Evaluating ELT Textbook in Bangladesh: The Case of English for Today (Classes Nine-Ten)

Muhammed Rukan Uddin


The paper evaluates the ELT textbook English for Today (Classes Nine–Ten) which is used as a dominant instructional material in secondary level schools and madrasahs in Bangladesh. The National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB) of Bangladesh published the revised edition of the textbook series English for Today in the academic year 2013 incorporating the guidelines proposed in National Education Policy (NEP, 2010) and National Curriculum (NC, 2012). Ever since the introduction of the ELT textbook series, systematic evaluations to examine their pedagogical usefulness and constraints have been found inadequate. The purpose of the study is, therefore, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the textbook which will help the teachers do maximum application of its strengths in the classroom, and make sensible decisions about the weaknesses. This study followed the ‘whilst-use’ evaluation type, and adopted mainly the checklist method. The checklist was designed drawing on suitable criteria from the popular checklist developed by McDonough, Shaw and Masuhara (2013). In addition, a short semi-structured interview was conducted with 10 secondary English teachers in order to explore how the teachers would perceive and evaluate the textbook. Though the evaluation identified the textbook’s rewarding features, it also revealed a number of limitations which require sincere attention of the curriculum and materials developers. The study implies that the textbook requires both internal and external improvements in order to maximize the learning outcomes and meet the curriculum objectives. The paper also makes recommendations for the curriculum experts and textbook writers for consideration during future editions of the textbook.


English for Today (EfT), The Checklist Method, External and Internal Criteria, National Curriculum and Textbook Board (NCTB), National Education Policy (NEP), National Curriculum (NC), Textbook Evaluation

Full Text:



Collins English dictionary. (1994). Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.

Council of Europe. (2009): Manual for language test development and examining. language policy division. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/ dg4/linguistic/

English for Today (Classes IX-X). (2013). Dhaka: National Curriculum and Textbook Board.

Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hutchinson, T &Torres, E. (1994). ‘The textbook as agent of change’, ELT Journal 48.4:315-28

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Karim, A, & Rashid, A. (2019). Examining the Impact of English in Action Training Program on Secondary-School English Teachers’ Classroom Practice in Bangladesh. The Qualitative Report. 24 (3), 2: 441-469

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher's guide (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ministry of Education (MoE). (2010). National education policy. Dhaka.

National Curriculum & Textbook Board (NCTB). (2012). National Curriculum. Dhaka: Ministry of Education.

Uddin, M.R. (2020). In-Service Training for Secondary English Teachers of Bangladeshi Madrasahs: Investigating Adequacy and Effectiveness. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v 10i1.36-45

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.1.p.84


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.