Interpreting and Markers in Nigerian Courtroom Discourse

Farinde Raifu Olanrewaju, Oyedokun Alli, Wasiu Ademola

Abstract


It has already been affirmed that power and control embedded in questions varies according to question type (Luchjenbroers 1999, Rigney 1999 etc). The paper ranges question types according to their degree of control and observes that those with high degree of control lost their power and control through the process of interpreting. It is further observed that since lawyers always maintain power and control through the type of questions they ask (such as declarative, yes/no, alternative questions) they are at the losing end whenever there is the need for court interpreter. Similarly, the use of discourse markers in the court (such as now, so, and, ok), also signifies lawyer’s power and control over the witnesses and defendants and these are always used to further enhance the power, coercion and challenging nature of the lawyers (see Hale 1999). The study further notes that the power and control of questions coating discourse markers are always reducing through the process of interpreting. The paper opines that the presence of courtroom interpreters in court reduces the power and control of lawyers in court.

Keywords


Questions, Power, Discourse Markers, Control, Interpreter, Lawyers, Declarative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adebowale, I. (2010) A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Language of Police Interrogation in Nigeria: A Case Study of Sango Police Station in Ibadan. B.A Project in the Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Ibadan.

Ajayi, T. (2016). (Im)Politeness Strategies and Power Abuse in Police-Suspect Interaction in Ibadan, Nigeria. An unpublished PhD Thesis in the Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.

Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). The Bilingual Courtroom Court Interpreters in The Judicial Proces.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Berk-Seligson, S. (1999). The Impact of Court Interpreting on the Coerciveness of Leading Questions. Forensic Linguistics 6(1):30-56.

Crystal, D. (1994). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Farinde, R. & Ojo, J. 2005.Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Ibadan: Lektay Publishers.

Farinde, R.O. (1997) A Linguistic Study of Police/Accused Discourse: An Unpublished Thesis in the Department of English, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Farinde, R.O. (2011) Questioning in Nigerian Police-Suspect Discourse. A Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria at Bayero University, Kano.

Hale, S. (1999). Interpreters Treatment of Discourse Markers in Courtroom Questions. Forensic Linguistics.

Moeketsi, R. (1999). Discourse in a Multilingual and Multicultural Courtroom A Court Interpreter’s Guide. Pretoria: J.L Van Schaik Publishers

Ogunsiji, A. (1989) The language of the Police in Ila Local Government Area of Oyo State: A Discourse Analysis Approach. An MA Project in the Department of English, University of Ibadan.

Oyebade, T. A. (2007) The Pragmatics of English Usage in Police Communication in Ibadan Metropolis. Unpublished MA English Thesis, University of Ibadan.

Rigney, A. (1999). Questioning in Interpreted Testimony. Forensic Linguistics 6(1) 83-108.

Sadiq, M.T. (2011) A Discourse Analysis of the Language of Interrogation in Police/Criminal Investigations in Kano Metropolis. An MA ThesisSubmitted to the Department of English and Literary Studies, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Taylor, C. (2004). Court Licensed Abuse, Patriarchal Lore and the Legal Response to Intra-familial Sexual Abuse of Children. New York: Peter Lang.

Terebo, O.Y. (2012) The Role of Police Interpreters in Interrogation Exercise: A Case Study of Iyaganku Police Station, Ibadan. Unpublished MA Project in the Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Ibadan.

Woodbury, H. (1984). The Strategic Use of Questions in Court. Semiotica 48,197-228.

Zajac, R. & Cannan, P. ((2009)). ‘Cross-examination of Sexual Assault Complainants: A Developmental Comparison’16 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 36.

Zajac, R. & Hayne, H. ((2006). ‘The Negative Effect of Cross-examination Style Questioning on Children’s Accuracy: Older Children are not Immune’ 20 Applied Cognitive Psychology.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.3p.24

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.