Effect of Technology Enhanced Language Learning on Vocabulary Acquisition of EFL Learners

Imtiaz Hassan Taj, Fatimah Ali, Muhammad Aslam Sipra, Waqar Ahmad


The study was conducted to investigate the impact of a model, created with the help of computer and mobile phone, on the EFL vocabulary learning of the students at a public university on a Preparatory Year Program. The study used a quasi-experimental pretest posttest control group design. The participants were 122 students in their first year at a public university. Half of them (N = 61) were male and half were female (N = 61). Six weeks treatment period involved vocabulary learning activities presented through PCs in the language laboratory and receiving multi-glossed vocabulary cards on the mobile phones through a social networking mobile phone application WhatsApp. Findings suggested that performance of treatment group was significantly better than that of control group on achievement posttest. The impact of treatment was found gender neutral as male and female participants benefitted from it alike.



MALL, WhatsApp, Technology Assisted Language Learning, EFL vocabulary Instruction, CALL

Full Text:



Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Hussin, Z., Asra, B., & Zakaria, A. R. (2013). MLearning scaffolding model for undergraduate English language learning: bridging formal and informal learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 217-233.

AbuSeileek, A. F. M. (2008). Hypermedia annotation presentation: Learners' preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 260-275.

Al-Jarf, R. (2007). Teaching vocabulary to EFL college students online. CALL-EJ Online, 8(2), 8-2.

Al Shekaili, B. (2016). Investigating teachers’ actual levels of use of WhatsApp application with English foundation and credit program students at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(1), 39-48.

Alavinia, P., & Qoitassi, K. (2013). On the viability of vocabulary learning enhancement through the implementation of MALL: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 412-426.

Alemi, M., Sarab, M. R. A., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99-109.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning.

August, G. (2011). Spelling facilitates good ESL reading comprehension. Journal of Developmental Education, 35(1), 14-24.

Azari, F., Abdullah, F. S., Heng, C. S., & Hoon, T. B. (2012). Effects of glosses on vocabulary gain and retention among tertiary level EFL learners. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533228.pdf

Barrot, J. S. (2013). Revisiting the role of linguistic complexity in ESL reading comprehension. 3L: Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 19(1), 5-18.

Bartlett, F. C., & Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 14): Cambridge University Press.

Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students' English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1-7.

Beechler, S., & Williams, S. (2012). Computer assisted instruction and elementary ESL students in sight word recognition. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(4), 85-92.

Birch, B. M. (2014). English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom: Routledge.

Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Burt, M., Peyton, J. K., & Van Duzer, C. (2005). How should adult ESL reading instruction differ from ABE reading instruction. Center for Adult English Language Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/briefs/readingdif.html

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Cambridge University Press.

Chen, I., & Yen, J. C. (2013). Hypertext annotation: Effects of presentation formats and learner proficiency on reading comprehension and vocabulary learning in foreign languages. Computers & Education, 63, 416-423.

Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., & Kinshuk, A. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 93-113.

Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE bulletin, 49, 3-6.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Demouy, V., & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning, 25(3), 217-232.

Dina, A. T., & Ciornei, S. I. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of computer assisted language learning and teaching for foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 248-252.

Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1978). Remarks on creativity in language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 65-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(02), 197-216.

Ecalle, J., Kleinsz, N., & Magnan, A. (2013). Computer-assisted learning in young poor readers: The effect of grapho-syllabic training on the development of word reading and reading comprehension. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1368-1376.

Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., & Calmus, C. (2009). Lasting effects on literacy skills with a computer-assisted learning using syllabic units in low-progress readers. Computers & Education, 52(3), 554-561.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gorjian, B. (2012). Teaching Vocabulary through Web-Based Language Learning (WBLL) Approach. Procedia Technology, 1, 334-339.

Han, Z., & Chen, C. L. A. (2010). Repeated-reading-based instructional strategy and vocabulary acquisition: A case study of a heritage speaker of Chinese. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(2), 242-262.

Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Using short message service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 66-81.

Hirschel, R., & Fritz, E. (2013). Learning vocabulary: CALL program versus vocabulary notebook. System, 41(3), 639-653.

Hussain, M. (2011). The effect of mediated glosses on vocabulary retention and reading comprehension with English language learners in Saudi Arabia. (Doctral Dissertation), University of Kansas, USA.

Jarvis, H. (2015). From PPP and CALL/MALL to a praxis of task-based teaching and mobile assisted language use. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Electronic Journal, 19(1), 1-10.

Jarvis, H., & Achilleos, M. (2013). From computer assisted language learning (CALL) to mobile assisted language use (MALU). TESL-EJ, 16(4), 1-18.

Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, H. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55(1), 209-217.

Jones, R. G. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.

Kang, Y., Kang, H. S., & Park, J. (2012). Is it vocabulary breadth or depth that better predict Korean EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Teaching, 67(4), 149-171.

Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31-57.

Kim, H. S. (2011). Effects of SMS text messaging on vocabulary learning. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 159-180.

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning: Oxford University Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. UK: Oxford Pergamon.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271-289.

Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: an experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277-290.

Lems, K., Miller, L. D., & Soro, T. M. (2009). Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from linguistics. New York: Guilford Press.

Lin, C. C., Hsiao, H. S., Tseng, S. p., & Chan, H. j. (2014). Learning English vocabulary collaboratively in a technology-supported classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 162-173.

Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515-525.

Marzban, A. (2011). Investigating the role of multimedia annotations in EFL reading comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 72-77.

Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309-319.

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Moinzadeh, A., & Moslehpour, R. (2012). Depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge: Which really matters in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), 1015-1026.

Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013). Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41(3), 720-739.

Morris, N. O. (2011). Using technology in the EFL classroom in Saudi Arabia. DigitalCollections@SIT, 1(1), 1-51.

Motallebzadeh, K., & Ganjali, R. (2011). SMS: Tool for L2 vocabulary retention and reading comprehension ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1111-1115.

Mustafa, H. R., Sain, N., & Razak, N. Z. A. (2012). Using Internet for learning vocabulary among second language learners in a suburban school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 425-431.

Nation, P., & Meara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Arnold.

Nikoopour, J., & Kazemi, A. (2014). Vocabulary Learning through Digitized & Non-digitized Flashcards Delivery. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1366-1373.

Oz, H. (2015). An investigation of preservice English teachers’ perceptions of mobile assisted language learning. English Language Teaching, 8(2), 22-35.

Palalas, A. (2011). Mobile-assisted language learning: Designing for your students. In S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers. Dublin, Ireland: Research-publishing.net.

Plana, M. G. C., Gimeno, A., Appel, C., & Hopkins, J. (2013). Improving learners’ reading skills through instant short messages: A sample study using WhatsApp. Paper presented at the 4th World CALL Conference, Glasgow.

Rezaee, A. A., & Shoar, N. S. (2011). Investigating the effect of using multiple sensory modes of glossing vocabulary items in a reading text with multimedia annotations. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 25-34.

Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334-1347.

Soars, L., Soars, J., & Wheeldon, S. (2014). New headway intermediate student's book: Oxford University Press.

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.

Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning.

Valk, J. H., Rashid, A. T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 117-140.

Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social research update(35), 1-4.

Willis, J. (2008). Teaching the brain to read: Strategies for improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. USA: ASCD Publications.

Wong, L. H. (2012). A learner‐centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 19-23.

Wu, Q. (2015). Pulling mobile assisted language learning (MALL) into the mainstream: MALL in broad practice. PloS One, 10(5), 1-12.

Yang, J. (2013). Mobile assisted language learning: Review of the recent applications of emerging mobile technologies. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 19-25.

Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Kansas. Retrieved from


Zaharna, R. S. (1995). Understanding cultural preferences of Arab communication patterns. Public Relations Review, 21(3), 241-255.

Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203-214.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.262


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.