A Review Study of Interlanguage Theory

Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh

Abstract


The influence of first language (L1 hereinafter)  in the learning of second language  (L2 hereinafter) has witnessed an intense debate during the past years, resulting in the prevalence of Error Analysis (EA hereinafter) over Contrastive Analysis (CA hereinafter).  A great number of empirical studies indicated that neither L1 nor L2 was always responsible for learners' errors (Bailey et al. 1974; Krashen et al. 1978, 2003; Larsen-Freeman, 2002; 2003). CA and EA paved the way for Interlanguage theory (IL hereinafter) in describing L2 learners' errors in the acquisition process of L2. IL, which has been in vogue for the last years, has witnessed huge criticism by different researchers and linguists from various L1 backgrounds. They all came to state that there are many points in this theory which are not clear. In light of this, this study aims at reviewing and discussing the role of  IL in describing and explaining learners' errors in the process of acquisition of L2. Therefore, theoretical foundations, theoretical assumptions, limitations and significance of this theory are discussed in detail. This review reveals that IL theory is almost no longer valid in the field of second language acquisition (SLA hereinafter) for numerous reasons.

 


Keywords


Interlanguage, First language, Second/foreign language, L2 errors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjemian, C. (1976). On the nature of Interlanguage systems. Language Learning, 26(2), 297-320.

Al-khresheh, M. (2010). Interlingual interference in the English language word order structure of Jordanian EFL learners. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 106-113.

Al-khresheh, M. (2011). An investigation of interlingual interference in the use of ‘and’ as a syntactic coordinating structure by Jordanian EFL learners. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 426-433.

Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there any 'natural sequence' in adult second language learning? Language Learning 21(2), 235-243.

Bent, T. & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The Interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600-1610.

Bent, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Smith, B. L. (2008). Production and perception of temporal patterns in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 65(3), 131-47.

Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Aneuaee, 68(4), 706-755.

Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and critical age hypothesis. London: LEA Publishers.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Butler-Tanaka, P. (2000). Fossilization: A chronic conditioner is consciousness-raising the cure? Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

Cheng, S. W. (2005). An exploratory cross-sectional study of Interlanguage pragmatic development of expressions of gratitude by Chinese learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa.

Cooper, T. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German. The Journal of Educational Research, 69, 176-183.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. In J.C. Richards (Eds), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 19-27). London: Longman.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining highly qualified teachers: What does scientifically-based research actually tells us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13-25.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University.

Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54(2), 227-275.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fauziati, E. (2011). Interlanguage and error fossilization: A study of Indonesian students learning English as a foreign language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 23-38.

Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J., & Watt, D. (2005). Phonological variation in child directed speech. Language 81(1), 177–206.

Frith, M. B. (1977). A study of form and function at two stages of developing Interlanguages. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Han, Z. (2005). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

Henderson, M. (1985). The Interlanguage notion. Journal of Modern Language Learning 21, 23-27.

House, J. & Kasper, G. (2000). How to remain a nonnative speaker. In C. Riemer (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 101-118). Geburtstag, Tübingen: Narr.

House, J. (2005, March). Teaching and learning English as an international lingua franca. Paper presented at the 39th TESOL Convention, San Antonio, Texas.

House, J. (2009). Introduction: The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 141-145.

Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kasper, G. & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. University of Hawaii at Manoa: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.

Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kharma, N. N. & Hajjaj, A. H., (1989). Use of the mother tongue in the ESL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 223-235.

Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The Taipei lectures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Krashen, S. D., Butler, J., Birkbaum, R., & Robertson, J. (1978). Two studies in language acquisition and language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(40), 73–92.

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. E. (2002). Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 275-285.

Larsen-Freeman, D. E. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle.

Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Edward Arnold.

Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(2), 115-123.

Nemser, W. (1974). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 55-63). London: Longman.

Othman, J. (2003). Variation in interlanguage : Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In H. Abd-Rahim & S. Manan (Eds.), Current issues in linguistics, literature and language teaching (pp.139-191). Malaysia, Penang: USM Press.

Othman, W. (2004). Subordination and coordination in English Arabic translation. Al-Basaer Journal, 8(2),1-21.

Richards, J. (1974). Analysis: Perspective on second language acquisition. In J. C. Richards (Eds.), A non-contrastive approach to error analysis (pp. 172-188). London: Longman.

Richards, J. C., Plott, J., & Platt, H. (1996). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.

Rustipa, K. (2011). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, interlanguage and the implication to language teaching. Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora, 11(1).

Selinker, L. & Lakshamanan, U. (1992). Language transfer and fossilization: The multiple effects principle. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 197-216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 219-231.

Selinker, L. (1974). Error analysis: Source, cause, and significance. In J. C. Richards (Eds.), Error analysis: Perspective on second language acquisition. London: Longman.

Sercombe, P. G. (2000). Learner language and the consideration of idiosyncrasies by students of English as a second or foreign language in the context of Brunei Darulsalam. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 58-64.

Sridhar, S. N. (1980). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage. In K. Croft (Eds.), Readings on English as a second language. Cambridge, Mass: Winthrop.

Sulaiman, K. M. (2006). An investigation of students' syntactic errors in English sentence construction at government secondary schools in Ramallah/Palestine. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sudan: Sudan University of Science and Technology.

Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.

Tarone, E. (1990). On variation in interlanguage: A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 392-400.

Tarone, E. (2001). Interlanguage. In R. Mesthrie (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics (pp. 475- 81). Oxford: Elsevier.

Yuksel, G. (2007). Grammatical errors in the compositions written by Turkish learners of English. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ataturk University: Institute of Social Sciences.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.123

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.