Form-based Approaches vs. Task-Based Approaches

Zahra Talebi, Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Sima Farhadi


This study aimed at investigating whether task-based approaches bear any superiority to that of more traditional ones evident in presentation-practice- and production phase .to fulfill the purpose of the study, the participants within the age range of 11-19, took part in the study. Following a pretest, treatment, and a posttest, the obtained data was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to examine the effects of the variables. The results of the analysis showed that participants in the PPP group did significantly better in the grammar recognition of the posttest than that of the task group. However, their counterparts in the task group gained better scores in the writing section of the test .this research study provided evidence in support of task proponents' claim in the merit of task-based activity in raising learners' implicit knowledge claiming to play the primary role in spontaneous speech.



Task-based language teaching, PPP model, focus on form, focus on meaning

Full Text:



Allwright, D. (1975). Problems in the study of the language teachers’ treatment of learner error. In M. Burt & H.Dulay (Eds.). New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education: TESOL 75 (pp. 96-109). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles. New York: Pearson Education Company.

Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 24, 245-258.

Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form- focused instruction. Language learning, 51(1), 1-46.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003).

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247.

Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10 (3), 263-295. Retrieved March 10, 2007 from

Gass, S., (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

Hatch, E. (1978). Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Kim,Y. (2004). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37(2), 254-268.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. & Terrell,T. (1983). The natural approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom.Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26, 175-182.

Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Language. London: Academic Press.

Littlewood, w. (2004). The task based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT journal, 58(4).

Littlewood, W. (2007) Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243249.

Long, M., (1983). Native speaker/ non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.

Long, M. (1991). “Focus on Form: A design feature in language teaching Methodology”. In Ginsberg, K. & Kramsch, C. (Eds), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective (pp.39-52).

Long, M. (1996). “The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition”. Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.

Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: a response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81, 318-323.

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research, process. In C. Doughty & J. Williams

(Eds.): Focus on form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. (pp.15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayo, G. (2002). The effectiveness of two form focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 156-175.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task based language teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).

Pica, T. (1994). Questions from the language classroom: research perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 49-79.

Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Storch, N. (2001). An investigation into the nature of pair work in an ESL classroom and its effect on grammatical development Unpublished doctoral dissertation: the University of Melbourne.

Vilches, C. L. M. (2003). Task based language teaching: The case of EN 10. RELC, 34 (1), 82-99.

White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: the input

Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2007) .Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Harlow: Longman.

Willis, J. (1998). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman: de Henseler Books.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.