Do We Know More About Whorf?

Yanlong Wang

Abstract


The idea that different languages foster different world views in their speakers is part of a tradition popularized by Wilhelm von Humboldt in the 18th century long before it became associated with Whorf.  In this long process, another two American linguists, Boas and Sapir, are also well-known for their great contributions to this notion.  This paper tries to trace the linguistic relativity back to its origin and contextualize its diachronic developments from Europe to America.  It is true, however, that it was Benjamin Lee Whorf, the chemical engineer and fire-insurance by profession and the linguist by avocation, who had undertaken extensive research into the language Hopi during 1932-1935 and Maya in late 1930s, and it was he who went further in indicating the relationship between language and thought.  As a core part of Whorf’s theory complex, the linguistic relativity was once interpreted in two ways: linguistic determinism which means that language determines the way people think and linguistic relativism which implies that language influences the way people think. 


Keywords


Whorf, Whorf’s theory, linguistic relativity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic colour terms: their university and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press

Brown, R. W. (1976). In memorial tribe to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition, 4, 125-153

Brown, R. W., & Lenneberg, E. H. (1954). A study in language and cognition. Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 49, 454-462.

Carroll, D. W. (2008). Psychology of language. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Ding, Y. R. (2009). A western philosophy of language: A guide for students of linguistics. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Foley, W. A. (2001). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Garnham,A. & Oakhill, J. (1994). Thinking and reasoning. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gumperz, J. J.,& Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Herder, E. R. (1972). Universals in colour naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 10-20.

Hockett, C. F. (1954). Chinese versus English: An exploration of the Whorfian theses. In H. Hoijer (Ed.), language in culture (pp. 106-123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

House, J. (2000). Linguistic relativity and translation. In M. Putz & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (PP. 69-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Koerner, E. F. K. (2000). Towards a ‘full pedigree’ of the ‘Sapir-Whorf hypothesis’: From Locke to Lucy. In M. Putz & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (PP. 1-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lee, P. (1996). The Whorf theory complex. Amsterdam and Philedelaphia: John Benjamins.

Lee, P. (2000). When is ‘linguistic relativity’ Whorf’s linguistic relativity? In M. Putz & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (PP. 45-68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lenneberg, E. H. & Roberts, J. M. (1956). The language of experience. Memoir 13, University of Indiana Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics.

Liu, R. Q. & Feng, Z. X. (2002). The theories and schools of linguistics. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press.

Lucy, J. A. (1992a). Language diversity and thought: A reformation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Sapir, E. (1929). The study of language as a science. Language, 5, 207-214

Tohidian, I. (2009). Examining linguistic relativity hypothesis as one of the main views on the relationship between language and thought. Psycholinguist Res, 38, 65-74.

Wardhaugh, R. (2000). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Yao,X.P. [姚小平],2002,人类语言家沃尔夫的遗产—读《论语言、思维和现实》,《外语教学与研究》(1):75-77.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.215

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.