Exploring the Reasons for the Fossilization of Phonological Errors: A case study of the substitution of/o/for/ɔ/by English as Second Language Learners in Sri Lanka

Kaushika Premarathne

Abstract


Over the past decades, various teaching methods adopted from time to time have placed pronunciation teaching in the forefront or in the backend. This has resulted in second language facilitators to completely disregard or relentlessly correct pronunciation depending on their intuition due to the lack of research on pronunciation teaching or proper guidance. In Sri Lanka, since there has been no general agreement on pronunciation teaching, it is being considered merely a supplementary task which is often overlooked. As a result of this, certain phonological features have got fossilized in the code repertoire of English as second language learners in Sri Lanka. Past studies on phonology in Sri Lanka bear evidence that phonological deviations can lead to a class distinction in Sri Lankan society which can even have an adverse outcome at a job interview or any social gathering (Parakrama, 1995; Gunesekera, 2005). The aim of this study is to record literature on pronunciation teaching in Sri Lanka and to investigate reasons for fossilization of phonological features. A questionnaire was administered among 25 high proficiency learners who have been pursuing higher studies in English medium to find out reasons for English as Second Language learners in Sri Lanka to substitute the mid back vowel/o/for the low back vowel/ɔ/. According to literature, L1 dominance on L2 attributes for learners to deviate from the codified norms of the Standard Sri Lankan English (SSLE). In line with the Noticing Hypothesis, the Output Hypothesis, and the Interactional model, the findings showcase that the lack of sufficient guidance and the lack of awareness on the part of facilitators and learners respectively are the most salient factors that prevent the formation of new phonological categories which do not exist in the L1. It is recommended for facilitators to make learners aware of their phonological errors to avoid fossilization of erroneous forms.

Keywords


English as Second Language Learner In Sri Lanka, Phonological Error, Fossilization, Low Back Vowel, Mid Back Vowel

Full Text:

PDF

References


Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 21(1), 46-66.

Flege, J. E. (1992). Speech learning in a second language. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn& C. Stoel-Gammaon (Eds.), Phonological Development Models, Research, Publications: York Press.

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052

Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, p.13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310402611

Gunesekera, M. (2005). The Post-Colonial Identity of Sri Lankan English: Katha Publishers.

Karunarathne,I.(2003). Teaching English in urban Sri Lanka: Some pedagogical issues.10-14.

Karunatillake, W.S. (2004). An introduction to spoken Sinhala. Godage International Publishers (Pvt) Ltd.

Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. outledge: London and New York.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.

Parakrama, A. (1995). De-Hegemonizing language standards: Learning from (post) colonial Englishes about 'English': St. Martin's Press.p.87. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371309

Rochet, B. L. (1995). Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Issues in Cross-Language Research. York Press.

Senaratne, C.D. (2014). A study of Sinhalizations in Sinhala-English Mixed Discourse. Advances in Language and Literary Studies,5(6),10-17. Doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.10 https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.10

Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. Calico Journal, 28(3), 744-765. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765

Widyalankara, R. C. (2014). Dialectal variation in Sri Lankan English Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis. LAP Publications: Amazon.

Wijetunge, S, N. (2008)."The stigma of "Not Pot English" in Sri Lanka: A study of the production of /o/ and /ɔ / and implications for instructions." Master's thesis, Georgia State University, Georgia. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=alesl_theses




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.