An Analysis of English Language Theories: A Case Study

Ali Ata Alkhaldi, Tamara Oshchepkova

Abstract


Language is implicated in daily lives, and there are a large and open-ended number of activities (Cook, 2003), which involve language theories (Alkhaldi, 2011). This research analyses the language theories which are involved in the activities of Jordanian language materials. The researchers have chosen a sample from language materials used to teach English at Jordanian public high schools since 2015. An analysis checklist has been adapted and used, focusing on the analysis of language theories. The findings show that the students’ role is responsive rather than proactive. The dominant source of content is the materials, and the teachers’ role is overlooked in providing useful language content. Furthermore, the mental operations have not been taken to the deepest level to promote students’ creative and critical thinking skills. The findings also reveal that the materials have a sentence-based content, that is, the content provided as input to learners and content expected as output from the learners comprise individual words, phrases and sentences, and there are few opportunities for extended written and oral discourse. Consequently, it is recommended that teachers, researchers and materials developers should take into consideration such challenging findings to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to develop language materials effectively. In other words, the materials should continuously be analysed, evaluated, and developed in a systematic and rigorous way to have insights into the materials and the process of analysis for professional development purposes, and to help students improve their language learning process.

Keywords


Materials Analysis, Language Theories, Materials Development, Professional Development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alkhaldi, A. A. (2010). Developing a principled framework for materials evaluation: Some considerations. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 1(2), 281-298. doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.1n.2p.281

Alkhaldi, A. A. (2011). Materials Development in Jordan: An Applied Linguistics Challenge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Basturkman, H. (1999). A Content analysis of ELT textbook blurbs: Reflections of theory-in-use. RELC Journal, 30(1) pp.18-38.

Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Dat, B. (2006). Developing EFL materials for local markets: Issues and considerations. In: Mukundan, J. ed. Focus on ELT Materials (pp. 52-76). Petaling Jaya: Pearson Malaysia.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Littlejohn, A. (1992). Why are English language teaching materials the way they are? Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.

Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In: Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed., pp.179-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher's guide. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Mukundan, J. (2006). Are three new ways of evaluating ELT textbooks? In: Mukundan, J. ed. Readings on ELT materials II (pp.170-180). Petaling Jaya: Pearson Malaysia.

Mukundan, J. (2009). ESL Textbook Evaluation: A Composite Framework. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG.

Pelteret, Ch., Kilbey, L., and Greet, J. (2015a). Action Pack Twelfth Grade, Student’s Book. England: Pearson Education Ltd.

Pelteret, Ch., Kilbey, L., and Greet, J. (2015b). Action Pack Twelfth Grade, Teacher’s Book. England: Pearson Education Ltd.

Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (1999). Developing criteria for evaluating L2 materials. IATEFL Issues, 147, pp.10-13.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed). (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wala, D. A. S. (2003). A coursebook is what it is because of what it has to do: an editor’s perspective. In: Tomlinson, B. ed. Materials development for language teaching (pp. 58-71). London, Continuum Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.227

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.