 2016, from

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2009). Effect of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students' English reading comprehension. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from

McAleese, R. (1998). The knowledge arena as an extension to the concept map; reflection in action. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(3), 251-272.

Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (1997). Meaningful learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of Knowledge (pp. 405-447). San Diego: Academic Press.

Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2014). Metacognitive attributes and liberated progress: The association among second language learners’ critical thinking, creativity, and autonomy. SAGE Open, 4(3), 1-10. doi: 10.1177/2158244014547178.

Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2015). Boosting autonomous foreign language learning: Scrutinizing the role of creativity, critical thinking, and vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 86-97. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.86.

Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2017). Scrutinizing the impact of teachers' critical thinking and teaching autonomy on their teaching success and learners’ use of language learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 122-132.

Peresich, M. L., Meadows, J. D., & Sinatra, R. (1990). Content area cognitive mapping for reading and writing proficiency. Journal of Reading, 33, 424–429.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MLSQ). Michigan: University of Michigan.

Quintana, J. (2008). PET practice tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667305

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & LaGuardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.) Developmental Psychopathology: Volume 1, theory and methods (2nd Edition, pp. 295‐ 849). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Snow, F. (2002). Reading comprehension defined as a process of simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through interaction and involvement. Retrieved April 19, 2016, from

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Talebinezhad, M. R., & Mousapour Negari, G. (2009). The effect of explicit teaching of concept mapping in expository writing on EFL students' self-regulation. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 49, 85-108.

Tsao, F. F. (2004). Breaking the point of difficulty of teaching English in Taiwan by applying reading education. Journal of English teaching &learning, 28(3), 1-16.

Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: the case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78-102.

Zaker, A. (2015). EFL learners’ language learning strategies and autonomous learning: Which one is a better predictor of L2 skills? Journal of Applied Linguistics-Dubai 1.1, 27-39.

Zaker, A. (2016). Social constructivism and metacognition in an EFL context: Inspecting the contribution of critical thinking to EFL learners’ social intelligence. Humanising Language Teaching, 18(6). Retrieved December 27, 2016, from

Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2009). Motives to self-regulate learning. A social cognitive account. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 247-264). New York: Routledge.

Zittle, F., Johari, A., & Eastmond, D. (2005). The ASTD E-learning handbook: Best practices, strategies and case studies for an emerging field. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 65-71.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.