Intensity Classification of Drills for a Collegiate Women’s Lacrosse Team: An Observational Study

Kathryn H. Alphin, Brynn L. Hudgins, Jennifer A. Bunn

Abstract


Background: Balancing training load helps prevent injury and maximize performance, but coaches do not often know the load or intensity of drills when making selections for practice. Objective: This study aimed to classify the drills of a women’s collegiate lacrosse team into low, moderate, and high intensity categories. Methods: Twenty-five participants wore global positioning system (GPS) devices and heart rate (HR) monitors daily during team practice and scrimmage matches. The data collected was trimmed to reflect only the time the players practiced and then organized by drill. Mean HR, distance rate, and training impulse (TRIMP) scores were used to classify drills into tertiles: low, moderate, and high intensity. Results: A total of 56 unique drills were analyzed over 33 training days, with 24 drills considered moderate intensity, 17 drills were high intensity, and 15 drills were low intensity. By position, 17 drills were low intensity for the midfielders, followed by 16 for the attacker, and 12 for the defenders and goalies. The defenders had the highest number of moderate intensity drills with 27, followed by the attackers with 24, midfielders with 21, and goalies with 17. Lastly, midfielders and goalies had the highest number of high intensity drills with 18, followed by attackers with 17, and defenders with 16. Conclusions: These results will help the coaching and training staff manage workloads and potentially reduce risk of injury and overtraining by giving insight into the demands of each drill they require of their athletes.

Keywords


Heart Rate, Distance, Athletes, Workload, Exercise, Global Positioning System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., Cable, N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(Suppl 2), S2161-S2170. doi:10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208

Conte, D., Kolb, N., Scanlan, A. T., & Santolamazza, F. (2018). Monitoring training load and well-being during the in-season phase in national collegiate athletic association division I men's basketball. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(8), 1067-1074. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0689

Cummins, C., Orr, R., O'Connor, H., & West, C. (2013). Global positioning systems (GPS) and microtechnology sensors in team sports: A systematic review. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 43(10), 1025-1042. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0069-2

Cunniffe, B., Proctor, W., Baker, J. S., & Davies, B. (2009). An evaluation of the physiological demands of elite rugby union using global positioning system tracking software. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(4), 1195-1203. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a3928b

Dalen, T., Ingebrigtsen, J., Ettema, G., Hjelde, G. H., & Wisloff, U. (2016). Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(2), 351-359. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001063

Dalen, T., Ingebrigtsen, J., Ettema, G., Hjelde, G. H., & Wisloff, U. (2016). Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(2), 351-359. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001063

Elloumi, M., Makni, E., Moalla, W., Bouaziz, T., Tabka, Z., Lac, G., & Chamari, K. (2012). Monitoring training load and fatigue in rugby seven players. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 3(3), 175-184.

Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788

Gabbett, T. J. (2018). Debunking the myths about training load, injury and performance: Empirical evidence, hot topics and recommendations for practitioners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, doi:bjsports-2018-099784

Gabbett, T. J., Nassis, G. P., Oetter, E., Pretorius, J., Johnston, N., Medina, D., . . . Ryan, A. (2017). The athlete monitoring cycle: A practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(20), 1451-1452. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097298

Hulin, B. T., Gabbett, T. J., Lawson, D. W., Caputi, P., & Sampson, J. A. (2016). The acute:Chronic workload ratio predicts injury: High chronic workload may decrease injury risk in elite rugby league players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(4), 231-236. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094817

Loader, J., Montgomery, P.G., Williams, M.D., Lorenzen, C., Kemp, J.G. (2012). Classifying training drills based on movement demands in Australian football. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 7(1), 57-68.

Weaving, D., Jones, B., Marshall, P., Till, K., & Abt, G. (2017). Multiple measures are needed to quantify training loads in professional rugby league. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(10), 735-740. doi:10.1055/s-0043-114007

Weaving, D., Marshall, P., Earle, K., Nevill, A., & Abt, G. (2014). Combining internal- and external-training-load measures in professional rugby league. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9(6), 905-912. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0444

Wing, C. (2018). Monitoring athlete load: Data collection methods and practical recommendations. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 40(4), 26-39. doi:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000384




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.7n.3p.16

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.