A Comparative Study of the Figures of Speech between Top 50 English and Persian Pop Song Lyrics

Farshid Tayari Ashtiani, Ali Derakhshesh

Abstract


This paper is a corpus-based comparative discourse analysis of top fifty pop English and Persian song lyrics in 2014 to investigate the production of four figures of speech including metaphor, simile, personification, and hyperbole. The English corpus was compiled from the End-Year 2014 Chart of Billboard and the Persian corpus was complied from the most downloaded songs and the results of an informal inquiry among the researchers’ friends and colleagues for the most favorite songs in 2014. Firstly, the four figures of speech were identified and counted in the English and Persian verses twice by the researchers who were Persian graduates of TEFL and a doctoral candidate of English Literature. Then, a joint session was held among them, and a consensus was reached on the discrepancies. Afterwards, the frequencies were submitted to chi-square analysis. The results revealed that there was a significant difference in the usage of figures of speech between the two languages. Persian song lyrics contained more figures of speech both overall and separately; although, there was not any significant difference in the frequency usage of simile and metaphor between the two languages, Persian lyricists used hyperbole and personification more frequently compared to English lyricists.

Keywords: song lyrics, figures of speech, simile, metaphor, hyperbole, personification


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, T. M., & Fuller, D. B. (2006). The words have changed but the ideology remains the same: Misogynistic lyrics in rap music. Journal of Black Studies, 36(6), 938-957.

Ashtiani, T. F., & Zafarghandi. A. M. (2015). The effect of English verbal songs on the connected speech aspects of English learners’ speech production. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 3(1)

Bentley, C. R. (1972). English for higher school certificate. Sidney: Hogbin.

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dodson, J. (2008). The Power of personification: Rhetorical purpose in the book of wisdom and the letter to the Romans. NY: Walter de Gruyter.

DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Jr., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2011). Turning into psychological change: Linguistic markers of psychological traits and emotions over time in popular U.S song lyrics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 200-207.

Falk, J (2012). We Will Rock You: A Diachronic Corpus-based Analysis of Linguistic Features in Rock Lyrics (Unpublished BA Thesis). Linnaeus University.

Flex Your Literary Muscles (2004). Chapter 12, part6. Copyright 2004, McGraw-Hill.

Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarities. Psychological review

Juslin, N. P., & Sloboda, A. J. (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Katznelson, N. J., Gelman, K., Lindblom, & Caput, M. (2010). American song lyrics: A corpus-based research project featuring twenty years in Rock, Pop, Country, and Hip-Hop. San Francisco State University.

Kreyer, R., & Mukherjee, J. (2007). The style of pop song lyrics: A corpus-linguistic pilot study. Anglia-Zeitschrift fur englische Philologie, 125(1), 31-58.

Logan, B., Kositsky, A., & Moreno, P. (2004) Semantic Analysis of Song Lyrics. Hewlett Packard Labs. Cambridge, USA.

Mangseth, H. (2010). Nonstandard English features in the song lyrics of the best-selling music in Sweden. Hogskolan I Gavle

Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25(1), 45-53.

Perrine, L. (1992). Sound, and sense, an introduction to poetry. (8th Edition). London: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.

Petrie, K., & Pennebaker J. (2008). Things we said today: a linguistic analysis of the Beatles. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(4), 197-202.

Pettijohn, T. F., & Sacco, Donald F. jr. (2009). The language of lyrics: An analysis of popular billboard songs across conditions of social and economic threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(3), 297-311.

Puigderajols, A. (2001). A linguistic study of the magic in Disney lyrics. Barcelona.

Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, (5)3, 159-163.

Rosa, A., & Eschholz, P. (1982). Models for writers: Short essays. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Yeibo. B. (2012). Figurative language and stylistic function in J. P. Clark-Bekederemo’s poetry. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, (3)1, 180-187.

Wang, Sh. (2005). Corpus-based Approaches and Discourse Analysis in Relation to Reduplication and Repetition. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 505-540


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.