Morphophonology of Mengrelian Preverbal Markers and Structure of PF

Leila Lomashvili

Abstract


The paper examines the preverbal markers in Mengrelian as the possible loci of post-syntactic phonological rules that affect the allomorphy of these preverbs. The goal of the paper is to pinpoint the series of these rules and the extent to which the final form of the derived material changes as a result of their application. The phonological rules are examined in light of cyclic and post-cyclic processes that have different local domains of application such as nested constituents for the former and entire words for the latter (Halle & Nevins, 2009). It is shown that that phonological rules may obscure the derivation of surface forms from underlying representations and that the meaning of preverbal markers may not be kept as a result of  these changes. The paper concludes that the derivational view of morphology such as Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz, 1993) should be modified to accommodate these data.

Keywords: cyclic, post-cyclic, phonological rule, preverb, PF 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aronson, H. (1990). Georgian: A reader’s grammar. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.

Arregi, C. & Nevins, A. (2012). Structure of Spellout. Morphotactics of Basque Auxiliaries. Dordrecht: Springer.

Bacovič, E. (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalizations. Phonology, 24, 214-259.

Danelia, K. (1991). The issues in the lexicology of the Mengrelian-Chan language. Georgian Folklore, Mengrelian texts. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). Sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Gussenhoven, C. & Jacobs, H. (2011). Understanding phonology. Third edition. London, UK: Hodder Education.

Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and pieces of inflection. In View from building, 20, 111-176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Halle, M. & Mohanan, K.P. (1985). Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 57-116.

Halle, M. & Matushansky, O. (2006). The morpho-phonology of Russian adjectival inflection. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 351-404.

Halle, M. & Nevins, A. (2009). Rule application in phonology. In E. Raimy & Ch. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, 355-383. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press & London, UK: Bradford Books.

Kajaia, O. (2001). Megrul-Kartuli leksikoni. [Mengrelian-Georgian dictionary]. V.1, Tbilisi, Georgia: Nekeri.

Kenstowicz, M., and Kisseberth, Ch. (1979).Generative phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.

Kenstovicz, M. (1994a). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kiparsky, P. (1982). Word formation and the Lexicon. In F. Igemann, (ed.), Mid-American Linguistics conference papers, 3-29. Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Verkuyl, H. (1989). Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 39-94.

Xubua, M. (1942). The assertive particle k’o- in Mengrelian, The Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia: Metsniereba [Academic Press].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.