Linguistic Approaches to Ideology: Review of Work between 1979 and 2010

Gibreel Sadeq Alaghbary, Murad Alazzany, Ohood Al-Nakeeb


The closing year of the 1970s saw the publication of two seminal books (Fowler, Hodge, Kress, & Trew, 1979; Kress & Hodge, 1979/1993) heralding a new direction in the investigation of textual ideologies. This methodology, called Critical Linguistics (henceforth CL), was language-oriented and drew its analytical apparatus from Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. Its aim was to “explore the value systems and sets of belief which reside in texts; to explore, in other words, ideology in language” (Simpson, 1993, p. 5 [original emphasis]). Ten years later, Fairclough (1989) took CL to a new plane where linguistic analysis became one of three levels of analysis, the other two focusing on interpreting language as a response to a particular social situation, and explaining this response in the constraining context of social and institutional structures. This approach was called Critical Discourse Analysis (henceforth CDA) and its linguistic component continued to be inspired by Halliday’s model. The twenty years that followed produced a plethora of theories of CDA, divergent in their theoretical underpinnings but bound by a concern with investigating the reproduction of ideology in language. In 2010, Jeffries brought the linguistic component back to the forefront with the introduction of Critical Stylistics (henceforth CS). CS draws extensively, but not exclusively, on the linguistic components of CL and CDA. The present paper offers a critical survey of the three-decade developments (1971 through 2010) in the application of linguistic constructs and theories to the investigation of textual ideologies.



Textual ideology, critical linguistics, critical discourse analysis, critical stylistics

Full Text:



Alaghbary, G. S. (2013, July). [Review of the book Critical stylistics: The power of English, by L. Jeffries]. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(3), 137-140.

Alaghbary, G. S. (2014). The United States’ reaction to the Arab Spring: A critical stylistic analysis. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 2(1), 151–175.

Alazzany, M. (2014, October). Yemen-presidential political discourse during the revolution. In Y. Kalyango, Jr. and D. H. Mould (Ed.), Global jouranlism practice and new media performance (pp. 187-200). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (Ed.). (1998). Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2008).The language of critical discourse analysis: Reply to Michael Billig. Discourse & Society, 19, 811-819.

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–84). London: Sage.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

Fowler, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew, Language and control (pp. 185-221). London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul.

Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ideology: the return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, M. Curran, and J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture, society and the media. London: Methuen.

Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kress, G. & Hodge, R. (1979) Language as ideology (1st ed.). London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul.

Kress, G. & Hodge, R. (1993) Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul.

Kuo, S. (2003, July). Language as ideology: Analyzing quotations in Taiwanese news discourse. Paper presented at the Fifteenth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-15), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Lindstrand, F. (2008). Interview with Gunther Kress. Designs for learning, 1(1), 60-71.

McGregor, S. L. (2003). Critical discourse analysis-A primer. Critical science and critical discourse analysis, 15(1).

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. London: Routledge.

Odartey-Wellington, F. (2004). The al-Qaeda sleeper cell that never was: the Canadian news media, state security apparatus and 'Operation Thread' (Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).

Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis) representing Islam: The racism and rhetoric of British broadsheet newspapers (Vol. 9). John Benjamins Publishing.

Richardson, K. (1998). Signs and wonders: interpreting the economy through television. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Scannell, P. (1998). Media language world. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Ed.), Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.

Simpson, P. & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and power. London: Routledge.

Traynor, M. (2004). Discourse analysis. Nurse researcher, 12(2), 4-6.

Trew, T. (1979). Theory and ideology at work. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew, Language and control (pp. 94-116). London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul.

van Dijk, T. A. (1993, April). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998a). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T.A. (1998b). Towards a theory of context and experience models in discourse processing. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental models during reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, 203.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006, May). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.

Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: discourse studies - important concepts and terms. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski, Qualitative discourse analysis in the Social Sciences. Palgrave, Basingstoke.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.