Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Improving Undergraduates’ Argumentative Group Essay Writing through Self-assessment
Abstract
When writing an argumentative essay, writers develop and evaluate arguments to embody, initiate, or simulate various kinds of interpersonal and textual interaction for reader consideration (Wu & Allison, 2003). This is quite challenging for English as a second language (ESL) learners. To improve the quality of their writing, students need to review their draft throughout the writing process. This study aimed to investigate the effect of self-assessment in group writing and how group work improves students’ writing ability. An intact class comprising 22 first-year undergraduates participated in the study. Data were collected from pre- and post-treatment writing tests, semi-structured interview and reflection entries. The results revealed that self-assessment has a significant effect on students’ writing performance. Group work also enhanced social and cognitive development of the students. This study provides insights into the use of self-assessment in writing class to develop learner autonomy and improve writing ability.
Keywords: Argumentative essay, Self-assessment, Learner autonomy, Group writing, ESL learners
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bardine, F., & Fulton, P. (2008). Analyzing the benefits of revision memos during the writing and revision process. The Clearing House, 81(4), 149-54.
Butler, J. A., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Investigating instruction for improving revision of argumentative essays. Written Communication, 28(1), 70–96.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3th ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Cheng, F., & Chen, Y. (2009). Taiwanese argumentation skills: Contrastive rhetoric perspective. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), 23-50.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hubert, J. (2010). Collaborative learning and self-assessment through reflective writing. The International Journal of Learning, 17(5), 385-398.
Jacobs, H., Zingraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Khodadady, E., & Khodabakhshzade, H. (2012). The effect of portfolio and self-assessment on writing ability and autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 518-524.
Lam, R. (2010). The role of self-assessment in students’ writing portfolios: A classroom investigation. TESL Reporter, 43(2), 16-34.
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nielsen, K. (2012). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: a conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 1-16.
Nimehchisalem, V., Yoong, D. S. C., Kaur, S. J. S., Siti Zaidah, Z., Norouzi, S., & Sheren, K. (2014). A self-assessment checklist for undergraduate students’ argumentative writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 2203-4714.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
Vickers, C., & Ene, E. (2006). Grammatical accuracy and learner autonomy in advanced writing. English Language Teaching Journal, 60(2), 109-116.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364-374.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.