Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Comparative Arabic and English Literacy: A Study of Female University Students' Practices in Saudi Arabia
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of Arabic and English literacy skills and practices for Saudi female university students at their homes and at their school as indicated by the students themselves using literacy questionnaires. The study did not evaluate the proficiency of the students in any aspect of the language such as phonology, vocabulary, or grammar but rather compiled students' answers to the availability of literacy resources in English and in Arabic in their homes/school and the students' practices of literacy in both languages. Data was gathered by distributing two types of questionnaires (Arabic and English) to 200 students of English major at the department of linguistics and translation at the University of Tabuk, which is a government university in Saudi Arabia. Supporting data of cultural and religious influences on literacy was obtained through the researcher's own notes and observations. The purpose of the questionnaires was to investigate mainly: the students' literacy practices and frequency of using Arabic and English and the literacy infrastructure and literacy resources available to the students at their homes and at their school. The students' answers to the questionnaires indicated that most students interacted using mainly Arabic and very little English at their homes and they used some English at their school, which is related to reading their school academic books, doing homework assignments, and having rare English conversations with their classroom teachers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almusa, N. (2003). Altunaiyat fe kadaya alluga alarabiya min asr alnahda ela asr alawlama [Dual issues on Arabic from the enlightenment period to the period of globalization]. Jordan, Alshuruk Post . (in Arabic).
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second-language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
DeBaryshe, B.C., Binder, J.C., & Buell, M.J. (2000) Mothers’ implicit theories of early literacy instruction: Implications for children’s reading and writing. Early Child Development and Care, 160, 119-131.
Gardner, R.C. & Macintyre, P.D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.
Heath, S. B. (1991). A lot of talk about nothing. In B. M. Power and R. Hubbard (Eds.), The Heinemann reader: Literacy in process (pp. 79-89). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Ibrahim, R. Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peratz, J. (2002). The Characteristics of Arabic Orthography Slow its Processing. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322- 326.
Jazzar, M.R. (1991). A probe into Arab home literacy and its impact on college students’ reading ability in Arabic and English. PhD thesis. Indiana University.
Laine, E. (1977). Foreign language learning motivation in Finland I, Turku: Turku University Press.
Leichter, H. J. (1984). Families as environments for literacy. Awakening to literacy, 38, 50.
Purcell-Gates, V., & Dahl, K. L. (1991). Low-SES children's success and failure at early literacy learning in skill-based classrooms. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 1¬34-140.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shannon, J. (2003). Getting Gulf students to enjoy reading. In Perspectives. 11(1), 21-24.
Snow, C. E., Barnes, W. S., Chandler, J., Goodman, I. F., & Hemphill, L. (1991). Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Street, B. (ed.). (1990). Literacy in development: people, language, and power. London: Commonwealth Institute.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.