Text me! Interpersonal Discourse Analysis of Egyptian Mobile Operators’ SMSs

Mai Samir El-Falaky


The present study examines the discourse of a number of Short Messaging Service (SMS). The selected data is analyzed according to the lexico-grammatical choices reflected in the interpersonal metafunction. Results are, then, interpreted for the purpose of deciding how service providers use language to convince a large number of customers of their digital products. Such accomplishment is conditioned by how much they succeed in persuading their audience that they are capable of providing them useful products and how these products, in turn, meet their communicative demands. The study assure that the selection of the lexico-grammatical tools is crucial in enabling senders to perform a number of functions such as constructing social relations, exercising power or maintaining solidarity with the receivers.

Keywords: service provider, mood, pronouns, tense, discourse, lexico-grammatical 

Full Text:



Biber, D. and Conrand, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style.UK: Cambridge University Press.

Butler, C. (2003). Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural- Functional Theories. USA: John Benjamin's Publishing.

Cronin, A. (2007). Computer-Mediated Communication and Negotiation: Effects of media and Power on Relationship Development (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest (3277486).

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum Publishing International.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. USA: Longman.

______. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.

USA: Longman.

______. (1996). Technologisation of Discourse. In Carmen Rosa and Malcolm Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices. (pp. 71-83). London: Roultedge.

______. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

______. (2005). Peripheral Vision: Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26 (1), 915-939.

Fairclough , N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Teun van Dijk. (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. (pp. 258-283). London: Sage Publication.

Fowler, R. and Kress, G. (1979). Critical Linguistics. In R. Fowler, B.Hodge, et al (Eds.). Language and Control. (pp.185-213). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Frehner, C. (2008). Email, SMS, MMS: The Linguistic Creativity of Asynchronous Discourse in the New Media Age. UK: Die Deutche Bibliothek

Haig, M. (2002). Mobile Marketing: The Message Revolution. UK: Biddles.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1982). The De-automatization of Grammar. In J. Anderson, Ed., Language Form and Linguistic Variation, (pp.129-159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. USA:Oxford University Press.

Halliday, MAK. & Hasan, Ruqaya. (1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. London: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, M.I.M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. USA: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K & Teubert, Wolf. (Eds). (2004) Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics. USA: Continuum International Publishing.

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse Analysis. USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Herring, S. et.al. (2013). Introduction to the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. In Susan Herring et.al (Eds). Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. (pp.3-32). Germany: Walter du Gruyter

Herring, S. (2013). Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar Reconfigured and Emergent. In Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester (Eds.). Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. (pp. 1-26). USA:Georgetown University.

Howarth, D. and Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. In David Howarth and Yannis Stavrakakis et al. (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. (pp. 1-23). USA: Manchester University Press.

Humphreys, L. (2007). Mobile Sociality and Spatial Practice:a Qualitative Field Study of New social Networking Technologies (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProquestUMI. (3271770)

Ling, R. (2004). The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone's Impact on Society. USA: Morgan Kaufmann publishers.

Ling, L. (Eds) (2014). Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis.USA: IGI Global

Moore, L. and Craig. E. (2010). Relationship Development and Maintenance in a Mediated World. In Jung-ran Park (Ed.) Interpersonal Relations and Social Patterns in Communication. (pp. 77-99).USA: IGI Global 2010.

Moore, J. D., & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2003). 12 Discourse in Computational Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence. In Handbook of Discourse Processes, Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.) (pp. 439-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moutaouakil, A. (1989). Pragmatic Functions in a Functional Grammar of Arabic. Holland: Foris Publications.

Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80–97

Riddle, E. (1978). Sequence of Tenses in English. USA: University of Illinois Press

Rodney, J. (2012). Discourse, Creativity and Technology. In Jones Rodney (Ed.). Discourse and Creativity. (pp.165-189).USA: Routledge.

Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). On the Emergence of Green Ideology: The Dislocation Factor in Green Politics. In David Howarth and Yannis Stavrakakis et al. (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. (pp. 100-118). USA: Manchester University Press.

Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse.USA: Routledge.

Segerstad, Y. (2006). Language in SMS-a Soci-linguistic View. In R. Harper and L. Palen, A. Taylor (Eds.). The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. (pp.33-53). USA: Springer.

Sieloff Magnan, S (Ed). (2008). Mediating Discourse Online. USA: John Benjamin Publishing Company

Spilioti, T. (2011). Beyond Genre: Closings and relational work in text messaging. In Crispin Thurlow (Ed.). Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. (pp.67-128). USA: Oxford University Press.

Steiner, E. (1991). A Functional Perspective on Language, Action, and Interpretation: An Initial Approach with a View to Computational Modeling. USA: Mouton de Gruyter.

Tag, C. (2012). Discourse of Text Messaging: Analysis of SMS Communication.UK: Continuum publishing.

Teich, E. (1999). Systemic Functional Grammar in Natural Langugae Generation: Linguistic Description and Computational Representation. London: Continuum Publishing Company.

Thompson, G. (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Oxford University Press.

van Dijk , T. (1996). Discourse, Power and Access. In Carmen Rosa and Malcolm Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices. (pp. 84-103). London: Roultedge.

______. (1997a). The Study of Discourse. In Teun van Dijk. (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 1. (pp. 1-34). London: Sage Publication.

______. (1997b) Discourse as Interaction in Society. In (Teun A. van Dijk Ed.), Discourse as Social Interation. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. London: Sage Publications.

______. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.______. (2002) Multidisciplinary CDA: a Plea for Diversity. In Ruth Wodak (Ed.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 95-119). London: Sage Publications.

Ward, M. (2004). We have the Power - Or do We: Pronouns of Power in a Union Context. In Lynne and Young and Claire Harrison. (Eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change. (pp. 281-295). NewYork: Continuum.

Wodak, R. (2002). What CDA is about: A Summary of its History,Important Concepts and its Developments. In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (Eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 1-12). London: Sage Publications.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.