Marginal Adaptation of Metal Ceramic Crowns Cast from Four Different Base Metal Alloys before and after Porcelain Application

Ali Hafezeqoran, Roodabeh Koodaryan, Ali Esmaili, Heydar Noori, Alireza Shahbaz

Abstract


Introduction: Marginal adaptation of a crown is an important factor affecting its clinical acceptability and durability; also, poorly fitting cast restoration enables bacterial plaque accumulation and leads to teeth caries and periodontal deterioration.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate marginal adaptation of 4all, Verabband2, T3 and Supremcast V base metal alloys before and after porcelain firing.

Material and Method: In this experimental study, a sound maxillary first premolar was prepared with chamfer and shoulder-bevel finish lines in palatal and buccal surfaces, respectively. Then the metal die was fabricated. Six points were marked 1 mm apical to the margin in the buccal and palatal surfaces. Forty impressions were taken from metal die by polyether impression material. Then, 10 frameworks were fabricated with each alloy type on stone dies. The vertical margin discrepancy between the frameworks and the marked points on metal dies were measured before and after porcelain firing. Paired sample t-test and One-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparison tests (Tukey test) were used to evaluate data. In this study, statistical significance was defined at p<0.05.

Results: Before porcelain firing, T3 alloy showed the lowest marginal discrepancy on chamfer finish line (13.13 ± (1.26)); but, the highest values were for Supermcast V copings and shoulder-bevel finish after porcelain application (30.83 ± (2.01)). The mean marginal discrepancies of buccal and palatal surfaces before porcelain application were significantly lower for all alloy types (p<0.001).

Conclusion:  The marginal adaptation of all four metal alloys was clinically acceptable and the thermal cycles of porcelain firing affected marginal adaptation.

 

Keywords: Crown; Marginal adaptation; Metal ceramic alloys 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139:14S-8S.

Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP.: Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:357-64.

Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR: The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 199; 40:17-21.

Boyle JJ, Naylor WP, Blackman RB. Marginal accuracy of metal ceramic restorations with porcelain facial margins. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:19-27.

Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:747–53.

Hung SH, Hung KS, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:26–31.

McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131:107-11.

Campbell SD, Pelletier LB. Effect of firing cycle and surface finishing on distortion of metal ceramic casting. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:476-81.

Iwashita AH, Kuriki HT, Husuo T. Studies on dimensional accuracy of porcelain fused to precious metal crowns, the influence of the porcelain to the metal coping on the porcelain fusing procedure. Shigaku 1977; 65:110-25.

Mclean JW. Wilson AD. But joint versus beveled gold margin in metal ceramic crowns. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 14:239-50.

Konsrantoulakis E, Nokojima H. Marginal fit and surface roughness of crown made with an accelerated cast technique. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 80:337-45.

Leinfelder KF. An evaluation of casting alloys used for restorative procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:37-45.

Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, Kessler JC. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th edition. Quintessence Publishing. 2012, 449-57.

Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16:297-305.

Lofstrom LH, Barakat MM. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations. J Proshet Dent 1989; 61:664-9.

Teteruck WR, Mumford G. The fit of certain dental casting alloys using different investing materials and techniques. J Proshet Dent 1966; 16:910-27.

Boening K, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of procera Allceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:419-24.

Buchanan WT, Svare CW, Turner KA. The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems. J prosthet Dent 1981; 45:502-6.

Pera P, Gilodi S,Bassi F,Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J prosthet Dent 1994; 72:585–90.

Rosner D (1963). Function, placement and reproduction of bevel for gold castings. J Prosthet Dent 1963; 13:1160-6.

Johnston JF, Mumford G, Dykema RW. The porcelain veneered gold crown. Dent Clin North Am 1963; 7:853-64.

Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Fisher DW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain fused to metal restorations. J Prosthet. Dent 1973; 29:276-84.

Faucher RR, Nicholls JI. Distortion related to margin design in porcelain fused to metal restorations. J prosthet dent 1980; 43:149-55.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine