Accuracy of MRI Sequences in Detecting Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Lesions: A Systematic Review

Abdullah Dhaifallah Almutairi, Rozi Mahmud, Subapriya Suppiah, Hasyma Abu Hassan

Abstract


Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the chronic autoimmune central nervous system disorder that characterized by demyelination of axon in brain cortex and the other grey and white matter regions and it makes several symptoms. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with high sensitivity is the most important preclinical tool for the diagnosis of MS. The aim is to conduct systematic review studies carried out on accuracy of MRI sequences in detecting Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions. Methods: This study was systematic review. The related studies accomplished about using MRI in detecting MS lesions in worldwide included by searching in database and journal websites, including PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline. These articles searched by main keywords such as MRI, MS, lesions, sequence, and detecting. Conclusion: Our reviewing study showed that Double Inversion Recovery (DIR) Sequence in MRI has a high sensitivity to detect of lesion of MS. Furthermore, we recommend that the physicians add DIR sequence in routine MR protocols for diagnostic MS in patients.

Keywords


Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Lesions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lassmann H. Multiple sclerosis pathology. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2018;8(3):a028936.

Geurts JJG, Barkhof F. Grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(9):841–51.

Zajicek J, Fox P, Sanders H, Wright D, Vickery J, Nunn A, et al. Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS study): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. The lancet. 2003;362(9395):1517–26.

Kargarfard M, Shariat A, Ingle L, Cleland JA, Kargarfard M. A randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of aquatic exercise training on functional capacity, balance, and perceptions of fatigue in female patients with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017;

Ascherio A, Munger KL. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: the role of infection. Annals of neurology. 2007;61(4):288–99.

Ascherio A, Munger KL. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: Noninfectious factors. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 2007;61(6):504–13.

Ramagopalan S V, Dobson R, Meier UC, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis: risk factors, prodromes, and potential causal pathways. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9(7):727–39.

Alfredsson L, Olsson T. Lifestyle and environmental factors in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2018;a028944.

Amato MP, Derfuss T, Hemmer B, Liblau R, Montalban X, Soelberg Sørensen P, et al. Environmental modifiable risk factors for multiple sclerosis: report from the 2016 ECTRIMS focused workshop. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2018;24(5):590–603.

Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(2):162–73.

Filippi M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, De Stefano N, Evangelou N, Kappos L, et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. The Lancet Neurology. 2016;15(3):292–303.

Philpott C, Brotchie P. Comparison of MRI sequences for evaluation of multiple sclerosis of the cervical spinal cord at 3 T. European journal of radiology. 2011;80(3):780–5.

Vural G, Keklikoğlu HD, Temel Ş, Deniz O, Ercan K. Comparison of double inversion recovery and conventional magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and relations with disease disability. The neuroradiology journal. 2013;26(2):133–42.

Elnekeidy AM, Kamal MA, Elfatatry AM, Elskeikh ML. Added value of double inversion recovery magnetic resonance sequence in detection of cortical and white matter brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2014;45(4):1193–9.

Kolber P, Montag S, Fleischer V, Luessi F, Wilting J, Gawehn J, et al. Identification of cortical lesions using DIR and FLAIR in early stages of multiple sclerosis. Journal of neurology. 2015;262(6):1473–82.

Abidi Z, Faeghi F, Mardanshahi Z, Mortazavi H. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery sequence compared with FLAIR and T2W_TSE in detection of cerebral multiple sclerosis lesions. Electronic physician. 2017;9(4):4162.

Ertan G, Arici O, Ulus S, Metin B. Efficiency of Double Inversion Recovery (DIR) Sequence in the Evaluation of Supratentorial Cortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis. NeuroQuantology. 2018;16(3).

Wang KY, Uribe TA, Lincoln CM. Comparing lesion detection of infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions between T2-weighted spin-echo, 2D-FLAIR, and 3D-FLAIR sequences. Clinical imaging. 2018;51:229–34.

Han X, Wang X, Wang L, Zheng Z, Gu J, Tang D, et al. Investigation of grey matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis patients by combined use of double inversion recovery sequences and diffusion tensor MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Clinical radiology. 2018;73(9):834–e17.

De Santis S, Bastiani M, Droby A, Kolber P, Zipp F, Pracht E, et al. Characterizing microstructural tissue properties in multiple sclerosis with diffusion MRI at 7 T and 3 T: the impact of the experimental design. Neuroscience. 2018;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.abcmed.v.7n.2p.39

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine