The Effect of Focus on Form and Task Complexity on L2 Learners’ Oral Task Performance

Asghar Salimi

Abstract


Second Language learners’ oral task performance has been one of interesting and research generating areas of investigations in the field of second language acquisition specially, task-based language teaching and learning. The main purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of focus on form and task complexity on L2 learners’ oral task accuracy. To this end, sixty intermediate learners of English as a foreign language attending an English institute were chosen as the participant of the study and were divided into three groups control and two experimental groups with and without focus on form strategy. ANOVA and Independent Sample T-test were employed as the statistical means of analysis. The results a of analysis revealed significant differences among the performance of the groups. The study carries significant implications for syllabus and task designers, curriculum developers and language teachers.

Keywords: Accuracy, Focus on form, Task, Task-based language teaching, Task complexity

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Doughty, C. (2001). 'Cognitive underpinning of focus on form' In P. Robinson(Ed.). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3), 229-246.

Foster, P. (1999). Task-based learning and pedagogy. ELT Journal, 53(1), 69-70.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12-20.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247.

Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Barcelona, Spain.

Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215-240.

Hejazi, M. (2012). Teacher's error correction: A key factor in developing Iranian EFL learners' speech accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 619-624.

Hosseini, P. & Rahimpour, M. (2010). The Impact of Task Complexity on L2 Learners' Written Narratives. CCSE, 3 (3), 198-205.

Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effects of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4), 193-225.

Kuiken, F., Mos, M. &Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In Eurosla Yearbook 5, Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Maria del PilarGarcía Mayo and Jasone Cenoz(eds.), 195-222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 261-284.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48-60.

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition (pp.77-99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C.Ritchie and T.K.Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition. (pp.413-463). San Diego; Academic Press.

Lynch, T. & J. Maclean. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221-50.

Ong, J., & Zhang, L.J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. Doi: 10.1016/J.JSLW

Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Rahimpour, M. (2007). Task complexity and variation in L2 learners’ oral discourse. Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, University of Queensland, 1-9.

Rezazadeh, M., Tavakoli, M. & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2011). The Role of task type in foreign language written production: Focusing on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. International Education Studies, 4(2), 169-176.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.

Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32.

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 193-213.

Rosa, E, & O’Neill, D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issues of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-553.

Salimi, A. & Dadashpour, S. (2012a). Task complexity and SL development: Does task complexity matter? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 726-735.

Salimi, A. & Dadashpour, S. (2012b). Task Complexity and Language Production Dilemmas (Robinson's Cognition Hypothesis vs. Skehan's Trade-off Model). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 643-652.

Salimi, A., Alavinia, P., & Hosseini, P. (2012). The effect of strategic planning time and task complexity on L2 written accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2 (11), 2398-2406.

Salimi, A. & Yousefi, M. (2009). The effect of task complexity on L2 learners' uptake in EFL context. A paper presented at 7th International TELLSI Conference. University of Yazd, October, 20-22

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11, 129-58.

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.

Schmidt, R. (2000). 'Attention" in P. Robinson (Ed.): Cognition and second language

instruction. (PP. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.

Skehan, P. (1998a). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268-286.

Skehan, P. (1998b). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1-14.

Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.

Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M. (1998). 'Focus on form through conscious reflection' in C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.). pp: 64-81.

Van Patten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: an experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.

VanPatten, B. & T. Cadierno. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-41.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2001). Task-based language learning. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp.173-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.