Is Multicultural Effectiveness Related to Phrasal Knowledge in English as a Second Language?

Fanny Forsberg Lundell, June Eyckmans, Alexandra Rosiers, Klara Arvidsson

Abstract


The present study investigates the role of personality in language learning, with a special focus on the association between multicultural effectiveness and phrasal knowledge in L1 Dutch L2 English learners in Belgium (n=97). Results from the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) (five personality dimensions) were associated with results from a rational cloze test, measuring productive phrasal knowledge. In addition, scores from grammar proficiency tests were also included, since language proficiency is known to be a strong predictor for phrasal knowledge. A regression analysis revealed significant associations between phrasal knowledge and the personality dimensions Flexibility and Openmindedness, when grammar proficiency was controlled for. This study adds to the growing body of evidence of associations between phrasal knowledge and personality, encouraging researchers to pursue this avenue with learners from different L1/L2 pairings, in different contexts of L2 acquisition.


Keywords


personality, phrasal knowledge, formulaic sequences, multicultural effectiveness, English as a Second Language, individual differences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481-509.

Adolphs, S. & Durow, V. (2004). Socio-cultural integration and the development of formulaic sequences. In Schmitt,

N. (ed), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, processing, use. (pp. 107–126) Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Arnaud, P. J. L., & Savignon, S. J. (1997). Rare words, complex lexical units and the advanced learner. In J. Coady &

T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language VocabularyAcquisition (pp. 157–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second acquisition. Basingstoke:

Palgrave MacMillan.

Boers, F., J. Eyckmans, J. Kappel, H. Stengers, and M. Demecheleer. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261.

Bolibaugh, C. & Foster, P. (2013). Memory-based aptitude for nativelike selection. The role of phonological short-term memory. In Granena, G. and Long, M. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment. (pp. 205-230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins..

Bolly, C. (2009). The acquisition of phraseological units by advanced learners of French as an L2: High frequency verbs and learner corpora. In Labeau, E. & Myles, F. (Eds), The advanced learner variety: the case of French. (pp. 5-27). Oxford: Peter Lang.

Butler, C.S. (2005). Formulaic language. In Butler, C.S., de los Angeles Gómez-Gonzales, M. & Doval-Suárez, S.M. (eds), The Dynamics of Language Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies of Second Language Acquisition 24 (2). 215–221.

Deconinck J., Eyckmans, J. & F. Boers (2009) Music to their ears? Assessing learners’ sensitivity to the form of multi-word units. In Koole T., Nortier J. & Tahitu B. (Eds.), Artikelen van de Zesde Anéla Conferentie (p. 63-72) Delft: Eburon.

Dewaele, J-M. (2013). Personality in Second Language Acquisition. In: Chapelle, C.A (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Wiley-Blackwell.

Dörnyei, Z. & Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.

Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2(4). 143–188.

Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,

(2), 297-339.

Ellis, N.C. (2005). At the interface: dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.

Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition,

salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2). 164-194.

Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The Associative learning of constructions,

learned attention and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics

and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 372-406). New York, NY: Routledge.

Erman, B. & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice

principle. Text, 20(1), 29–62.

Eyckmans J. (2010) Phrase-noticing or phrase-learning: A question of semantics? In: Moreno Jaén M., Serrano Valverde F. & M. Calzada Pérez (Eds.) Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy Lexis and Corpus-Based Language Teaching (p.31-42). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Eyckmans J., Boers F. & Stengers H. (2007) Identifying chunks: who can see the wood for the trees? Language Forum, 33(2), 85-100.

Fitzpatrick, T. & Wray, A. (2006). Breaking up is not so hard to do. Individual

Differences in L2 memorisation. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 35-57.

Forsberg, F. and Fant, L. (2010). Idiomatically speaking – effects of task variation on formulaic language in high proficient users of L2 French and Spanish. In: Wood, D. (ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language in acquisition and communication. New York: Continuum. 47–70.

Forsberg Lundell, F. and Lindqvist, C. (2014). Lexical aspects in very advanced L2 French. Canadian Modern Language Review 70/1, 28-49.

Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H, Gudmundsson, A, Hancock, V. and Lindqvist, C . (2014). Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies, 24(2), 1–26.

Forsberg Lundell, F. & Lindqvist, C. (2012). Vocabulary development in advanced L2 French – do formulaic sequences and lexical richness develop at the same rate? LIA (Langage, Interactions, Acquisition), 3(1), p. 73-92.

Forsberg Lundell, F., and Sandgren, M. (2013). High-level proficiency in late L2 acquisition – Relationships between collocational production, language aptitude and personality. In: Granena, G. and Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive periods, aptitudes and ultimateattainment in L2. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 231–256

Foster, P. & Bolbaugh, C. & Kotula, A. (2014). Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 101-132.

Granena, G. (2013a). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA aptitude test. In Granena, G. and Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment. (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Granena, G. (2013b). Reexamining the robustness of aptitude in second language acquisition. In Granena, G. and Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment. (179–205).Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Granena, G. and Long, M. (Eds.) 2013. Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Guiora, A. Z., Brannon, R. C. and Dull, C.Y. (1972). Empathy and second language learning. Language Learning 22 (1), 111-130.

Gries, S. & Divjak, D. (Eds) (2012). Frequency effects in language learning and processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kaufman, S.B., De Young, C.G., Gray, J.R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J. Mackintosh, J. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321-340.

Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In Granena, G. and Long, M. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment. (pp. 131-152) .Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lewis, M. (2009). The Idiom Principle in L2 English: Assessing elusive formulaic sequences as indicators of idiomaticity, fluency, and proficiency. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.

Mizrahi, E., & Laufer, B. (2010). Lexical competence of highly advanced L2 users: is their collocation knowledge as

good as their productive vocabulary size? Paper presented at Eurosla 20, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Mizrahi, E., & Laufer, B. (2011). Does one need a native-like productive lexical knowledge to pass for a native writer?

Paper presented at Eurosla 21, Stockholm, Sweden.

Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223‒242.

Nesselhauf, N. 2005. Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Oudenhoven, J.P., van der Zee, K.I. (2002). Predicting multicultural effectiveness of international students: The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 26. 679–694.

van der Zee, K.I. Van Oudenhouven, J.P, Ponterotto, J.G. & Fietzer, A.W. (2013). Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: Development of a short from. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 118-124.

Paquot, M. & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130-149.

Pawley, A. & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (eds.) Language and Communication (pp. 191-227. London: Routledge.

Segalowitz, N., Gatbonton, E. and Trofimovich, P. (2009). Links between ethnolinguistic affiliation, self-related motivation and second language fluency: Are they mediated by psycholinguistic variables? In Dörnyei, Z and Ushioda, E (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. (pp. 172–192).

Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Schmitt, N. (ed). (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.

Schmitt, N. (2013). Formulaic Language and Collocation. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley Online

Library.

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge. What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.

Speciale, G., Ellis, N.C. and Bywater, M. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25. 293–321

Stengers, H. (2009). The Idiom Principle put to the test: An exercise in Applied Comparative Linguistics. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association?, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321‒343.

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.