An Investigation of the Learning Strategies as Bias Factors in Second Language Cloze Tests

Parviz Ajideh, Massoud Yaghoubi-Notash, Abdolreza Khalili

Abstract


The present study investigated the contribution of the EFL students’ learning strategies to the explanation of the variance in their results on language tests. More specifically, it examined the role of these strategies as bias factors in the results of English cloze tests.  Based on this aim, first, 158 intermediate EFL learners were selected from among 324 language learners of a private language institute in Urmia (Iran) as the participants of the study based on their results on a proficiency test. Second, the selected participants respectively received Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and the cloze test of the study for the assessment of their learning strategies and English cloze test performance during two sessions in a one-week period. The standard multiple regression was employed for data analysis. The results of the study showed that, there were significant positive correlations between the learners’ metacognitive strategies and cognitive strategies and their cloze test performance. Based on these results, it was argued that, the learners’ learning strategies may be systematic test bias factors in second language cloze tests. The results of the present study may have useful practical implications for the EFL teachers and syllabus designers. Moreover, these results may provide certain theoretical guidelines for second language testing specialists.

 


Keywords


individual learner differences, learning strategies, test bias, test performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajideh, P., & Gholami, V. (2015). Investigating learning strategies as predictors of test performance. Academie Royale des Sciences D outre-Mer Bulletin des Seances, 4 (3), 183-191.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 65, 24-35.

Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second-language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Bley-Vroman, R. (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 19-30). New York: Newbury House.

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley: Newbury House.

Chamot, A. U., Kupper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1988). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: Findings of the longitudinal study. McLean, Va: Interstate Research Associates.

Chamot, A. U., O’ Malley, J., Kupper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. Rosslyn, Va: Interstate Research Associates.

Chamot, A. U., & Rubin, J. (1994). Comments on Janie Rees-Miller’s “A critical appraisal of learner training: Theoretical bases and teaching implications”. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 771–776.

Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow: Longman.

Cohen, A. D., & Chi, J. C. (2001). Language strategy use survey. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ehrman, M. E. (1990). The role of personality type in adult language learning: An ongoing investigation. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 126–178). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Regents.

Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 1-13.

Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525–551). Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner’s perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 43-59.

Farhady, H., Ja ‘farpur, A., & Birjandi, P. (1994). Testing language skills: From theory to practice. Tehran: SAMT Publishers.

Fowler, W. S., & Coe, N. (1976). Nelson English language tests. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.

Gliksman, L., Gardner, R. C., Smythe, P. (1982). The role of integrative motivation on students’ participation in the French classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 38, 625-647.

Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a second language. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Horwitz, E. K. (2000). Teachers and students, students and teachers: An ever-evolving partnership. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 523-535.

Huang, X. H., & Van Naersson, M. (1985). Learning strategies for oral communication. Applied Linguistics, 6, 287-307.

Kaylani, C. (1996). The influence of gender and motivation on EFL learning strategy use in Jordan. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 75–88). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Lee, L., & Gundersen, E. (2011). Intermediate select readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lesly, T., Hansen, Ch., & Zukowski, J. (2003). New interchange passages placement and evaluation package. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy. Applied Linguistics, 22, 241-265.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd Ed.). New York: Tylor and Francis.

Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school: A pragmatic approach. London: Longman.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235–247.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175–187.

Oxford, R. L. (1996). Afterword: What have we learned about language learning strategies around the world? In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 247–249). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1999). Learning strategies. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics (pp. 518–522). Oxford: Elsevier.

Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 86-111). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd Ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill House.

Peacock, M., & Ho, M. (2003). Student learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 1-20.

Phakiti, A. (2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 1, 53-96.

Politzer, R., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103-123.

Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47, 289-325.

Reiss, M. A. (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 39, 257–266.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th Ed.). Edinburg: Pearson Education.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.15-19). New York: Prentice Hall.

Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp.313-359). Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Spolsky, B. (1973). What does it mean to know a language or how do you get someone to perform his competence. In J. W. Oller & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Focus on the learner (pp. 164-176). Rowley: Newbury House.

Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). San Diego: Academic Press.

Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.91

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.