An Evaluation of Top Notch Fundamentals B: A Four Phase Study

Marzie Ahmadi

Abstract


Textbooks play an important role in educational contexts especially in EFL contexts their role are more highlighted. Textbook evaluation in any type, predictive or retrospective, is a necessary part of curriculum design and in this sense is a worthwhile means of conducting research. Recently, Top Notch series have become widely used in Iranian English Institutes and in high schools and pre-university schools. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate Top Notch Fundamentals B based on first, authors’ objectives, and second, the cultural content of the book based on the framework proposed by Ferit Kilickaya (2004). Thirdly, the universal characteristics of EFL materials proposed by Ansari and Babaii was used to see to what extent the book matches those characteristics. The amount and type(s) of technological use was also examined. The strengths and some drawbacks of the book for EFL setting use were also mentioned in the study. The findings would be beneficial for teachers and material developers in EFL contexts.

Keywords:  Material, material evaluation, Top Notch Fundamentals B, Ferit Kilickaya framework, Ansari and Babaii framework, technological use, authors’ claims


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbari Kelishadi, A. & Sharifzadeh, A. (2013). An evaluation of Top Notch series. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 4(4), 60-73.

Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want Teaching Material for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-13.

Ascher, A., & Saslow, J. (2011). Top Notch Series. Longman: Pearson Education.

Azizifar, A., Koosha, M., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 36-44.

Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. New York: Heinle Publishers.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your Coursebook Oxford: Heinemann Publishers Ltd.

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36

Eslami Rasekh, A., Esmaeli, S., Ghavamnia, M., & Rajabi, S. (2010). Don’t judge a book by its cover. Textbook evaluation in the EFL setting. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(14), 448-461.

Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic materials and cultural content in EFL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal. X (7).

Fetsko, W. (1992). Approaching Textbook Selection Systematically in Herlihy, J. G. (Ed.). the Textbook Controversy-Issues, Aspect, Perspective. New Jersey, Norwood.

Haldeman, M. (2008). The new teacher’s guide to success: A personalized planning guide for teachers. Shell Education Publication.

Hutchinson, T & Torres, E. (1994). The Textbook as an Agent of Change. ELT Journal, 48(4).

Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson. T. (1987). What is underneath? An interactive view of the materials evaluation. In L. E. Sheldon (ed.), ELT textbooks and materials: Problems in evaluation and development, (pp. 37-44), Oxford: Modern English Publications.

Jahangard, A. (2007). The evaluation of the EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools Karen’s Linguistics Issues. Retrieved October 15, 2011, from http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/bymonth.html.

Kayapinar, U. (2009). Coursebook evaluation by English teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, (10), 69-78.

Kilickaya, F. (2004). Guidelines to Evaluate Cultural Content in Textbooks. The Internet TESL Journal, X (12). Retrieved from: http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kilickaya-CulturalContent/.

Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), materials Development in Language Teaching, 190-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McDonough,J. & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. (2nd Ed).Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The Reading Matrix, 5(2).

Nation, I.S.P. & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge.

Riazi, A. M., & Mosallanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian high-school and pre-university English textbooks using Bloom’s taxonomy. TESL-EJ Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13(4).

Richards, J. C. (2005). The role of Textbooks in a language program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials Development and Research: Making the Connection. Regional Language Center Journal, 37 (1), 5-26.

Sahargard, R., Rahimi, A., & Zaremoayeddi, I. (2008). An in-depth evaluation of interchange series (3rd ED.). Porta Linguarum, 12(1), 37-54.

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook Selection and Evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 432-453. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Straddling, R. (2001). Teaching 20th-century European history. Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Ur, Penny (1996). A Course in language teaching-practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, D. (1983). Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-255.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.