Rhetorical Moves in Problem Statement Section of Iranian EFL Postgraduate Students' Theses

Vahid Nimehchisalem, Zahra Tarvirdizadeh, Sara Sayed Paidary, Nur Izyan Syamimi Binti Mat Hussin

Abstract


The Problem Statement (PS) section of a thesis, usually a subsection of the first chapter, is supposed to justify the objectives of the study. Postgraduate students are often ignorant of the rhetorical moves that they are expected to make in their PS. This descriptive study aimed to explore the rhetorical moves of the PS in Iranian master’s (MA) degree theses. The study focused on 30 PSs written by MA Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) students. The samples were analyzed based on Swales’ (1990) Create-a-research-space (CARS) model. The findings revealed the students’ flaws in writing the PS where they typically presented the significance of their study. The results of the analysis of their written samples also showed that some of the students failed to address a problem as an academic issue based on the existing gap in the previous studies and failed to recommend ways to solve the problem. Students’ awareness of the rhetorical structure of the PS may help them create higher-quality works in academic settings. This study has theoretical and pedagogical implications, a discussion of which concludes the paper.

Keywords: Genre, Rhetorical structure, Problem Statement, Swales CARS model, MA theses, EFL learners


Full Text:

PDF

References


Cheung, Y. L. (2012). Understanding the Writing of Thesis Introductions: An Exploratory Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 744–749. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.191

Connor, U. M. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge Applied Linguistics.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Harklau, L. (2002). The Role of Writing in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329-350.

Hernon &Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993). Problem Statements: An Exploratory of Their Function, Significance and Form. Library & Information ScienceResearch, 15, 71-92

Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2007). What is a problem statement? Library and Information Science Research, 29(3), 307–309. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.06.001

Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 240–250.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001

Ibrahim, N., & Nambiar, R. M. (2011). What is the problem with the statement of problem? : the case of postgraduate international students and the introductory sections of a project paper. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1713–1717.

Jalilifar, A., Firuzmand, S., & Roshani, S. (2011). Genre analysis of problem statement sections of MA proposals and theses in Applied Linguistics. Language, Society and Culture, (33), 85–93. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Genre+Analysis+of+Problem+Statement+Sections+of+MA+Proposals+and+Theses+in+Applied+Linguistics#1

Kaplan, R. B. 1966. Cultural Thought Patterns in Intercultural Education. Language Learning. 16, 1-20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x

Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6(1), 81–91.

Khodabandeh, F. (2014). Argumentation across L1 and L2: Examination of Three Instructional Treatments of Genre-based Approach to Teaching Instructional Treatments of Genre-based Approach to Teaching. Elsevier, 968 – 975.doi:10.1080/17437270802417176

Lilian, B. L. (2004). Toulmin's Model of Argument and the Question of Relativism. In L. Bermejo-Luque, Rhetorical criteria for argument evaluation? (pp. 169-181). Murcia: University of Murcia.

Loi , C. K., & Evans , M. S. (2010)). Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 2814–2825.

Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s Model in the Writing Classroom: A Case Study. Written Communication.

Metoyer-Duran, C., & Hernon, P. (1994). Problem Statements in Research Proposals And Published Research: A Case Study of Researchers’ Viewpoints. Library & Information Science Research, 16(2), 105–118. doi:10.1016/0740-8188(94)90003-5

Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a Quantitative Research Thesis. International J. Educ. Sci.1 (1):19-32. Retrieved onlineat:http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/IJES/IJES-01-0-000-09-Web/IJES-01-1-000-09-Abst-P[Accessed on 20/10/11].

Stansbury, M. C. (2002). Problem statements in seven LIS journals: An application of the Hernon/Metoyer-Duran attributes. Library and Information Science Research, 24(2), 157–168. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00110-X

Samraj, B. (2008). A Discourse Analysis of Master's Theses across Disciplines with a Focus on Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55–67

Swales, M. J. (1990). Genre Analysis: Enlish in academic and research settings.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated edition 2003). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.2307/2183556

Williams, J. ( 2005). Teaching Writing In Second And Foreign Language Classrooms. McGraw-Hill.

Zhu, W. (2001). Performing Argumentative Writing in English: Difficulties, process, and strategies. TESL Canada Journal, 34-50.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.