Impacts of Action Research-oriented Upgrading Training on Initial and Early Reading Comprehension Performances of Students

Alemu Hailu Anshu

Abstract


This article reports impacts of action research-oriented upgrading training given to teachers on early reading performances of Grades 2 & 3 students. Initially a baseline assessment was conducted to determine the initial reading performances of the students, and a survey was conducted to identify the training and experience teachers had in teaching initial and early reading skills. Based on the findings of the baseline assessment and the survey made, a training module was prepared focusing on the nature of teaching of initial and early reading skills, and initial up-grading training was given for nine days. Six months later, impact assessment of the initial training was conducted to see improvements in students’ reading performances, and school visits were made to see changes of initial and early reading teaching practices and to investigate further training gaps that teachers might have needed. The training module was revised based on the feedbacks received from the initial impact assessment and the observations made. Based on the noticed training gap, refreshment training was given for the same teachers for five days. Six months later, an overall impact assessment was conducted to see an overall reading skills improvement of the students because of the trainings the teachers received. The finding shows that students’ reading performances greatly improved because of the action research-oriented up-grading trainings. Percentages of Grade 2 students who failed to identify alphabets (62.6%) and who scored zero in early reading comprehension test (47%) reduced to 34.4% and 38.3% after the initial training, respectively, and dropped to 1.3% and 29.8% after the refresher training. Similarly, percentages of Grade 3 students (49.15%) who failed to read common words in the textbook dropped to 14.5% and 6.9% after the initial training and the refresher trainings, respectively.

Keywords


Action Research-Oriented; Impacts; Initial and Early Reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alemu H. (2009). Teachers’ Belief Systems: Implications for Teacher Professional Development Programs and Educational Change, The Ethiopian Journal of Education (EJE), 29(1) 121- 138.

Alemu H. (2010). Implementing Methodological Innovations in EFL Classrooms: Challenges and Directions. Berlin: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Rutledge.

Greenwood, J. D. & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to Action Research: Social research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Heen, H. (2005). About feelings in action research: An experiment in first-person inquiry. Action Research, 3(3), 263–278.

Heron, J. (1971). Experience and Method. Guildford: University of Surrey.

Heron, J. & Reason, P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 179–188). London: Sage Publications.

IIRR. (2011). Early Grade Reading Assessment in Goro Dola, Dilo, and Moyalle Woredas of Oromia Region, unpublished.

IIRR. (2012). Early Grade Reading Assessment in Goro Dola, Dilo, and Moyalle Woredas of Oromia Region, unpublished.

Johnson, K. (ed.). (1989). The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kemmis, S. & McTaggert, R. (eds). (1988). The Action Research Planner, Third Edition. Geelong: Dakin University Press.

Kemmis, S. & McTaggert, R. (2003). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd ed.). pp. 336–396. London, New Delhi and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. Communication and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). pp. 559-604. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Lewin, K. (1944). The dynamics of group action. Educational Leadership, 1(4), 195-200.

Marshall, J. & Mead, G. (2005). Editorial: Self-reflective practice and first-person action research. Action Research, 3(3), 235-244.

Mertler, Craig A. (2013). Classroom-Based Action Research: Revisiting the Process as Customizable and Meaningful Professional Development for Educators. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 3(3), 37- 42.

Nation, I. S. & Macalister, J. (2009). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.

Peters, M. & Robinson, V. 1984. The origins and status of action research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(2), 113–124.

Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2001). Preface. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. xxiii–xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2006a). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2006b). Preface. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. xxi–xxxii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (eds.). (2008). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodgers, T. S. (1989). Syllabus design, curriculum development and polity determination. In Johnson (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (24- 34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

USAID. (2010). Ethiopia Early Grade Reading Assessment: Data Analytic Report: Language and Early Learning. Addis Ababa: United States Agency for International Development.

Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320-330.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.1p.31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.