A Corpus-based Comparative Study of Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Marine Engineering and Maritime Legal Regulation English

Xuehua Wu, Xueying Cai

Abstract


Grammatical metaphor is one of the language phenomena introduced by Halliday (2004) in the framework of functional grammar. This paper used Halliday’s metafunctional framework in marine engineering and maritime legal regulation English discourses under Prichard’s category (2003) of English for occupational purposes and English for academic purposes respectively. The analysis of data was conducted through a description of English occupational and academic texts, based on grammatical metaphor. The researcher conducted some statistical analysis, including frequency and percentage of ideational grammatical metaphor and its different processes of transitivity in both genres. Finally, two genres of English texts were compared statistically to show in what aspect they are significantly different or similar. The results obtained indicate that the two genres bear more similarities than differences in terms of using the nominalization of ideational grammatical metaphor. In other words, while indicating genre differences, the study proves their functional similarities in using the material process types more than other process types to convey meaning, however marine engineering English applies a little less frequency of material and relational process. Some behavior process types were found in marine engineering English texts but no behavior processes were found in marine legal English. Maritime legal English applies small amount of existential process and mental process while in marine engineering English these two types of process were not found. Both genres apply ideational metaphor to condense the information and increase the complexity of sentence structure.

 


Keywords


Ideational grammatical metaphor, nominalization, process, marine engineering English, maritime legal regulation English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Edward Arnold.

Chinese Maritime Service Center (2012). Maritime engineering English. Dalian, China: Dalian Maritime College Press.

Dong J. (2013). Interpersonal metaphor in legal discourse: Modality in cross-examinations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1311-1321. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.6.1311- 1321.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1999). The language of early childhood. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthessen, C. N. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Liu Y. H. (2001). On congruence. Journal of Foreign Languages, 6, 43-48.

Jamshid I. (2005). Grammatical metaphor. Retrieved from www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/13590 grammaticalmetaphor

Jones, J., S. Gollin, H., & D. Economou, (1989). “Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL curriculum”, in Hasan, R. and Martin, J.R. (Eds), Language development: Learning, language, learning culture (pp. 257-328). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pritchard B. (2003). Maritime English syllabus for the modern seafarer: Safety-related or comprehensive courses? WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2(2), 149-166.

Ravelli, J. L. (2003). Renewal of connection: integrating theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor. In A. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers, & J. L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Skorcynska H. (2003). Metaphor in scientific business journals and business periodicals: An example of the scientific discourse popularization. Iberica, 3,43-60. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287026294004

Tabrizi F., & Nabifar N. (2013). A comparative study of ideational grammatical metaphor in health and political texts of English newspapers. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 3(1), 32-51.

Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Arnold /Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

To V., Lê Q., & Lê T. (2015). Applying Halliday’s linguistic theory in qualitative data analysis, Qualitative Research Journal, 15(2), 135 - 146. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QRJ11-2014-0059




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.76

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.