A Critical Review of Prominent Theories of Politeness

Hutheifa Y. Al-Duleimi, Sabariah Md. Rashid, Ain Nadzimah Abdullah

Abstract


Politeness plays a crucial role in all cultures and societies for maintaining relationships and for face saving. Although politeness is common to all cultures and languages, how it functions and is realised varies from one culture to another. Different theories have been proposed to examine the strategies with which politeness is expressed. Each theory has weak and strong points which may make it appropriate to a culture but not to another. The most widely used of these theories are Brown and Levinson’s (1978) and its modified version (1987), Lakoff’s (1973), and Leech’s (1983, 2005) theories of politeness. This paper aims to provide a critical review of the aforementioned theories. Specifically, it discusses different scholars’ viewpoints on these theories, highlighting the weak and strong points of the theories. Accordingly, it examines the applicability of these theories to the East and West cultures. A review of these theories indicated that they have weak points as well as strong ones. Furthermore, they might not be suitable for all cultures. This confirms that politeness is a social behaviour not specific to one culture or language. Critical review revealed that Leech’s (2005) Grand Strategy of Politeness might be the most applicable theory that could cover aspects of Eastern and Western cultures.    

Keywords: prominent politeness theories, Eastern culture, Western culture


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashizuka, A., Mima, T., Sawamoto, N., Aso, T., Oishi, N., Sugihara, G., & Fukuyama, H. (2015). Functional relevance of the precuneus in verbal politeness. Neuroscience research, 91, 48-56.

Brookins, T. A. (2010). A politeness analysis of Catullus’ polymetric poems: Can Leech's GSP cross the ancient–modern divide? Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1283-1295.

Brown, P. (1976). “Women and politeness: A new perspective on language and society. Review of ‘Language and woman’s place’ by R. Lakoff”. Reviews in Anthropology 3: 240–249.

Brown, P., and Stephen, L. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brunet, P. M., Cowie, R., Donnan, H., & Douglas-Cowie, E. (2012). Politeness and social signals. Cognitive processing, 13(2), 447-453.

Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: a proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 87--106.

Chen, R. (2005). Universalism vs. particularism: whither pragmatics? Modern Foreign Languages 28, 120--128.

Chen, R. (2010). Pragmatics between east and west: similar or different? In: Trosborg, Anna (Ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures (Handbooks of Pragmatics 7). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 167--188.

Chen, R., He, L., & Hu, C. (2013). Chinese requests: In comparison to American and Japanese requests and with reference to the “East-West divide”. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 140-161.

Dybko, K. (2010). The Role of Politeness in Advertisements’ Slogans: A Study within Gricean Pragmatics. ACTA PHILOLOGICA, 20.

Eelen, G. (2001). Critique of Politeness Theories. St. Jerome Press, Manchester.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

Ermida, I. (2006). Linguistic mechanisms of power in Nineteen Eighty-Four: Applying politeness theory to Orwell's world. Journal of pragmatics, 38(6), 842-862.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman.

Franck, D. (1980). Grammatik und Konversation. Dusseldorf.

Fukada, A., & Asato, N. (2004). Universal politeness theory: application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(11), 1991--2002.

Grice, H. P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J. L. (1975). Syntax and semantics. Logic and conversation, 3, 41-58.

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237--257.

Haugh, M. (2005). The importance of ‘‘place’’ in Japanese politeness: implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(1), 41--68.

Hill, B., Sachiko, I., Shako, I., Akiko, K, Tsunao & Ogino. R. (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10(3), 347--371.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. New York: Longman.

Holmes, J. (2001). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Longman.

Ide. D. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8, 223-248.

Kida, I. (2011). Language distance across cultures as a way of expressing politeness and not only. In Aspects of Culture in Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning (pp. 183-191). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Kitamura, N. (2000). Adapting Brown and Levinson’s ‘politeness’ theory to the analysis of casual conversation. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 1-8).

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: or minding your p’s and q’s. In: Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 292--305.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in society, 2(01), 45-79.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.

Lambert, B. L. (1996). Face and politeness in pharmacist-physician interaction. Social science & medicine, 43(8), 1189-1198.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.

Leech, G. (2005). Politeness: is there an East-West divide. Journal of Foreign Languages, 6(3).

Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 167--206.

Mao, R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘‘face’’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451--486.

Martínez-Flor, A. (2007). Analysing request modification devices in films: Implications for pragmatic learning in instructed foreign language contexts. In Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 245-280). Springer Netherlands.

Matsuoka, R., & Poole, G. (2015). Politeness Strategies in Healthcare Communication at" Difficult Times": A Pragmatic Analysis of the" Manga" Discourse in" Nurse Aoi". Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 89-109.

Matsuoka, R., Smith, I., & Uchimura, M. (2011). Discourse Analysis of Encouragement in Healthcare Manga. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 49-66.

Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Politeness and conversational universals: observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8, 207--221.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Pizziconi, B. (2003). Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10/11), 1471--1506.

Reiter, R. M. (2000). Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. John Benjamins B.V.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.W., (2001). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.

Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1987). Relevance. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.

Tannen, Deborah (1984) Conversational Style: analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Terkourafi, M. (2005). An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness.Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, 139, 99.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction. New York: Longman.

Usami, Mayumi, 2002. Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation: Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo.

Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., & Gratch, J. (2010). Facial expressions and politeness effect in foreign language training system. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 165-173). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Watts, R.J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Cultural-Specific Configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction (2nd edn.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wijayanto, A., Laila, M., Prasetyarini, A., & Susiati, S. (2013). Politeness in Interlanguage Pragmatics of Complaints by Indonesian Learners of English.English Language Teaching, 6(10), p188.

Yoshimura, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Honorifics: A sociocultural verb agreement cuein Japanese sentence processing (vol. 31, p. 551, 2010). Appl. Psycholinguist, 32,243–244.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.