Impact of Audio-viewing Materials on Iranian Upper-Intermediate EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension
Abstract
Listening comprehension serves as a precursor to speaking and thus it is essentially important in learning a second language. How listening comprehension of EFL learners can be ameliorated has long been an obsession for L2 teachers. This study intended to 1) examine whether the listening comprehension of Iranian upper intermediate EFL learners was significantly influenced by audio viewing materials, and 2) find out whether variables such as age and gender could affect the learners’ listening abilities. To meet the objectives of the study, 40 L2 learners studying English at several language institutes in Shahreza were selected, and were included in the study after taking part in an OPT. The participants were then divided into two groups of equal size i.e. the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). While the former was exposed to the treatment (i.e. audio viewing materials), learners in the latter listened without having access to the scripts. Scores obtained from pretest and posttest enabled the researcher to conduct independent-samples t test as well as multiple regression analysis, and come up with the following results: 1) While the level of listening comprehension of the two groups was roughly equal at the beginning of the study, the EG learners outperformed the CG learners on the listening comprehension posttest, which could be attributed to the treatment they were provided with (i.e. access to audio viewing materials), and 2) Multiple regression analysis revealed that the only independent variable which could exert significant influences on the learners’ listening comprehension was their access to audio viewing materials, and that gender and age could not significantly affect the learners’ listening comprehension scores. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for language teaching.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bacon, S.M. (1992a). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76, 160-178.
Barker, L., Edwards, R., Gaines, C., Gladney, K., & Holley, F. (1980). An investigation of proportional time spent in various communication activities by college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 8, 101-110.
Barker, L., & Brown, A.L. Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Bruce, B. (1993). Innovation and social change. In B. Bruce, J.K. Peyton & T.
Byrnes, H. (1984). The Role of Listening Comprehension: A Theoretical Base. Foreign Language Annals 17:317-29.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-573.
Carter, R., Nunan, D. (2002). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Chamot, A.U. & O'Malley, J.M. (1987). A cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-49.
Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L.(1989). Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction. Foreign Language Annals 22(1):13 – 22.
Coakley, C., & Wolvin, A. (1997). Listening in the educational environment. In M. Purdy & D. Borisoff (Eds.), Listening in everyday life: A personal and professional approach (2nd ed.) (pp. 179-212). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
De Bot K, Lowie W, Verspoor M. 2005. Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge
Dehghani., A. , & Jowkar., M. (2012). The Impact of Computer-Video Projector on EFL Learners' Learning Listening Comprehension. Academic Research International,3(1), 14-26.
Devine, T. G. (1982). Teaching study skills. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunkel, P. (1991b). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 431-457.
Erfani, M., Iranmehr, A., & Davari, H. (2011). Deepening ESP reading comprehension through visualization. Journal ofLanguage Teaching and Research, 2(1), 270-273.
Ferris, D. (1998). Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 289-318.
Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic listening/speaking tasks for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 297-320.
Feyten, C. M. (1991). The Power of Listening Ability: An Overlooked Dimension in Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 75:173-80.
Fischer, F. and Farris, M. (1995). The Libra Multimedia Authoring Environment and CALL Multimedia Courseware. Southwest Texas State University.
Gilbert, M. B. (1988). Listening in school: I know you can hear me--But are you listening? Journal of the International Listening Association, 2, 121-132.
Goh, C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124-147. Retrieved from
http://www.arnoldpublishers.com/journals/pages/lan%5Ftea/13621688.htm
Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems, Systems, 28, 55-75. Retrieved from http://0-dx.doi.org.catalog.library.colostate.edu/10.1016/S0346 -251X(99)000603
Henner-Stanchina, C. (1987). Autonomy as met acognitive awareness: suggestions for training self-monitoring on listening comprehension. M’elanges P’edagogiques 17. Universite de Nancy 2: CRAPEL.
Kavaliauskienė, G. (2008). Podcasting: A tool for improving listening skills. Teaching English with Technology. Vol 8, issue 4. http://www.tewtjournal.org
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Applications of psycholinguistic research to the classroom. In C. James (Ed.), Practical applications of research in foreign language teaching (pp.51-66). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Teaching Techniques in English as a Second Language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-435574-2.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
Leloup, J., & Ponterio, R. (2003). Addressing the need for electronic communication in foreign language teaching. In R. Steinfeldt. Educational Technologies—monograph of the New York State Council of Educational Associations
Moncada, A. (2006). On materials use training in EFL teacher education: some reflections. Retrieved August 22, 2008, from
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657
Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Moncada, V. (2008). Do classroom exemplars promote the application of principles in teacher education? A comparison of videos, animations, and narratives. Educational Technology Research & Development 56: 449-65.
Morley, J. (1999). Current perspectives on improving aural comprehension. http://www.eslmag.com/MorleyAuralStory.html (26 Feb. 1999).
Mousavi, A., IravaniH.(2012). The effect of authentic versus non-authentic aural materials on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 21-27. doi:10.5539/ells.v2n1p21
Murphy, J. M. (1991). Oral communication in TESOL: Integrating speaking, listening, and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 51-75.
Murphy, J.M. (1985). An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED278275).
Mutar, S. S. (2009). The effect of using technical audio-visual aids on learning technical English language at technical institute. Misan Journal of Academic Studies, 8(15), 1-12.
Nunan, D (2002). Listening in a second language. The English Centre, University of Hong Kong. Retrieved September 18- 2008. From: http://www.jaltpublications.org/tlt/articles/2003/07/nunan
Nunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in Language Learning. (Accessed on May 5, 2011 at http://ec.hku.hk/dcnunan/)
O’Malley, J. M. (1989). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 133–144). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice/Hall International.
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U., (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O‗Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students.Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2012). EFL teachers’ beliefs toward using computer technology in English language teaching. Journal Of Studies In Education, 2(2), 62-80.Doi:10.5296/jse.v2i2.1174.
Richards, Jack (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-32093-1.
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78: 199-221.
Rubin, J. (1988). Improving Foreign Language Listening Comprehension. ERIC Clearinhhouse on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: US Dept of Education.
Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schema: The basic building blocks of cognition. In: R. Spiro, B. Brice & W. Brewer. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Safarali, k. S. & Hamidi, H. (2012). The impact of videos presenting speakers' gestures and facial clues on Iranian EFL learners' listening comprehension.International Journal ofApplied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 106-114. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.106.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: the individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3): 365–398.
Szendeffy, J. (2005). A Practical Guide to Using Computers in Language Teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Truesdale, S. P. (1990). Whole-body listening: Developing active auditory skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 183-184.
Vandergrift, L. (1998). Successful and less successful learners in French: What are thestrategy differences: The French Review, 71, 370-395. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/398969
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Listening: theory and practice in modern foreign language competence. Retrieved January 4, 2009, from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/67
Van Duzer C. (1998), Improving ESL Learners ‘Listening Skills: At the Workplace and Beyond. Washington D.C.
http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/LISTENQA.html
Vogely, A. (1998). Listening comprehension anxiety: students’ reported sources and solutions. Foreign Language Annals 31 (1): 67-80
Wing, B. H. (Ed.). (1986). Listening, reading, writing: Analysis and application. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Language.
Winged, J. A. (1953). Strategies for teaching second language listening comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 345-348.
Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. (1988). Listening (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.7p.132
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.