Investigating Identity, Ambivalence, Hybridity: A Bhabhaian Reading of J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and Disgrace

Jalal Mostafaee

Abstract


The present paper seeks to investigate J.M. Coetzee's Foe and Disgrace in terms of Homi K. Bhabha's concept of Identities/Subjectivities. Homi K.  Bhabha is one of the most important contemporary figure in postcolonial studies; he argues that ambivalence is existed at the site of colonial dominance. He argues that ambivalence is existed at the site of colonial dominance. The colonizer forcefully asserts his superiority to the colonized, but the feeling of fear is created concerning identity, which is imposed on them. The paper also seeks on the notion of hybridity which indicates that the practices of colonial authority is intermingling other texts and discourses which results in a hybridization that facilitates colonial domination.  Bhabha's reading of Lacan accords well with the ambivalence he traces in various writers. It is what Lacan calls the mirror stage that is central to Bhabha's reading. Bhabha believes that ‘’the mirror stage encapsulates what happens in colonial discourse's stereotyping productions: the mirror stage is at least a good model for the colonial situation’’. Bhabha suggests that like’’ the mirror phase the fullness of the stereotype_ its image as identity_ is always threatened by lack.’’ A telling and recurring idea in Coetzee's fiction is that the force of the colonizer is formative of the identity of the colonized, something to be embraced and this paper aims to investigate this closely by using Bhabha's concepts.

Keywords: Ambivalence, Apartheid, Colonial discourse, Hybridity, Marginality, Mimicry, Stereotype, Uncanny


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London; New York: Routledge.

Borbor T. (2010). Towards a new geographical consciousness: a study of place in the novels of V. S. Naipul and J. M. Coetzee, Ph. D. Thesis University of Sussex..

Chapman, Michael(2006). “Postcolonialism: A Literary Turn.” English in Africa. .

Coetzee, J. M. (2001). Stranger Shores. New York: Penguin Books.

Coetzee, J. M. (1999). Disgrace. London: Secker and Warburg.

Coetzee, J. M. (1992). Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews. Ed. David Attwell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Coetzee, J. M. (2003). He and His Man

Donoghue, D. (1987). "Her man Friday". The New York Times.

Durrant, S. (2004). Postcolonial Narrative and the Work of Mourning: J.M. Coetzee, Wilson Harris, and Toni Morrison, State University of New York, Albany, 2 .

Habib M. A. R. (2005).A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present, Blackwell, Malden.

Head, D. (2009) . The Cambridge Introduction to J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge : Cambridge

University Press.

Huddart, D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabha. London; NewYork: Routledge.

McRobbie, A. (2005). The Uses of Cultural Studies: A Textbook, Sage Publications, London.

McGrath, P. (1994). "To Be Conscious Is to Suffer". New York Times.

Ranjbar, R and Farahbakhsh, A.(2016). Bhabha’s notion of unhomeliness in J.M.Coetzee’s Foe: A postcolonial reading. Gilan University

Spivak, G. ( 2006 )“Can the Subaltern Speak?” The Post-Colonial Studies Reader.

Ed. Bill Ashcroft et al. London: Routledge,. 28-37.

Tiffin, H. (2006). "Post-Colonial Literatures and Counter-Discourse." The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Bill Ashcroft et al. London: Routledge.

Tyson, L. (2011). Using Critical Theory: How to Read and Write about Literature, Routledge, New York.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.