The Structure and Function of Lexical Bundles in Communicative Saudi High School EFL Textbooks

Alaa Alzahrani

Abstract


Current English Language Teaching (ELT) textbooks have largely adopted the communicative approach by using authentic materials to foster EFL students’ communicative competence. However, the communicative status of Saudi high school English textbooks has been underexplored. One way to assess the authenticity of Saudi EFL textbooks is by considering their use of a frequent linguistic item known as lexical bundles. Thus, the present study investigated whether the lexical bundles in communicative Saudi high school textbooks are representative of conversational English. This comparative corpus study used a lexical bundle approach to compare the ten most frequent lexical bundles in the textbooks to those in an English reference corpus. Results show that three and four-word lexical bundles are less frequent in the textbooks compared to the reference corpus and that there is considerable variation in the structural and functional patterns of the bundles in the two corpora. Pedagogical implications are discussed in light of the findings.

Keywords


Lexical Bundles, High School EFL Textbooks, Authentic EFL Textbooks

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan, R. (2017). From do you know to I don’t know: An analysis of the frequency and usefulness of lexical bundles in five English language self-study books. Corpus Pragmatics, 1(4), 351–372.

Alquraishi, M. A. (2014). Lexical Bundles in an Advanced INTO CSU Writing Class and Engineering Texts: A Functional Analysis (Unpublished MA thesis). Colorado State University.

Biber, D. (2006a). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Biber, D. (2006b). University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amesterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at ...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

Chen, L. (2010). An Investigation of Lexical Bundles in ESP Textbooks and Electrical Engineering Introductory Textbooks. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication (pp. 107–125). New York, NY: Continuum.

Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.

Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2004). The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica, 20, 56–71.

Coxhead, A., Yen Dang, T. N., & Mukai, S. (2017). Single and multi-word unit vocabulary in university tutorials and laboratories: Evidence from corpora and textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 66–78.

Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819.

Gouverneur, C. (2008). The phraseological patterns of high-frequency verbs in advanced English for general purposes: a corpus-drived approach to EFL textbook analysis. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 223–243).

Gries, S. T. (2010). Useful statistics for corpus linguistics. In A. Sanchez & M. Almela (Eds.), A mosaic of corpus linguistics: Selected approaches (pp. 269–291). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Jeong, H., & Jiang, N. (2019). Representation and processing of lexical bundles: Evidence from word monitoring. System, 80, 188–198.

Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344.

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mitchell, H. Q., & Malkogianni, M. (2019). Traveller 1 KSA Edition Teacher’s Manual. MM publications.

Nekrasova-Beker, T., & Becker, A. (2019). Lexical bundles in university course materials: From academic English to pathway to mainstream engineering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(2), 143–168.

Northbrook, J., & Conklin, K. (2018a). Is what you put in what you get out?—Textbook-derived lexical bundle processing in beginner English learners. Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 816–833.

Northbrook, J., & Conklin, K. (2018b). “What are you talking about?”: An analysis of lexical bundles in Japanese junior high school textbooks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 311–334.

Soars, L., & Soars, J. (2009). New Headway Plus: Upper-intermediate. Student’s Book. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Spencer, D. (2016). Gateway. Student’s Book. (2nd, Ed.). Macmillan Education.

Widodo, H. P. (2012). The Use of Complaint Letters as an Authentic Source of Input for an Interactive Task in Second Language Learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(2), 245–258.

Wood, D. (2010). Lexical Clusters in an EAP Textbook Corpus. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication (pp. 88–106). New York, NY: Continuum.

Wood, D., & Appel, R. (2014). Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 1–13.

Yoo, S. (2013). Hypothetical would-clauses in Korean EFL textbooks: An analysis based on a corpus study and focus on form approach (Unpublished master’s thesis). Portland State University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.5p.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.