In Search for New Translational Norms: Textual Additions in Parentheses as Devices of Textuality

Mohammad Amin Hawamdeh

Abstract


This study aims at exploring new norms as to the textual additions in parentheses (=TAiPs) in the translation of a Quranic text as writer-oriented devices of textuality. Coding for this sort of information could be useful in establishing an impact on any decision-making process on the TL version; such TAiPs can give a translated text of the Quran unity and purpose and distinguish it from a disconnected sequence of sentences. Six small-sized chapters of the Quran were selected as a research sample including a number of four handred forty two (442) TAiPs. Two writer-oriented kinds of textuality were found: cohesivity at the levels of grammar and lexis to be in form of recurrence, reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction; and relationality by coherence and intentionality to be in form of reiteration, collocation, connotation, evocation and interpretation. The study is a detailed analysis of such a severely criticized yet officially approved English interpretation of the Quran as the Hilali and Khan Translation (=HKT) against a predetermined set of text-linguistic norms. The strength or weakness of TAiPs as to how they might alleviate or aggravate the TL version is eventually identified for sake of improvement.

Keywords


Textual Addition in Parentheses (Taip), Cohesivity and Relationality, Translation, The Quran, Hilali and Khan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, M. (2011). In Other Words: A Course-book on Translation. London and New York: Routledge.

Beaugrande, R., & Dressler W. (1981/1992). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London, New York: Longman.

Blomm, I., & Bary, W. (1990) Approaches to the Asian Classics. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hawamdeh, M. A. (2015). Parenthetical Cohesive Explicitness: A Linguistic Approach for a Modified Translation of the Quranic Text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 161-169.

Hilali, M. T., & Khan, M. M. (1996). The Noble Qur'an: English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary. Madinah, Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Complex for Printing of the Holy Qur'an.

Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Wild, S. (2006). An Arabic Recitation: The Meta-linguistics of Quranic Revelation. In Stefan Wild (Ed.) Self-Referentiality in the Quran, 135-157.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2018 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.