The Effect of Two Types of Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing Skill

Sina Soltanabadi Farshi, Saeedeh Khalili Safa

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two types of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing skill. Thirty five advanced learners in three groups participated in this study. Structures of written texts were taught in all three classes during fourteen sessions of treatment; and each session, a related topic was given and the learners were asked to write about it. In class A, the learners had to deliver their assignments to the teacher in classroom; then the teacher wrote the corrective notes on their papers and gave their papers back the next session. In class B, students had to write their assignments on their electronic instruments, and after that send written tasks via email to the teacher, and he also sent the corrective comments on their errors through email. In class C, as control group, no corrective feedback was given to learners’ errors in their written tasks. Moreover, in class C, learners were free to deliver their writings whether in class or by email. The obtained results showed both methods to be effective since the scores of both experimental groups were significantly higher than the scores of control group, but electronic feedback was more effective and profitable than traditional type; because scores of the learners in group B (Electronic feedback) were significantly higher than class C (Traditional feedback).

Keywords: writing skill, corrective feedback, electronic feedback, traditional feedback


Full Text:

PDF

References


Colson, J. (2011). Anne Sexton's "The Little Peasant". The Explicator 69 (3): 133-136.

Dalfonzo, Gina, (2013). Frozen's Cynical Twist on Prince Charming. The Atlantic (20 February, 2014). Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/12/-em-frozen-em-s-cynical-twist-on-prince-charming/282204/

DeVito, J. (2011). The Transformations of Anne Sexton, Poststructuralist Witch, The Essay Exchange at I love Literature. iloveliterature.com, 25 August 2011. Web [20 March 2014], http://www.iloveliterature.com/anne_sexton_essay.html

Fukuda, Sh. (2008). The Hesitancy of "middle-aged witch": Anne Sexton's Transformation. Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos, no. 13, pp. 31 - 47.

Gill, J. (2006). Modern Confessional Writing: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge.

Gill, J. (2004). Textual Confessions: Narcissism in Anne Sexton's Early Poetry. Twentieth Century Literature 50 (1): 59-87.

Harris, E.W. (2001). New Frames of Old Tales. Twice Upon a Time: Women Writers and the History of Fairy Tales. New Jersey: Princeton University Press: 121-134.

Johnson, G. (1984). The Achievement of Anne Sexton. Hollins Critic 21 (3): +1

Joyce, C.M. (2009). Contemporary Women Poets and the Fairy Tales. Susan Redington Bobby (ed.), Fairy Tales Re-imagined: Essays on New Retellings. North Carolina: McFarland: 31-43.

Kimmelman, B. (2005). Companion to 20th Century American Poetry. New York: Facts on File Inc.

Kumin, M. (1981). How It Was: Maxine Kumin on Anne Sexton. The Complete Poems: Anne Sexton: xix-xxxiv.

Mathew, R. (2011). Re-Vision as Art and Medium: A Study of Re-Visionist Mythmaking in Feminist English Poetry. Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, PhD thesis.

McGowan, P. (2004). Anne Sexton and Middle Generation Poetry: the Geography of Grief. Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing.

Middlebrook, D.W. (1996). Telling Secrets. The Seduction of Biography, by Mary Rhiel and David Suchoff (eds.). New York: Routledge: 123-129.

Ostriker, A. (1982a). That Story: Anne Sexton and Her Transformation. American Poetry Review, July/Agust: 11-16.

________, (1982b). Thieves of Language: Women Poets and Revisionist Mythmaking. Signs 8 (1): 68-90.

Sage, L. (ed.), (1999). The Cambridge Guide to Women's Writing in English. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sexton, A. (1981). The Complete Poems: Anne Sexton. Boston: Houton.

Vendler, H.(1988). The Music of What Happens: Poems, Poets, Critics. Boston: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.