A Comparative Study of the Use of Persian vs. English in Teaching English Grammar to Iranian Students in Junior High School

Kowsar Mehrseresht, Habib Gowhary, Akbar Azizifar

Abstract


This study compared the relationship between the use of  Persian vs English in teaching English grammar to Iranian students and their achievement in learning English grammar. The   participants of this study include 50 female students from a junior high  school in Mehran. The researcher randomly selected 2 groups, one group was taught through the medium of Persian, while the other group was taught the same material through the medium of English. The materials were based on the content of the 3 lessons of third grade English text-book. Then a 30-item achievement test (pre-test) was administered to two groups  to be getting insured of their homogeneity. The instruction began in two groups separately and the treatment lasted for 5 weeks. After the end of the instruction, the test was administered to two groups as post-test again. The data analysis showed that two languages (Persian & English) lead to positive learning outcomes in the post-test, although the instruction through Persian caused better results than the instruction through the English.

Keywords:  Teach, Grammar, English, Persian, Junior high school, Language


Full Text:

PDF

References


Artemeva, N. (1995). The adult learner as incipient bilingual: The role of L1 in the adult ESL classrooms. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, XII, 113-136.

Atkinson, D. (1987). The Mother Tongue in the Classroom: a Neglected Resource? ELT Journal, 44(4), pp. 241-247.

Atkinson, D. (1993). Teaching in the target language: A problem in the current orthodoxy. Language Learning Journal(8), 2-5.

Auerbach, E. R. (1994). Comments on Elsa Roberts Auerbach's 'Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom', The author responds. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 157-161.

Butzkamm, W. (2003). We only learn language once. The role of the mother tongue in FL Classrooms: death of a dogma. Language learning journal, 28, p. 29-39.

Chambers, G. (1991). Promoting use of the target language in the classroom. Language Learning Journal, 4, 27-31.

Cook, V. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Hodder Education.

Duff, P. & Polio, C. (1990). How much foreign language is there in the foreign language classroom?. Modern Language Journal, 74(2), 154-166.

Harbord, J. (1992). The Use of the Mother Tongue in the Classroom. ELT Journal, 46(4), 30-55.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Ltd.

Morad-Abadi, B. (2003). The effect of translation as a facilitating factor in the teaching and learning of English on Iranian students. Alame Tabatabai University, Tehran.

Mori, R. (2004). "Staying-in-English rule revisited" System, 32, 225-236.

Polio, C. G. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 313-326.

Prodromou, L. (2002). From mother tongue to other tonge. [Electronic Version] Tesol Greece Newsletter from. http://www.tesolgreece.com/tesol-67.pdf.

Siah-Chashm, K. (1995). The precedence of teaching English through English over, teaching English through Persian. Alame Tabatabai University, Tehran.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.