The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching on Motivation and Grammatical Achievement of EFL Junior High School Students

Islam NamazianDost, Ghassem Bohloulzadeh, Abdolreza Pazhakh


This research sought to investigate the effect of the effect of task-based language teaching on motivation and grammatical achievement of EFL junior high school students of Ahvaz. To fulfill the objectives of the study a Homogeneity test (Oxford Quick Placement Test) was administered among 100 students at the junior high school and finally 80 participants were selected. Then, they were divided into two sub­groups, namely control and experimental groups. Before starting the treatment, a validated teacher-made grammar test in terms of the materials supposed to be covered in both groups was administered to them as the pre-test. Moreover, a motivation questionnaire were given to both groups at the beginning and at the end of study. Then the experimental group received the treatment, which was teaching and learning grammar through using task-based language teaching and the control group received traditional teaching which is teaching grammar through instruction on examples and drills proposed by the teacher. After 12 sessions of treatment, the two groups were administered the same teacher-made grammar test as posttest. Data were analyzed by Paired and Independent Samples t-­test. The findings showed that the experimental group significantly performed better than the control group. Generally, the experimental groups outperformed the control groups. Furthermore, the results of motivation questionnaire show that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups' motivation in the post-test of questionnaire which implies that the experimental group's motivation increased significantly. The results suggest that task-based language teaching can be used in English classes to develop grammar ability among Iranian EFL learners.



Strategy, Tasked-based Language Teaching (TBLT), Communicative language teaching (CLT), Motivation

Full Text:



Afandi, W., Jufrizal, J., & Narius, D. (2013). The ability of the third grade students in using different kinds of prepositios. Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(25), 625-639.

Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency‘. Modern Language Journal, 65(4), 24–35.

Birjandi P., & Malmir, A. (2011). The effect of task-based approach on the Iranian advanced EFL learners’ narrative vs. Expository writing. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(5), 1-26

Branden, K. V. (2006). Task Based Language Education from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn. New York: Routledge.

Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Cohen, A. (1990). Language Learning: insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York, Newbury House.

Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. New York, Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Cohen, A. D., & Weaver, S. J. (2006). Styles- and strategies-based instruction. A teachers´ guide. Minneapolis: Centre for Advanced research on language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.

Crystal, D. (2004). Rediscover grammar (3rd ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ellis, R. (1990). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eliss, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fotos, S. and Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Tanya Stabler.

Hu, R. (2013). Task-based language teaching: responses from Chinese teachers of English. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 16(4), 1-24.

Kapalan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co.

Khalili Sabet, M., & Tahriri, A. (2014). The impact of task-based approach on Iranian

EFL learners‟ motivation in writing research abstracts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 953-962.

Klammer, T. P., Muriel, R. S., & Angela, D. V. (2000). Analyzing English grammar. San Fransisco: Pearson Education Company.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford, OUP.

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based. In K. Hyltenstam, & M. Pienemann, Modelling and assessing, 377-93.

Long, M.H. & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (ed.) encyclopedia of language teaching, p.597-603.. London: Routledge

Maugham, S. W. (1938). The summing up. England: Garden City Publishing Company.

Mohammadi. M. (2006). The effect of task-based method on learning of there is/ there are in English. M.A Thesis. Isfahan, Isfahan University. (Persian).

Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. and Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner‘. Research in Education Series, No. 7, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Nemat Tabrizi, A. R. (2011). The effect of using task-based activities on speaking proficiency of EFL learners, The Third Asian Conference on Education 2011 Official Osaka, Japan Proceeding. 334-345.

Newby, D. (2003). Cognitive communicative theory of pedagogical grammar. Habilitationsschrift: Karl-Francens Universität Graz.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O‘Malley, J. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

O´Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESl students. Language Learning, 35(1), 21–4.

Oxford, r. l. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS, survival manual, a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, NY, Open University Press.

Pietri, N. J. M. (2015). The Effects of Task-Based Learning on Thai Students’ Skills and Motivation. Asean journal of management & innovation, 3(4), 72-80.

Prabhu, N. (1 987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rezaeyan, M. (2014). On the impact of task-based teaching on academic achievement of Iranian EFL learners (case study: female high school students in Yasuj). International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 7 (3), 476-493.

Richard, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts, P. (1953). Understanding grammar. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Rubin, J. 1975. What the good language learner can teach us‘. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41 –51.

Schacter, D. (2011). Psychology. United States of America: Catherine Woods.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task- based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17 (1), 38-62.

Soleimani, H., & Khandan, M. (2013). The effect of telling short stories on learning grammar among EFL high school students in Iran. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(2), 110-122.

Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swan, M. (2005). What is grammar? In Beaven, B (ed.), IATEFL. Cardiff Conference Selections: 60-61.

Tale, M., & Goodarzi, A. (2015). The impacts of task-based teaching on grammar learning by Iranian first grade high school students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 145-153.

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage‘. Language Learning, 30 (2): 417–431.

Today, P. (2013). Motivation. Retrieved from psychology today:

Ur, P. (1991). Grammar practice activities. A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weaver, C., McNally, C., & Moerman, S. (2001). To grammar or not to grammar: That is not the question! Voices from the Middle, 8(3). 17-33. Retrieved from

Wenden, A. L. (1987). Incorporating learner training in the classroom. In A. Wenden & Joan Rubin (eds), 159-167.

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Willis, J. (1 996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman Addison.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University press.

Zhang, X., & Hung, S-C. (2012). A case study of exploring viability of task-based instruction on college English teaching in big-sized class. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 693-699.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.