Analysis of the Discourse of Power in Etel Adnan's Play Like A Christmas Tree

Hossam Mahmoud Alashqar

Abstract


This paper seeks to investigate the sources of power in the discourse of an Arab-American writer, Etel Adnan's one act play, Like a Christmas Tree. The play represents a heated argument between two figures who stand for two different ideologies and who fall within the frame of 'binary opposition', transcultural misunderstanding, and colonial hegemony versus native resistance. Supposedly, an American Journalist, Jim, is expected to dominate the discourse by force of his cultural and professional background, but sarcastically enough, the Iraqi butcher, Badr is the part who represents power and domination throughout the play. The current paper depends on more than one tool of analysis: Norman Fairclough's (2001) and Foucault's(2004) concepts of power and discourse, Grice's theory of 'cooperative principles'(1989), Brown and Gilman's study of 'address forms' (1972), and Georgia Green's contribution in the process of 'turn-taking' (1989).The study celebrates an analysis of data which uncovers the power of discourse in the exchanges of both characters and sheds light on the identity of both of them in an attempt to affirm that 'power' is not necessarily on the side of the stronger.

Keywords: discourse, power, address forms, turn-taking, interruption, topic control     


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adna, E. (1999). Like a Christmas Tree. In Post Gibran Anthology of New Arab American Writing (Eds).Munir Akash & khaled Mattawa. (Jusoor 11/12). New York : Syracuse University Press. All forthcoming references are to this edition

Afful, J. B. A. (2006). Address forms among university students in Ghana: a case study. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 6(1), 76–91.

Brown, J., and Gilman, D. (1972). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity in Language and Social Context: Selected Readings. Ed.p.p Giglioli. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 252-282.

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. and Bamberg, M. (eds.) (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power, (2nd edition). London: Pearson Education Limited.

Foucault, M. (1998). From the history of sexuality. In D. Richter (Ed.), The critical tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends (pp. 1472-1481). New York: Bedford/St. Martin.

- ------------ (1996). Foucault Live: Interviews, 1961–1984, Sylvère Lotringer (ed), Lysa Hochroth & John Johnson (trans), New York: Semiotext(e).

Green, G. M. (1989).Pragmatic and Natural Language Understanding. London and New Jersey: University of Illinois and Lawrence E.LBaum Associates.

Grice, H.P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’ In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics,3, 41-58.

Karlberg, Michael. (2005). The Power of Discourse and The Discourse of Power: Pursuing Peace Through Discourse Intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies, 10(1).

Kuhi, D. & Hassanimehr, M. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis of Pygmalion By George Bernard Shaw". International Journal Of Linguistics and Literature,2(5), 21-34

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. Harper & Row. New York.

Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgard, J., & Oksefjell, S. (Eds.) (---). Out of Corpora: Studies in Honor of Stig Johansson (pp. 107-118). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Mudhafar Ali, W. (2013). The Construction of Identity in War Discourse. Adab Al-Rafidenn, Vol. (68), 111-129.

Nevala, M. (2004) . Accessing politeness axes: Forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 2125–2160.

Oyetade, S. O. (1995) . A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in Yoruba". Language in Society, 24 (4),515-535.

Richards, C. J., Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of Language teaching and Applied Linguistics. New York: Pearson Education.

Sacks, H., Emanuel, S., and Gail,J. (1974) . A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turntaking for Conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.

Shih, Y. H. (1986) . Conversational politeness and Foreign Language Teaching. Taipei: Crane.

Stahl, C. (2004) . "Whose Discourse? A Comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian Concepts of Discourse in Critical IS Research", Proceedings of the Tenth American Conference on Information System, New York, 2004: 4329-4336.

Toolan, M. (1998). Language in Literature. London and New York : Arnold

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News Analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

-------------- (1989). Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power , in J.A. Anderson (ed.) .Communication Yearbook 12, pp. 18-59. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, Gender and Society (pp. 102-1 Woodburn, R., Arnott, L., Newell, A.F., Procter, R. (2011). A Study of Conversational Turn-Taking in a Communication Aid For the Disable. 1-8. Web. 10Oct. 2011.17). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Woodburn, R. Arnott, L. Newell, A.F, Proctor, R. (2011). A Study of Conversational Turn-Taking in a Communication Aid For The Disable. 1-8. Web.10Oct. 2011


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.