Analyzing Listening and Speaking Activities of Iranian EFL Textbook Prospect 3 Through Bloom's Revised Taxonomy

Maryam Mizbani, Azizeh Chalak


Some significant components are essential in teaching a language. Among these, textbooks are the most significant ones and must be considered seriously. Textbooks play an important role in EFL teaching and learning because they can provide ready-made materials to both teachers and students. Besides, if textbooks aren’t used appropriately, they may spoil the process of teaching. This study aimed at analyzing listening and speaking activities of the textbook Prospect 3 which is used for Junior High School third graders in order to investigate in which level of lower or higher of the learning objectives related to Bloom’s (2001) Revised Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain they would be classified. The findings revealed that all of the activities of listening and speaking skills were classified as the low level of cognitive complexity and could not train the students of this grade for high levels of learning objectives. Hence the teachers should employ extra activities to make the students perform in higher levels of thinking skills and book designers should improve the content of the textbook to cover the higher levels of the cognitive domain.



Bloom’s Cognitive Domain, listening, speaking, textbook analysis, thinking skills

Full Text:



Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.

Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.

Cunningsworth A. (1995). Choosing your course book. Oxford: Heinemann.

Halawi, L., McCarthy, R., & Pires, S. (2009). An evaluation of learning on the basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Education for Business.

Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as an agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.

Igbaria, A. (2013). A content analysis of the wh-questions in the EFL textbook of Horizons. International Education Studies, 6(7).

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. Retrieved from Marksberry, M., (1963). Foundations of creativity. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Rahmawati, I., & Prayogo, J. (2013). An analysis of reading questions in English textbook Interchange based on RBT. http://jurnal-

Rahpeyma, A., & Khoshnood, A. (2015). The analysis of learning objectives in Iranian junior high school English textbooks based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies,3(2).

Razmjoo, S. A., & Kazempourfard, E. (2012). On the representation of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy in Interchange coursebooks. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 4(1).

Risner, G., Nicholson, J., & Myhan, J. (1991). Levels of questioning in current elementary textbooks. Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Lexington: Kentucky.

Sadeghi, B., & Mahdipour, N. (2015). Evaluating ILI Advanced Series through Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Science Journal, 36(3).

Wang, v., & Farmer, L. (2008). Adult teaching methods in China and Bloom’ s Taxonomy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2).

Zareian, G., Davoudi, M., Heshmatifar, Z., & Rahimi, J. (2015). An evaluation of questions in two ESP course books based on Bloom’s New Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Domain. International Journal of Education and Research, 3 (8).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.