The Effect of Motorized vs Non-Motorized Treadmills on Exercise Economy during Acute Sub-maximal Bouts in Collegiate Cross-Country Female Athletes

Nicole C. Dabbs, Miranda J. Reid, Jasmine Wimbish, Jason Ng

Abstract


Background: Fitness equipment manufacturers have developed non-motorized treadmills (NMT) to better replicate overground running, a characteristic which motorized treadmills (MT) purportedly lack. Because NMTs are novel, limited empirical evidence exists regarding acute physiological and neuromuscular activity responses to its use. Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effect of walking and running on an NMT and MT on exercise economy (EE), cardiometabolic responses, lower-body muscle activity, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in division II female cross-country athletes. Methods: Thirteen female cross-country athletes volunteered to complete a treadmill protocol that consisted of a warm-up walk, a 5-min walk, a 5-min run, and a 5-min cool-down walk on an NMT and MT on two separate occasions. During both treadmill conditions, VO2, RER, neuromuscular activity, HR, and RPE were recorded and analyzed every minute. Results: VO2 (NMT= 36.8 ± 10.0 ml/kg/min; MT= 27.4 ± 6.7 ml/kg/min), RER (NMT= 1.02 ± 0.14; MT= 0.89 ± 0.08), HR (NMT= 167 ± 18 bpm; MT= 142 ± 21 bpm), and RPE (NMT= 12 ± 2; MT= 9 ± 2) measures were significantly (p<0.05 for all) greater on the NMT than the MT in walking and running. Conclusions: The greater VO2, RER, and HR experienced on the NMT indicates higher physical exertion, and the greater RPE on the NMT indicates the participants’ perception of exertion correspond to the physiological responses. While cardiometabolic demand was greater on the NMT, thereby suggesting exercise economy was greater with the MT.

Keywords


Aerobic, Running, Electromyography, Oxygen Uptake, Walking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bacon, A. P., Carter, R. E., Ogle, E. A., & Joyner, M. J. (2013). VO2max trainability and high intensity interval training in humans: A meta-analysis. PloS One, 8(9), e73182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073182

Burton, D. A., Stokes, K. A., & Hall, G. M. (2004). Physiological effects of exercise. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 4(6), 185–188. https://doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001430

Cappellini, G., Ivanenko, Y. P., Poppele, R. E., & Lacquaniti, F. (2006). Motor patterns in human walking and running. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(6), 3426–3437. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00081.2006

Dabbs, N. C., Black, C., & Garner, J. C. (2016). Effects of whole body vibration on muscle contractile properties in exercse induced muscle damaged females. 30, 119–125.

de Almeida, M. O., Saragiotto, B. T., Yamato, T. P., & Lopes, A. D. (2015). Is the rearfoot pattern the most frequently foot strike pattern among recreational shod distance runners? Physical Therapy in Sport: Official Journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine, 16(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.005

De Witt, J. K., Lee, S. M. C., Wilson, C. A., & Hagan, R. D. (2009). Determinants of time to fatigue during nonmotorized treadmill exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(3), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a04de9

Edwards, R. B., Tofari, P. J., Cormack, S. J., & Whyte, D. G. (2017). Non-motorized Treadmill Running Is Associated with Higher Cardiometabolic Demands Compared with Overground and Motorized Treadmill Running. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00914

Ferretti, G., Fagoni, N., Taboni, A., Bruseghini, P., & Vinetti, G. (2017). The physiology of submaximal exercise: The steady state concept. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 246, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2017.08.005

Franks, K. A., Brown, L. E., Coburn, J. W., Kersey, R. D., & Bottaro, M. (2012). Effects of Motorized vs Non-Motorized Treadmill Training on Hamstring/Quadriceps Strength Ratios. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 11(1), 71–76.

Fullenkamp, A. M., Matthew Laurent, C., & Campbell, B. M. (2015). Automated gait temporal–spatial assessment from non-motorized treadmill belt speed data. Gait & Posture, 41(1), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.017

Gaesser, G. A., & Brooks, G. A. (1975). Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: Effects of speed and work rate. Journal of Applied Physiology, 38(6), 1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.1132

Gonzalez, A. M., Wells, A. J., Hoffman, J. R., Stout, J. R., Fragala, M. S., Mangine, G. T., … Robinson Iv, E. H. (2013). Reliability of the Woodway Curve(TM) Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12(1), 104–108.

Hatchett, A., Armstrong, K., Parr, B., Crews, M., & Tant, C. (2018). The Effect of a Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill on Running Gait Length, Imbalance and Stride Angle. Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6030058

Highton, J. M., Lamb, K. L., Twist, C., & Nicholas, C. (2012). The reliability and validity of short-distance sprint performance assessed on a nonmotorized treadmill. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(2), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225f384

Kim, J., Bae, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, N. (2016). Relationship of the Frontal Knee Alignment Measured by the HKA-Angle with the Relative Activation of the Quadriceps Muscles. Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine, 4(4), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2016.4.4.067

Kram, R. (2000). Muscular force or work: What determines the metabolic energy cost of running? Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(3), 138–143.

Lakomy, H. K. A. (1987). The use of a non-motorized treadmill for analysing sprint performance. Ergonomics, 30(4), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138708969756

Lee, N. (2018). Does the relative muscle activation of the vastus medialis, rectus femoris, and vastus lateralis, during the various activities, change in relation to the quadriceps angle? Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 30(4), 540–543. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.540

Lee, S. M. C., Dewitt, J., & Smith, C. (2008). Physiologic Responses and Biomechanical Aspects of Motorized and Nonmotorized Treadmill Exercise: A Ground-based Evaluation of Treadmills for Use on the International Space Station (Technical Paper No. NASA/TP-2008-213734). NASA Technical Paper.

Li, S., Xue, J., Hong, P., Song, C., & He, Z. (2020). Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism during overground and motorized treadmill running in Chinese middle-aged women. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1815. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58791-0

Lorenz, D. S., & Pontillo, M. (2012). Is there evidence to support a forefoot strike pattern in barefoot runners? A review. Sports Health, 4(6), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112448055

Mangine, G. T., Hoffman, J. R., Gonzalez, A. M., Wells, A. J., Townsend, J. R., Jajtner, A. R., … Stout, J. R. (2014). Speed, force, and power values produced from nonmotorized treadmill test are related to sprinting performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(7), 1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000316

Minahan, C. L., Poke, D. P., Morrison, J., & Bellinger, P. M. (2020). Muscle Damage and Metabolic Responses to Repeated-Sprint Running With and Without Deceleration. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(12), 3423–3430. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002164

Montgomery, G., Abt, G., Dobson, C., Smith, T., & Ditroilo, M. (2016). Tibial impacts and muscle activation during walking, jogging and running when performed overground, and on motorised and non-motorised treadmills. Gait & Posture, 49, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.037

Morgan, A. L., Laurent, C. M., & Fullenkamp, A. M. (2016). Comparison of VO2peak Performance on a Motorized vs. A Nonmotorized Treadmill. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(7), 1898–1905. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001273

Saunders, P. U., Pyne, D. B., Telford, R. D., & Hawley, J. A. (2004). Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 34(7), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005

Schoenmakers, P. P. J. M., Crisell, J. J., & Reed, K. E. (2020). Physiological and Perceptual Demands of Running on a Curved Nonmotorized Treadmill Compared With Running on a Motorized Treadmill Set at Different Grades. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(5), 1197–1200. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003571

Skovgaard, C., Christensen, P. M., Larsen, S., Andersen, T. R., Thomassen, M., & Bangsbo, J. (2014). Concurrent speed endurance and resistance training improves performance, running economy, and muscle NHE1 in moderately trained runners. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985), 117(10), 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2013

Stevens, C. J., Hacene, J., Wellham, B., Sculley, D. V., Callister, R., Taylor, L., & Dascombe, B. J. (2015). The validity of endurance running performance on the Curve 3(TM) non-motorised treadmill. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(11), 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.986502




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.9n.2p.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.