EFL Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions of Grammatical Difficulties

Maha Alhaysony, Eid Alhaisoni

Abstract


This paper investigates grammatical difficulty from the perspective of Saudi university students, of EFL as well as from the perspective of university teachers. It aims to find out which English grammar features are more difficult/less difficult than others. Furthermore, it attempts to determine the reasons and causes that account for such grammar difficulty. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were the two research instruments used in this study. A total number of 103 students and 85 university teachers took part in the questionnaire, while only 20 teachers and 25 students responded in the interview. All the participants were from Aljouf University (males and females). The results showed that some English grammar features were more difficult and some were less difficult than others. The obtained difficulty order determined by EFL learners and the one obtained by the teachers’ perceptions were compared. Some similarities and differences were found to exist in the rank order of the features for the two groups. The findings of the study may be beneficial to syllabus designers, material developers, teachers and EFL learners.

 


Keywords


Perception, grammar, EFL learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahangari, S. and Barghi, A. (2012). Consistency of Measured accuracy in grammar knowledge tests and writing : TOFEL PBT. Language Testing in Asia, 2(2), p. 5-21.

Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), p. 183-210.

Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all?: Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), p. 543-574.

Al-Mekhlafi, a. and Nagaratnam, R. (2011). Difficulties in teaching and learning grammar in an EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), p. 69-92.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second language acquisition. Language

Learning, 37, p. 385-407.

Bastone, R. (1994). Grammar. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Berent, G. (1985). Markedness considerations in the acquisition of conditional sentences. Language Learning, 35(3), p. 337-372.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), p. 1-47.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Corder, S. P. (1988) Pedagogic grammars. In W. Rutherford & M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), Grammar and Second Language Teaching. A Book of Readings. New York: Newbury House Publishers, p. 123–145.

Darus, S. and Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Silences, 8(3), p. 483-595.

Debata, P. (2013). The importance of grammar in English language teaching- A reassessment. Language in India, 13(5), p. 482-486

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (p. 313-348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

DeKeyser, R., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, p. 613-642.

Dulay, H. S., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, p. 37-53.

Ellis, N. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), p. 143-188.

Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (p. 339-360). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxfoed University Press.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Disentangling focus on form. A response to Sheen and O’Neill (2005). Applied Linguistics, 27(1), p. 135-141.

Feike, G. (2011). Grammar sequencing in basic ESL. MA dissertation. San Diego State University.

Graus, J. and Coppen, P. (2016). Defining grammatical difficulty: A student teacher perspective. Language Awareness, 24(2), p. 101-122.

Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13(2), p. 168-184.

Housen, A. (2002). The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of

tense-aspect morphology (p. 155_198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hulstijn, J.H., & De Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, p. 97-112.

Kachru, Y. 2010. Pedagogical grammars for second language learning. In M. Berns (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, (p.172–178).

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003a). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003b). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching (p. 105-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lightbown, P. (2000). Anniversary article, classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), p. 431-462.

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, p. 399-432.

Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(2), p. 453-498.

McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (p. 323-338). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Nan, C. (2015). Grammar and grammaring: Toward modes for English grammar teaching in China. English Language Teaching, 8(12), p. 79-85.

Palmer, F.(1972). Grammar. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

Rimmer, W. (2006). Measuring grammatical complexity: the Gordian knot. Language Testin, 23, p. 497-519.

Rutherford, W. 1987. Second language grammar: learning and teaching. London: Longman.

Saaristo, P. (2015). Grammar is the heart of language: Grammar and its role in language learning among Finnish University students. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas (Eds), Voices of pedagogical development - Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning (p. 279-318). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000296.

Sawir, E. (2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: The effect of prior learning experience. International Education Journal, 6(5), p. 567-580.

Scheffler, P. (2011). Rule difficulty: Teachers’ intuitions and learners’ performance. Language Awareness, 30(3), p. 221-237.

Schmitt, N. (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics. New York: OUP.

Shiu, L. (2011). Chinese EFL learners’ perceptions of grammatical difficulty. English Teaching and Learning, 35(3), p. 129-162.

Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & White, J. (2005). The importance of meaning in explicit form-focused instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Current issues in instructed second language learning (p. 199-234). Brussels, Belgium: Mouton De Gruyter.

Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), p. 263-308.

Wang, F. (2010). The necessity of grammar teaching. English Language Teaching, 3(2), p. 78-81.

White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (p. 85-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Grammar and nonsense and learning. In H. G.Widdowson, Aspects of language teaching, (p. 79-98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 139-155). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.