Pragmatic Analyses of President Goodluck Jonathan’s Concession Speech and General Muhammadu Buhari’s Acceptance Speech: A Comparative Appraisal

Léonard A. Koussouhon, Servais D. Y. Dadjo

Abstract


Drawing on Austin’s (1962) Speech Act Theory, this paper investigates President Goodluck Jonathan’s Concession Speech and General Muhammadu Buhari’s Acceptance Speech for the purpose of examining the impacts of context and evaluating their effects on Nigerians. The application of Speech Act Theory to these political discourses has revealed valuable findings. To mention but a few, this study has shown a high proportion of claiming assertive speech acts in Jonathan’s speech indicating thus how unity, stability and progress of Nigeria depends on Jonathan who has excellently proved this by conceding victory to his opponent Buhari. This has been confirmed by the very low proportion of these acts in Buhari’s speech. Furthermore, Jonathan’s acts of thanking, congratulating and praising indicate not only his high degree of recognition, attachment to peace and democracy but also his magnanimity whereas those of Buhari indicate his degree of recognition. Through the use of directive speech acts both Jonathan and Buhari have proved to be law abiding and peaceful. Through the use of commissive speech acts Jonathan has proved to be democratic and patriotic whereas Buhari has proved to be open, cooperative and democratic.  The thoughtful performance of the different speech acts has enabled both speakers especially Jonathan to maintain peace and stability in Nigeria.

 


Keywords


Illocutionary act, locutionary act, perlocutionary act, pragmatics, speech act

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Buhari’s Acceptance Speech. (2015, April 1). Nigerian Muse. Retrieved from http://www.nigerianmuse.com

Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Eka, D. (2000). Elements of Grammar and Mechanics of English Language. Uyo: Samuf (Nigeria) Limited.

Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Jonathan’s Concession Speech. (2015, April 1). Nigerian Muse. Retrieved from: http://www.nigerianmuse.com

Korta K. & Perry, J. (2006). Pragmatics (Stamford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Retrieved December 11, 2015 from http://www.grammar.about.com

Leech G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.

Mey, J. (2009). Concise Encyclopaedia of Pragmatics 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier.

Nordquist, R. (2015). Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms. Retrieved December 17, 2015 from http://www.plato.stamford.edu/entries/pragmatics

Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848

Watson, J. R. & Hill, A. (1993). A dictionary of Communication and Media Studies. London: Longman.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (1997). The Study of Language. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.4p.12

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.