Developing ESP Reading Materials for Accounting Students

Farnia Sari, Yunani Atmanegara


Exposing abundance of English information related to students’ educational background knowledge can improve their competence in comprehending English texts. Thus, this study developed ESP reading materials for accounting students. It was aimed at finding out what kind of ESP reading materials should be developed to increase accounting students’ reading skill, and examining the validity, practicality, and potential effect of the developed ESP reading materials.The product was developed by using Akker covering the phases of analysis, design, evaluation and revision. Furthermore, formative evaluation proposed by Tessmer was used. This study involved 40 students selected by using purposive technique. The data were gathered from the results of validation sheet questionnaire of content and instructional design, students’ responses questionnaire, and reading comprehension test. The analysis of validation sheet questionnaire from two experts’ judgement indicated that the developed product had very high validity (3.61). Meanwhile, the results of students’ responses questionnaire showed that the average score in one-to-one evaluation was 3.3 and in small group evaluation was 3.5. It revealed that the product was denoted as practical in which both evaluations were in high practicality category. At last, the results of reading comprehension test showed that there was 64% of the students could pass the minimum mastery criterion. Thus, the findings indicated that ESP reading materials for accounting students can be determined had average potential effect after being implemented to the students in a real class. In other words, ESP reading materials developed in this study were potential effect enough to increase the students’ reading skill.


Research Development, Material Development, ESP, Reading Materials, Accounting

Full Text:



Akker, J. (1999). Principle and methods of development research. In J. Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustalfon, T. Nieveen N, &Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and development research (pp. 1-14). London: Kluwer.

Alfaki, I. M. & Siddiek, A. G. (2013). The role of background knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension. World Journal of English Language, 3(4). 42-66.

Baron, M. J. B. (2013). Building ESP content-based materials to promote strategic reading. Profile, 15(1), 139-169.

Bachir, K., & Alaziz, G.M. A. (2016). Designing ESP course:Setting objectives for business learners. Unpublished Dissertation. Faculty of Letters and Languages, Ouargla University.

Basturkman, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chenyiic,Y. C. (2010). Content based business English course for EFL. The International TESL Journal, 16(1). Retrieved from http//

Chia, H.L. (2001). Reading activities for effective top-down processing. Forum, 39 (1), 5-10

Crookes,G.,& Schmidt, R.W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning,41(4), 469-512

Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M.J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multidisiplinar approach.Cambridge, UK: CUP.

Gardner, D., & Miller, L. (1999). Establishing self-access: From theory to practice. Pearson: Longman.

Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to instructional development: Process and techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Goodman, K. S., & Niles, O. S. (1980). Reading process and program. Illinois: Commission on the English Curriculum National Council of Teachers of English.

Harding, K.., & Maly, A.(2007). English for specific purposes.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hutchinson, Tom, & Waters, Alan. (1989). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge university press: Great Britain

Jennings, J. (2001) Jennings informal reading assessment. Retrieved from

Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2003). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Loon Wiley & Sons, I Dc.

Madsen, H.S.,& Bowen, J.D. (1978). Adaptation in language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

Marand, E. S. (2011). Adoption, adaptation, and development of language instructional units. European Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 550-555.

Maroko, G.M. (2013). Development of language materials for national development: A language management perspective. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(7), 1-14

McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012).Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.

Mitra, N. K., Nagaraja, H. S., Ponnudurai, G., & Judson, J. P. (2009). The levels of difficulty and discrimination indices in type A multiple choice questions of pre-clinical semester 1 multidisciplinary summative tests. International EJournal of Science, Medicine and Education, 3(1), 2–7. Retrieved from:

Richards, J. (2005). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richey, R.C., Klein, J., & Nelson, W. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communication and Technology (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practioners guide. New York: Prentice Hall, CUP.

Sunggiwati, D & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2013). Teachers’ questioning in reading lessons: A case study in Indonesia. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10 (1), 80–89.

Stark Jr. M. W. (1981). An instrument for the assessment of ESL students' a group informal reading inventory: Reading performance (Published doctor’s dissertation). Oregon State University, United States of America.

Tarigan, H.G. (1990). Membaca sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tessmer, M.(1993).Planning and conducting formative evaluation. Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.

The Bylaws and Policies of the Miami-Dade Country Public Schools. (2015). Instructional materials and resources. Retrieved from

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching. 42 (2), 143-179

Waugh, C. K., & Gronlund., N.E. (2013). Assessment of students achievement (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Yazdanmehr, E.& Shoghi, S. (2014). Design and Application of a textbook visual effects’ evaluation checklist. Theory and Practice in Language studies, 4(3), 473-480



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.