Integrating Multiple and Focused Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension and L2 Lexical Development of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners

Mehdi Nasri, Reza Biria

Abstract


Effective reading is essential for success in learning a foreign language. EFL learners, therefore, need to master a number of reading strategies to be able to comprehend text information. Strategic reading research has already evidenced the possibility of teaching comprehension strategies to enhance learner’ comprehension and metacognitive abilities. Further research is needed though to examine the procedures or methodologies through which the approach can be applied. This pretest-posttest quasi-experimental article aimed, firstly, to compare the effects of the two widespread methods of explicit teaching of comprehension strategies (focused vs. multiple) on EFL learner’ reading comprehension and lexical development and, secondly, to explore whether or not integration of fixed and multiple instructional techniques significantly improved intermediate EFL learners reading comprehension ability and lexical knowledge. To this end, four intact classes including 69 intermediate EFL learners in a language center in Isfahan were randomly assigned to one control and three experimental groups. The groups received the same amount of instruction, however differently, three receiving focused, multiple, and integrated strategy interventions respectively and the other receiving conventional reading-based instruction. The results revealed that while receiving focused strategy intervention did not offer a statistically significant advantage over the typical classroom setting, benefiting from multiple strategy intervention significantly improved the learners’ ability in reading comprehension. Moreover, the results asserted the efficacy of integrated strategy instruction in improving both reading comprehension and lexical development among Iranian intermediate EFL learners.

 


Keywords


Focused strategy instruction, Lexical development, Multiple strategy instruction, Reading comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40.6

Arpacıoğlu, E. B. (2007). The effect of combined strategy instruction on reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ankara: Bilkent University Graduate School of Education.

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook for reading research. New York, NY: Longman, 353-394.

Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Brown, J. D. (1981). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge University Press.

Caccamise, D., & Snyder, L. (2005). Theory and Pedagogical Practices of Text Comprehension. Topics in language disorders, 25(1), 5-20.

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5-6), 489-503.

Cubukcu, F. (2008). How to enhance reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The Journal of International Social Research, 1(2), 83-93.

DeBoer, S. R. (2003). Role of Explicit Teaching of Cognitive/Metacognitive Reading Strategies to Improve Reading Comprehension at the Elementary Level. Unpublished master’s thesis. Dordt College Department of Education.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), what research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242), IRA, Newark, DE?

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd edn., vol. 3). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 205-242.

Duke, N. K., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorder (pp. 501-520). New York: Guildford.

Fan, H. (2009). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategies in facilitating Taiwanese university learners in EFL reading comprehension. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.

Far, M. M. (2006). On the relationship between ESP & EGP: A general perspective. English for Specific Purposes World, 7(1), 1-11.

Goldenberg, C. (2011). Reading instruction for English language learners. In M. L.

Grabe, W. (2002). Dilemmas for the development of second language reading abilities. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 276-286.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3-26.

Graves, M. (2004). Theories and constructs that have made a significant difference in adolescent literacy—but have the potential to produce still more positive benefits. In T. L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 433–452). New York: The Guilford Press.

Janzen, J. (2003). Developing strategic readers in elementary school. Reading Psychology, 24.1, 25-55. doi: 10.1080/02702710390147016.

Kazemi, M., Hosseini,M., & Kohandani, M. (2013). Strategic Reading Instruction in EFL Contexts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2333-2342.

Krashen, S. D. (1989). Language acquisition and language education: Extensions and applications. Prentice Hall International.

Langer, J. A. (2002). Effective literacy instruction: Building successful reading and writing programs. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Lee, L., & Gundersen, E. (2000). Select Readings: Teacher-approved readings for today’s students (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McLaughlin, and Allen (2009) Guided Comprehension in Grades 3–8, and Revisit, Reflect, Retell by Hoyt (2009).

Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading research quarterly, 233-253.

Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Nation K., & Norbury, F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in language disorders, 25, 21–32.

National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Nokes, J. D. & Dole, J. A. (2004). Helping adolescent readers through explicit strategy instruction. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 162-182). New York: The Guilford Press.

Phakiti, A. (2006). Theoretical and pedagogical issues in ESL/EFL teaching of strategic reading. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1, 19-50.

Philips, D. (1996). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test. London: Longman.

Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd edn.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Pressley, M. & Afferbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486-488.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roe, M. F. (2008). The ways teachers do the things they do: Differentiation in middle level literacy classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(3), 39-53.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary learning strategies. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 199227.

K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 173-182). New York: Guilford Press.

Shang, H. F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18-42.

Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Our research program validating the tribrachic theory of successful intelligence: Reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31(4), 399-413.

Swanson, D. R. (2001). Searching natural language text by computer. Science, 132(3434), 1099-1104.

Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 291-329.

Yee, N. (2010). Understanding reading comprehension: multiple and focused strategy interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Material thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

Williams, J. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 6-18.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.311

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.