Exploring Language Learning Strategies of Saudi EFL learners at Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia

Bilal Ayed Al-Khaza’le

Abstract


Among the effective learning tools that enhance the L2 learning process, learning strategies are considered the most vital and essential techniques could be used by the learners for improving their L2 achievement. The current study explored the preferred language learning strategies for group of Saudi EFL learners in Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia. The sample of the study included 60 male undergraduate students enrolled in English department in 2019 academic session. The sample responded to the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) questionnaire by Oxford. Results were analyzed using SPSS program. Findings showed that the sample used almost all strategies in an average level. The findings showed that social strategy was used most frequently by this group of students followed by metacogntive strategy. Both strategy categories used with high range according to Oxford scale. While the rest of the strategies fell in the average range, compensation, cognitive, affective, except for the memory strategy which was used with low range. Based on the findings of the study, it is implied that training programs are suggested in this case to explain to the students the importance of using all LLSs as much as possible without focusing on one particular strategies and neglecting the others.

Keywords


Language Learning Strategies, L2 Learning Process, Strategy Inventory For Language Learning, Saudi Efl Learners, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afshar, H. S., Tofighi, S., & Hamazavi, R. (2016). Iranian EFL learners' emotional intelligence, learning styles, strategy use, and their L2 achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 26(4), 635.

Alharbi, A. (2017). The Social language strategies of Saudi students in an English as a second language context.

Alkahtani, S. S. (2016). Language Learning Strategies Among Saudi Efl College Students And Their Relationship To Students’perceptual Learning Style, Gender, Academic Major And Proficiency Level.

Al-Seghayer, K. (2005). Teaching English in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Slowly but steadily changing. Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice, 125-134. Annals, 22(1): 13-24.

Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65, 24-35.

Bremner, S. (1998). LLSs and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 1(2), 491-514.

Brown, A. L. (2001). Developing language and literacy. Second edition. Paul Chapman Publishing: Prentice Hall.

Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Chamot, A. U. (1993). Students’ responses to learning strategy instruction in the

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in LLSs research and teaching.

Chamot, A. U., O'Malley, J. M., Küpper, L. & Impink-Hernandez. (1987). A study of foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 26 (3): 308-314.

Cohen, A.D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: Clarifying the issues University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: A revised version of a paper originally prepared for presentation at the Symposium on Strategies of Language Learning and Use, Seville, Spain, December 13-16.

Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The modern language journal, 92(2), 232-249.

Griffiths, C. & Parr, J. M. (1999). Language-learning strategies: theory and perception. ELT Journal 3: 247-254.

Griffiths, C. (Ed.). (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge University Press.

Harris, V. & Grenfell, M. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies. In theory and practice. London : Routledge.

Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and social psychology review, 10(2), 88-110.

Hismanoglu, M., & Hismanoglu, S. (2011). Task-based language teaching: what every EFL teacher should do. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 46-52.

Khan, I. A. (2011). Learning difficulties in English: Diagnosis and pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Educational Research, 2(7), 1248-1257.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned 4th edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford university press.

McMullen, M. G. 2009. Using LLSs to improve the writing skills of Saudi EFL students: Will it really work? System 37 (3): 418- 433.

Miller, G., & Pilcher, C. L. (2002). Can selected learning strategies influence the success of adult distance learners in agriculture?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(2), 34-43.

Miller, J. (2002). Examining the interplay between constructivism and different learning styles. Retrieved July 18, 2007 from

O’Malley, J. M & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stwener-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L. & Russo, R. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3): 557-584.

O'malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press.

Oxford, R. L. & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventor for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 31-39.

Oxford, R. L & Ehrman, M. E & Leaver, B. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 23 1-23.

Oxford, R. L. & Ehrman, M.E.(1995). Adults’ learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System 23: 359-386.

Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of LLSs: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System 17 (2): 235-247.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). LLSs: what every teacher should know New York: Newbury House Harper Collins.

Oxford, R. L. (1992). LLSs: critical issues in concept and definition. Applied Language Learning 3 (1-2): 1-35.

Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research in second LLSs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7(1-2): 25-45.

Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73 (3):

Politzer, R.L. & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gain in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103-123.

Proceedings of 103rd The IRES International Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 16th-17th February, 2018

Rabab'ah, G., & Bulut, D. (2007). Compensatory strategies in Arabic as a second language. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 43(2), 83-106.

Rigney, J.W. (1978). Learning strategies: a theoretical perspective. In O’Neil Jr. H.F. Learning Strategies, 165-205.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209-230.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the" good language learner" can teach us. TESOL quarterly, 41-51.

Sheorey, R. (1999). Learning strategies of an Indian College students. Proceeding of the invited research symposium on LLSs,73-75. Teachers College, Colombia University, New York.

Shmais, W. 2003. Language learning strategy use in Palestine. TESL Journal, 7(2), 1-17.

Stern, H. H. 1992. Issues and options in language teaching (edited posthumously by Patrick Allen & Birgit Harley). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stern, H. (1975) .What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318.

Thompson, A., Simonsen, M., and Hargrave, C. (1996). Educational Technology A Review of the Research. Association for Educational Communications and Technology: Washington

Vidal, R. T. (2002). Is there a correlation between reported language learning strategy use, actual strategy use and achievement? Linguagem & Ensino

Virkkula, E., & Nissilä, S. P. (2017). Towards professionalism in music: self-assessed learning strategies of conservatory music students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 113-135.

Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: an expanded view of the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language learning, 37, 573-597.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.4p.63

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.