Colligations of Prepositions: Essential Properties of Legal Phraseology

Kamariah Yunus, Su’ad Awab, Radzuwan Ab Rashid


Specialised discourses manifest the organising thoughts of the discourse community that speaks the language.  They are formed by a series of interrelated linguistic properties that are joined in sentences by small but very important lexico-grammatical properties - colligations of prepositions. This paper reviewed the linguistic properties that constitute these linguistic patterns (colligations of prepositions) as well as their semantic and pragmatic functions in legal discourse. The literature reveals that prepositions have both the lexical and grammatical statuses. They are prevalent in legal texts, and they play very important role in conveying the thoughts of the discourse community of the law. Proficient linguistic users are marked by having competence of these patterns. Due to the importance of colligations of prepositions in legal discourse, it is recommended that law students and legal scholars be taught colligations of prepositions explicitly rather than learning them implicitly. 


Prepositions, colligations, semantic functions, legal discourse, genre

Full Text:



Akmajian, A. (1995). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Alcaraz, E., & Hughes, B. (2002). Legal translation explained. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

Allerton, D. (1982): Valency and the English verb. London/New York: Academic Press.

Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1986). The BBI combinatory dictionary of English: A guide to word combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1997). The BBI dictionary of English word combination (revised ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V.K. (1998). Intertextuality in legal discourse. The Language Teacher. Retrieved 12 May 1999, from

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English. London: Arnold.

Bordet, L., & Jamet, D. (2010). Are English prepositions lexical or grammatical morphemes? Cercles, Occasional Papers, 1-26. Retrieved 23 February, 2012, from

Carter, R. (1987). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishing Company.

Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) & Contracts (Amendment) Act 1976 (A329). Batu Caves, Selangor: Penerbitan Akta (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law & Society Review, 14(3), 447-564.

Danet, B. (1985). Legal Discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (vol . 1, pp. 237–291). London: Academic Press.

Dirven, R. (1993). Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual catogories by means of English prepositions. In C. Zelinsky-wibbelt (Eds.), Natural language processing: The semantics of prepositions (pp. 73-97). The Hague: Moyten de Gruyter.

Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Durrant, P. (2009). Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 157–169.

Essberger, J. (2009). English prepositions listed. Retrieved 12 October 1999, from

Firth, J. R. (1957a). Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth (Eds.), Papers in linguistics, 1934-1951 (pp. 190-215). London: Oxford University Press.

Firth, J.R. (1957b). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. In J. R. Firth (Eds.), Studies in linguistic analysis (pp. 1-32). Oxford: Philological Society.

Flowerdew, L. (2009). Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy: A critical evaluation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistic, 14(3), 393–417.

Fuentes, A. C. (2001). Lexical behavior in academic and technical corpora: Implications for ESP development. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3), 106-129.

Gibbons, J. (1994). Language of the law. London: Longman.

Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Gledhill, C. J. (2009). Colligation and the cohesive function of present and past tense in the scientific research article. In D. Banks (Eds.), Les Temps et les textes de spécialité (pp. 65-84). Paris: L’Harmattan.

Gledhill, C. J. (2011). The ‘lexicogrammar’ approach to analysing phraseology and collocation in ESP texts, ASp 59, 5-23.

Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. (eds.) (2001). Small corpus studies and ELT. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. (2003). PALC’03 Abstracts from the Fourth International Conference on Practical Applications in Language Corpora. Lódz: Lódz University Press.

Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. (2004). Multi-word lexical units in legal genres: The pedagogic perspective. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), Practical applications in language and computers (PALC 2003) (pp. 401-413). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended projection. Manuscript: Brandeis University.

Gustaffson, M. (1975). Some syntactic properties of English law language. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Department of English.

Gustaffson, M. (1984). The syntactic features of binomial expressions in legal English. Text, 4(1-3), 123-141.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1970b). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Eds.), New horizon in Linguistics (pp. 140-165). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, M., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K, & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

Harris, S. (1997). Procedural vocabulary in law case reports. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 289-308.

Hiltunen, R. (1990). Chapters on legal English. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hunston, S. (2008). Starting with small words. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(3), 271-295.

Hunston, S., & G. Francis (2000). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Jabbour-Lagocki, J. (1990). Prepositions of position: An analysis for practical application in the classroom. Eric Document Reproduction Service No.: 332 509.

Jones, A., & McCracken, S. (2006). Teaching the discourse of legal risk to finance professionals: Preliminary steps and emerging issues in developing a linguistically scaffolded curriculum. Retrieved 13 February 2010, from paper 15 Sept 06.pdf

Kamariah Yunus., Mahani Mohamad., & Borden Waelateh. (2016). The breadth of receptive vocabulary knowledge among English major university students. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 1(1), 7-17.

Kjaer, A. L (2007). Phrasemes in legal texts. In H. Burger (Eds.), Phraseology: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 506-616). Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Company.

Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical thresholds for reading comprehension: What they are and how they can be used for teaching purposes, Tesol Quarterly, 47(4), 867-872.

Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Language Teaching Productions.

Lewis, M. (2000). Language in the Lexical Approach. In M. Lewis (Eds.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the Lexical Approach (pp.126-154). Hove: Language Teaching Productions.

Lindstromberg, S. (1998). English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

Littlefield, H. A. (2011). Lexical and functional prepositions in acquisition: Evidence for a hybrid category. Retrived 22 April, 2012 from

Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law. Boston: Little Brown Co.

Mitchell, T.F. (1971). Linguistic 'goings-on': Collocations and other lexical matters arising on the syntagmatic record. Archivum Linguisticum, 2, 35-69.

Mitchell, T.F. (1975). Principles of Firthian linguistics. London: Longmans.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language (general grammar). Harlow: Longman.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J. (1989). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Rankin, T., & Schiftner, B. (2009). The use of marginal and complex prepositions in learner English. In Mahlberg, M., V. González-Díaz, & C. Smith (Eds.). Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Liverpool, 20-23 July 2009. Retrieved 20 February 2012, from

Rauh, G. (1993). On the grammar of lexical and non-lexical prepositions in English. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Eds.), The semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing (pp. 99-150). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Roberts, P. (1954). University grammar. New York: Longmans Group Ltd.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair, J. M. H. (1991a). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Sinclair, J. M. H. (2004a). Trust the text. In Sinclair, J. M. H. & R. Carter (Eds.), Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse (pp. 9-23). London: Routledge.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, J. R. (1993). Prepositions: Patterns of polysemization and strategies of disambiguation. In C. Zelinsk-Wibbelt (Eds.), Natural language processing: The semantics of prepositions (vol. 3) (pp.151-175). The Hague: Mouten de Gruyter.

Thorne, S. (1997). Mastering English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tiersma, P.M. (1999). Legal language. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Vedralova, L. (2008). Complex repositions in EU legislation and their translation equivalents. Unpublished master’s thesis, Masaryk University, Czechoslavakia.

Wei, L. (2010). Specifying context: A way to decoding legal language. The Asian ESP Journal [Special Edition] (pp. 58-68).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.