The Profile of Misconceptions among Science Subject Student-Teachers in Primary Schools

Nataria Wahyuning Subayani


Students’ different background knowledge determines their quality of conceptions towards a specific subject in college. This research sought to uncover the profile of misconceptions experienced by 48 students of Primary School Teaching Major, studying Science in University of Muhammadiyah Gresik. The educational background of the students in high school were different. They came from natural science, social science and culinary departments and were divided into three groups accordingly. The identification method used was CRI (Certainty of Response Index) which is a model of correct and incorrect statements accompanied by reasons and level of confidence in answering questions. The research instrument was also supported by interviews. The findings of the study were: (1) The misconception of natural  science was experienced by all the three students; (2) of the three groups, natural science students had the lowest misconception compared with the social science and culinary students; (3) the causes of misconceptions of natural sciences were related to improper answers due to certain terms and expressions; the relationship between the concept and meaning of the sentence which is too general or too narrow; not understanding the concept completely, lack of curiosity in doing  exam items, never studying the concept before, and the incomplete delivery concept of high school teachers; and finally (4) psychological factors that accompany the occurrence of misconceptions included the feeling of tense and embarrassment in the interview of this research. The researcher suggests that there should be a matriculation program of five major subjects in the department of Primary School Teaching Major especially in the first year of courses supported by the reasonable ratio of students in one class that meets its capacity.

Keywords: Misconception, CRI (Certainty of Response Index), Primary School Teaching, Science Subject

Full Text:



Belo, N. A.H., Driel, J. H. V, & Verloop N. (2010). Teachers’ Beliefs about Making Physics Engaging and Comprehensible for Secondary Students in the Netherlands. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 29‐39). Ankara, Turkey: PegemAkademi.

Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., &Abell S. (2010). Do Beliefs Change? Investigating Prospective Teachers’ Science Teaching Orientations during an Accelerated Post-baccalaureate Program. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 41‐51). Ankara, Turkey: PegemAkademi.

Concannon, J.P., Brown P.L. , & Brown E., (2013). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Science Theories: An Action Research Study. Creative Education, 4(1), 82-88.

Fitzgerald A., Hackling M, & Dawson V. (2010). Beliefs, Knowledge and Practices of Two Effective Primary Science Teachers. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 53‐58). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Hasan, S., D. Bagayoko, D., and Kelley, E. L., 1999, Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Journal Physics Education, 34(5), 294-299.

Ibrahim, M. 2012. Konsep, Miskonsepsidan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Kestler, N., S. 2014. Middle School Science Teachers’ Understanding of Students’ Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration. A Master’s Thesis or the Degree of Master of Science in Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, State University of New York at Fredonia. Retrieved from

Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (2): 283-293

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (3rd edition). London: Sage.

Ormrod, J. W. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan MembantuSiswaTumbuh dan Berkembang. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Lange K., Kleickmann T., & Moeller K. (2010). Measuring primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in science education with open-ended and multiple-choice items. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 67‐69). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2010). A mixed methods approach to characterize the beliefs on science teaching and learning of freshman science student teachers from different science teaching domains. In M.F. Taşar& G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: teaching (pp. 21‐28). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

Sugiyono. (2010). MetodePenelitiansKuantitatifKualitatifdan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta.

Suparno. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta:GramediaWidiasarana Indonesia.

Taufiq, M. (2012). RemidiasiMiskonsepsiMahasiswaCalon Guru FisikaPadaKonsep Gaya MelaluiPenerapan Model SiklusBelajar (Learning Cycle) 5E, JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia. 1(2) 198-203.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.