The Ineffectiveness of the Provision of Input on the Problematic Grammatical Feature of Articles

Gareth Morgan

Abstract


This study examined the value of giving specific input on the use of articles on an undergraduate English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course. This topic was chosen as previous cohorts had generated a noticeable amount of errors in their use of articles, and developing written grammatical accuracy was one of the course’s aims. Participants were provided with input on the definite, indefinite and zero articles. This involved providing images of authentic article errors, and catering for the interpersonal learner, with emphasis on student: student interaction. Also, a newspaper article was incorporated to illustrate how grammar works at a textual level, and because research has shown that accuracy in the use of the definite article increases during contextualized tasks exploiting authentic materials learners can relate to. However, the lack of effectiveness of highlighting this grammatical feature is illustrated by the students’ post-input writing, which generated more errors than the pre-input task, pro rata. In the post-input essay, there was one error for every 25 of the noun phrases, the equivalent of an error every 131 words. In comparison, the rate of errors in the pre-input work was one in every 28 of the noun phrases, or an error every 153 words. Therefore, due to the 16.7% increase in post-input errors, in future, I will not focus on this grammatical feature when attempting to improve written accuracy.


Keywords


Articles, countability, demonstratives, determiners, possessive pronouns, problematic grammatical issues, quantifying determiners, written accuracy

Full Text:

PDF

References


$130,000 to repair Picasso’s Dream. (2006, November 13). The Straits Times, p.15.

Abrahams, M. (2006, August 1). For definite: A definite article on the definite article. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2006/aug/01/highereducation.research

Allen, R., & Rochecouste, J. (1997). Intervention in the tertiary writing process. TESOL in Context, 7(2), 9-13.

Berry, R. (1991). Re-articulating the articles. ELT Journal, 45(3), 252-259.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman’s student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Blackstone, B., & Wilkinson, M. (2011). Blogging for pedagogical purposes: A transformational methodology for post-secondary education. In C. Ho & A. Leong (Eds.), Transforming literacies and language: Innovative technologies, integrated experiences (pp. 187-206). London: Continuum.

Brown, A. (1999). Singapore English in a nutshell. Singapore: Times Media Private Limited.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Brozo, W.G. (2005). Connecting with students who are disinterested and inexperienced. Thinking Classroom, 6(3), 42-43.

Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., & Tetreault, J. (2010). The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 419-436.

Chrabaszcz, A., & Jiang, N. (2014). The role of the native language in the use of the English non-generic definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research, 30(3), 351–379.

Cives-Enriques, R-M. (2003). Materials for adults: I am no good at languages! – Inspiring and motivating L2 adult learners of beginner’s Spanish. In B. Tomlinson. (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 239-255). London: Continuum.

Ferris, D.R. (2004). The “Grammar Correction Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.

García Mayo, M. del P. (2008). The acquisition of four non-generic uses of the article the by Spanish EFL learners. System, 36(4), 550–565. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.08.001

Han, N-R., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2006). Detecting errors in English article usage by non-native speakers. Natural Language Engineering, 12(02), 115-129.

Hewings, M. (2001). Advanced grammar in use: A self-study reference and practice book for advanced learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krech, P., and Driver, K. (1996) Can articles be taught? In J. Miller, Most of ESL students have trouble with the articles. International Education Journal, ERC2004 Special Issue, 5(5), pp. 80-88. (2005).

Lindstromberg, S. (1986). Guidelines for teaching the English article system. Cross Currents, 13(1), 31-41.

Liu, D., & Gleason, J.L. (2002). Acquisition of the article the by non-native speakers of English. An analysis of four non-generic uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(01), pp. 1–26.

Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25(2), pp. 215-232.

Master, P. (2002). Information structure and English article pedagogy. System, 30, 331–348.

Miller, J. (2005). Most of ESL students have trouble with the articles. International Education Journal, ERC2004 Special Issue, 5(5), pp. 80-88.

Morgan, G. (2014). The effect of overt prepositional input on students‟ written accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(5), 202-212.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(06), pp 126-145.

Nunan, D. (1998). Teaching grammar in context. ELT Journal, 52(2), 101-112.

Pica, T. (2007). Time, teachers, and tasks in focus on form instruction. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form focused instruction in teacher education. Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 161– 176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J.C., & Reppen, R. (2014). Towards a pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, 45(1), 5-25.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinha, T.S. (2014). Acquisition of the non-generic uses of English definite article by the adult ESL learners. Language in India, 14(2), 224-245.

Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (2009). The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 207–223.

Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335-355.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Introduction. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wong, B. E., & Quek, S. T. (2007). Acquisition of the English definite article by Chinese and Malay ESL learners. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 210-234.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.79

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.