The Effort to Increase the Students’ Achievement in Poetry Mastery through Semiotic Method

I Wy. Dirgeyasa

Abstract


The obejectives of this research are to know the improvement  of the students’ achievement in poetry mastery and their perception regarding to the semiotic method in teaching and learning poetry in  English Education Department, Languages and Art Faculty of State University of Medan. The research method used is the Classroom Action Research (CAR). The subjects of the research are the fifth semester of 37 students of 2013/2014 academic year. The data are collected by test in order to know the students’ achievment in poetry mastery. The students’ perception toward the implementation of the semiotic method for teaching and learning poetry is collected by questionaire. The data are analyzed by descriptive analysis. The result of research shows that (1) the average score of the students’ achievement of poetry mastery is (71.75) or it increases (11,59) point from pre-test (60.16) and (2) in general, the students’ perception toward the semiotic method for teaching and learning poetry are good and positive.


Keywords


semiotic method, poetry, perception, and learning achievment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansari, Khairil and Dirgeyasa I Wy. (2013). Analisis Makna Puisi King, Jr’s ‘I Have a Dream’(The Analysis of Meaning of King Jr’s Poetry “I Have a Dream”) dalam Sastra Indonesia Berakar Pada Sastra Daerah Menuju Sastra Dunia. Proceeding. Bandung : Penerbit UNPAD Press, p.66.

Brizee, Allen and Tompkins, J. C. (2009). Theory and Schools of Criticism. In (http:/owl.english.purdue.edu) assessed on January 28, 2009.

Brown. H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. New York: Pearson Education. Inc.

Budianto, M. et al. (2002). Membaca Sastra (Reading Poetry). Jakarta: Indonesiatra.

Djojosubroto, Kinayati. (2006). Pengajaran Puisi dan Pemahaman (Teaching Poetry and Its Comprehension). Bandung: Nuansa.

Endraswara, S. (2008). Metode Penelitian Psikologi Sastra (Research Methodolgy for Literature Psychology). Yogyakarta: MedPress.

Fananie, Zainuddin. (2011). Telaah Sastra (The Study of Literature). Surakarta: Muhammadyah University Press.

Hamalik, Umar. (2007). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem (A Systemic Approach for Teaching Planning). Bandung: Bumi Aksara.

Harmer, Jeramy. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching, 4th ed. London: Longman Pearson.

Hoed, H. B. (2008). Semiotika dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya (Semiotic and Social and Cultural Dynamics). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Jabrohim, ed. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra (Literature Research Methodology). Yogyakarta: Hanindita.

KBK Curriculum. (2004). English Department of Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

Kennnedy.X.J.(1979). Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Kitao, Kenji. Selecting and Developing Teaching and Learning Materials in http//itself.org/article/Kiato-material htm/7/26/2014.

Kull, Kalevi. (2011). Juri Lotman in English: Bibliography. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4), 2011, p.343.

Masinambow, E.M.K, and Hidayat., S.R. (2001). Semiotik Mengkaji Tanda dalam Aritfak (Semiotics the Study of Signs and Artifact) Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2005). Sastra Anak (Children Literature).Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Paniagua, M. Zalbidea. (2009) Cultural Studies through Literary and Semiotic Approaches: A Review Article of New Manuals by Walton and Thwaites, Davis, and Mules in CLC Web: Comparative Literature and Culture. Vol. 11. Issue.4. p.8.

Pradopo, R. D. (1994). Prinsip-Prinsip Kritik Sastra (The Principles of Literary Criticism). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

_______2003. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya (Literary Theories, Critic Method, and Its Implementation). Yogyakarta: Pustaka.

_______2009. Pengkajian Puisi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ratna, N. K. (2004). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra (Theory, Method, and Literature Research Technique) Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Self-Evaluation. (2013). English Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan. Medan.

Segersi,T.Riem.1978. Evaluasi Teks Sastra (Evaluation of Literary Text), terjemahan Suminto. A. Sayuti.Yogyakarta: Adicita.

Siegel, Kristi, 2009. Introduction to Modern Literary Theory. In

(http://www.Kristisiegel.com/theory.htm. Assessed on March 02, 2011.

Siswanto, W. 2008. Pengantar Teori Sastra (Introduction to Literary Theory). Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sutikno, Sobry and Fathurrohman, Pupuh (2007). Strategi Belajar Mengajar (Teaching and Learning Strategy). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Wardarita, R. 2007. Kajian Struktural-Semiotik Dalam Puisi-Puisi Karya Chairil Anwar (The Structural-Semiotics Study of Khairil Anwar’s Peotry) Journal Mandiri (9) 4.

Wellek, R. dan Austin Warren. 1995. Teori Kesusastraan (Literary Theories) Jakarta: Gramedia

Wiyatmi. 2006. Pengantar Kajian Sastra (Introduction to Literary Study). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Book Publisher.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.