An Effective Supervisory Model to Help MA English Students in the Process of Writing Their Thesis

Hamid Rahmani Sangani, Seyed Iman Bassir, Latifah Jalali

Abstract


Conducting a research project and writing up a thesis could be as nearly demanding as it is essential for MA students to achieve their academic goals, particularly in developing world contexts such as Iran. One main reason for this, as experienced by some of the students, is the insufficient and inefficient guidance which the students receive from their supervisors. Meanwhile, the initial review of the available documents and syllabi in our context, Iran, demonstrated that there are no transparent comprehensive guidelines recommended for the supervisor-student relationships. In order to respond to these challenges, a multiple-case study, including four cases, was designed. Each of the four cases consisted of one MA TEFL student who was guided by a supervisory team including two of the three supervisors. The team members held their consulting sessions for each student individually. Each of the students’ activities and interactions were considered and reflected on regularly by the supervisory team in order to explore the challenges the students and their supervisors encountered and then to propose responses to them. The students were regularly interviewed about the efficiency of the whole process of the supervision, particularly the suggested responses and changes, to detect its successes and failures. An ongoing thematic analysis was used to analyse the collected data. The process helped the researchers, who were also the participants, to develop a supervisory model which hopefully facilitates the process of writing an MA thesis. The findings could be immensely helpful for the syllabus designers and supervisory teams as well as MA and PhD students.

 


Keywords


Supervisor-Student Relationship, Supervisory Model, EL Students, MA Research, Thesis Writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azman, H., Mohd Nor, N. F., Mohd Nor, N. F., & Aghwela, H. O. M. (2014). Investigating supervisory feedback practices and their impact on international research student’s thesis development: A case study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 152-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.028

Burgess, R. G. (Ed,) (1994). Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences: Processes and products. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.

Deem, R. & Brehony, K. (2000). Doctoral students' access to research cultures: Are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149 -165.

de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, T., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2011). Master's thesis supervision: Relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 925-939.DOI:10. 1080/03075079.2011.556717

de Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relation between feedback perceptions and the supervisor–student relationship in master's thesis projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 336-349. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.860109.

Delamont, S., Parry, O., & Atkinson, P. (1998). Creating a delicate balance: The doctoral supervisor’s dilemmas. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(2), 157-172. DOI: 10.1080/1356215980030203.

Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 31(3), 299-318. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600680562.

Edge, J. (1992). Co-operative development. ELT Journal, 46(1), 62-70.

Edge, J. (2001). Action research. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Edge, J. (2002). Continuing cooperative development: A discourse framework for individuals as colleagues. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Edge, J. (2006). Computer-mediated cooperative development: Non-judgmental discourse in online environments. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 205-227.

Garcia, M. E., Malott, R. W., & Brethover, D. (1988). A system of thesis and dissertation supervision: Helping graduate students succeed. Teaching of Psychology, 15(4), 186-191. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top1504_2.

Gatfield, T. (2005). An Investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311-325. DOI: 10.1080/13600800500283585

Lee, A., & Green, B. (Eds.) (1998). Postgraduate studies, postgraduate pedagogy. Sydney: Centre for Language and Literacy.

Lindén, J. (1999). The contribution of narrative to the process of supervising PhD students. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 351-369. DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379945.

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Sangani, H. R. (2009). How reflective practice impacts on English writing teachers in a particular context in Iran Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Manchester, United Kingdom.

Sangani, H. R. (2012). Post-method and Muslim EL teachers. Paper presented at the First Conference on Language Learning & Teaching: An Interdisciplinary Approach (LLT - IA). Mashhad: Ferdowsi University. Retrieved from http://confnews.um.ac.ir/images/41/conferences/llt/cd36.pdf

Sangani, H. R., & Stelma, J. (2012). Reflective practice in developing world contexts: A general review of literatureand a specific consideration of an Iranian experience. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 113-129.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. Y., & Yunus, F. W. (2014). Postgraduate supervision: Comparing student perspectives from Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 151-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1409

Styles, I., & Radloff, A. (2001). The synergistic thesis: Student and supervisor perspectives. Journal of Further andHigher Education, 25(1), 97-106. DOI: 10.1080/03098770020030533

Yeatman, A. (1995). Making supervision relationships accountable: Graduate student logs. Australian Universities’Reviews, 2, 9-11.

Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Ryan, Y. (1994). Quality in postgraduate education. London: Kogan Page.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.